Sentences with phrase «climate alarmist»

To date, the electric utility industry has aided and abetted the climate alarmist cause, if not by actually lobbying for global warming regulation, then at least by its willingness to entertain such regulation as public policy worthy of serious consideration.

The problem arises because climate alarmist prefer to assume there are only positive feedback mechanisms in play with increasing CO2 emissions such that we will have runaway temperatures and catastrophic climate outcomes.

I would personally love to see you defend the climate alarmist argument in a real debate.

The UN's IPCC and associated climate alarmist scientists predicted that severe weather would increase globally as a result of human - caused global warming.

Chris Hitchens was really at heart one us he was a humanist always forward looking optomistic loved the triump of the human spirit (not a miserbalist control freaking climate alarmist) But mainly he loved all things Ameican (ecept the Clintons) He was this famous scruffy agnostic rather right centred carrassmatic interlectual a great writer and thinker (unlike his his great sibling interlectual rival his brother Peter without the scruffy or the agnostic) Peter and Chris were exactly like that other great brotherly partnership Niles and Frazer Underneath all that interlectual pomposity there was some mad vibe going on between them Imagine them smashing each other with sherry glasses over a discussion about Europe or something

My dear Mr. Black, given the way historical, measured temperatures are forced to dance up and down at the whim of whichever climate alarmist happens to be manipulating them today, the only logical impossibility around here is that any scientific knowledge might ever be gleaned from the resulting «evidence».

Irma is now officially the most disastrous hurricane in the history of the world... But only if you're a radical Muslim or a climate alarmist or you work in the construction industry.

At a climate alarmist site I sometimes comment at, another person has said (full context here) Heartland pays me to «side - step, deflect, distract, obfuscate, and deny the truth» (that person being someone who — unless I've missed it somewhere — who has yet to dispute a solitary detail I have here at GelbspanFiles or in any of my online articles).

By now there are so many «let's pretends» in the climate alarmist narrative that it's hard for the average person to tell which aspects are pretend and which are actual.

As a prominent climate alarmist scientist determined recently in a peer reviewed paper:

To understand why I highly recommend taking time to enjoy this long - read interview about his life and highly distinguished career — the last part of which the liars, thugs and bullies of the climate alarmist establishment did everything in their power to ruin.

A bunch of climate alarmist scientists have written to President Obama urging him to use RICO legislation against corporations which may «knowingly have deceived the American people about the risks of climate change.»

The CIC response suggests what a serious problem the CIC has created by its climate alarmist propaganda.

That shock will be felt most especially by the world's climate alarmist Establishment, whose scientists and learned institutions have staked their reputation on the idea that CO2, not solar activity, is the prime driver of climate and that the planet is on a warming trend not a cooling one.

The trust was lost through the leading climate alarmist scientists being exposed as lying, cheating and stealing to advance their views.

The leading lights of the climate alarmist movement (who up until then were extremely popular) stacked the peer review panels, subverted the IPCC using tricks and «kited» citations, and in some cases even committed crimes.

And besides, I think it makes a nice contrast with a number of leading climate alarmist sites that do not accept comments or are Stalinist in purging dissent from them.

It's just kenny's usual knee - jerk reaction to truth being told about anti-science climate alarmist propaganda.

A low intellect appears to be a basic requirement of the climate alarmist crowd, and D. Socrates sets the bar.

But either way, it tells us a great deal about the climate alarmist supporters.

Like many other conference speakers and attendees, Secretary - General Ban cited the recent droughts, floods, and Tropical Storm Sandy as proof of the dire consequences of man - made global warming, even though many studies and scientists (including scientists who usually fall into the climate alarmist category) have stated that there is no evidence to support claims that «extreme weather» has been increasing in frequency and / or magnitude in recent years, or that extreme events (hurricanes, droughts, heat waves, etc.) have anything to do with increased CO2 levels.

It shows the dishonesty of the small group of climate sci - entists, desperate to preserve the gravy train of public funds generated by phoney climate alarmist claims.

I have a reputation out there of being some sort of climate alarmist, but I think there is a missing negative feedback.»

Presumably our gracious host Doc Carlin found the climate Alarmist narrative was counter to his own intelligence.

«Why Climate Alarmist «Environmentalists» Are the Enemies of Human Civilization and Plants The Enormous Costs of Remaking the US Electric Power System»

State Senate leader Kevin de Leon's quote in a recent article captures an astounding display of climate alarmist elitism that shrugs off as unimportant the huge yet unknown impacts of the states emission mandates on its 37 million residents.

Betts is using Lewandowsky's typical animus towards climate skeptical science as a cover to build an alt - history of climate alarmist science.

California's politically driven climate alarmist emissions reduction goals are meaningless and completely unnecessary and threaten to produce massive damage to the states economy and to the lives and freedoms of all of its 37 million citizens.

Lewandowsky is right — «pause» research percolated up into climate alarmist circles AFTER the skeptics addressed it.

Richard Betts tries to say Lewandowsky's wrong but instead of easily winning his argument by posting 100s of links to different pre-2013 climate alarmist papers about the «pause» he only links 1.

He identifies the chronology that skeptic science was addressing the «pause» well before the alarmists and characterises all that prior skeptic science as «seepage», akin to pollution of climate alarmist science.

This new objectively - based climate science undercuts the climate alarmist «consensus,» but also a few points often made by some climate skeptics.

Climate alarmist scientists speculated that global warming from human CO2 emissions would somehow cause the El Niño / La Niña climate cycle to become stuck in the El Niño mode.

It has been there since the beginning of the climate alarmist movement.

The idea that many other world countries that desire high energy growth using coal fuel regardless of the greenhouse gas emission levels are going to abandon their enormous existing use and future growth of coal fuel because of California's ridiculous climate alarmist driven schemes is totally absurd.

Want to win an argument with a climate alarmist?

The climate alarmist greenhouse effect is about the medium getting hotter than the source of heat, actually, about the medium making the source of heat hotter still.

I see no case whatsoever for drastic climate alarmist measures.

In the previous two posts (first, second) we have looked at the climate alarmist's «steel greenhouse» which they mathematically solve in such a way as to lead to what they think is an alarming behaviour about temperature, which they call... Continue reading →

As readers may know, Big Climate alarmist and self - garlanded Nobel Laureate Michael E Mann is suing me and others for mocking his hockey stick.

Imagine being able to ask a climate alarmist back in 1996 what it would take to change his mind.

Lefebvre, 65, has continued as a climate activist and blogger at the site, and has funded other climate alarmist venues and events since his guilty plea.

The adverse effects of climate alarmist policies are already evident in many developed nations, particularly in Western Europe, Australia, and Canada.

Fortunately, climate alarmist policies are not well advanced in the US, with some exceptions such as California.

They have shown that the climate alarmist science is invalid.

DeSmogBlog is a highly politicized climate alarmist website that attacks skeptics of catastrophic man - caused climate change and the organizations that support them.

The examples are found wherever climate alarmist ideology has been used to make energy - related decisions.

Though the paper's findings are not controversial — few serious scientists dispute the evidence of the temperature datasets showing that there has been little if any global warming for nearly 19 years — they represent a tremendous blow to the climate alarmist «consensus», which has long sought to deny the «Pause's» existence.

The «debate is over» attitude of the climate alarmist is so anti-science that it is appalling to me and it causes me to question their honesty.

Well, not unless you're a climate alarmist... As we know from long experience, if it had been the other way round — if the planet had warmed by 0.56 degrees C rather than cooled, the media would have been all over it.