«The witches themselves, however, were simply climate - change scapegoats...
The climate alarmist community is doing exactly the same thing.
Not exact matches
The first group of authors tries to label the
climate science
community as an army of influential catastrophists,
alarmists, and profiteers — glossing over the reality that the vast body of
climate science and
climate policy analysis is, as in any field, full of gradations (not to mention that there's not much evidence of substantial influence).
What skeptics are «skeptical» about is one or more of the bald assertions of the
alarmist community — usually that the current round of
climate changes are: abnormal, harmful, or (primarily) anthropogenic.
Every time
climate science has another crack at misanthropy the cool headed skeptics in the scientific
community become more determined to show the world just how much of a laughingstock they are, in my opinion, the «Man Made Global Warming»
alarmists are kicking a sleeping giant!
More important to the selection than the UA's staff actual ability to, you know, monitor the
climate is likely Jonathan Overpeck's impeccable credentials in the
alarmist community.
Chart # 1 is one that will never be shown by the establishment
climate science
community, nor by the
climate - doomsday
alarmists.
In your last sentence you refer to the
alarmists as «the
climate community.»
Even Britain's Hadley Centre for
Climate Prediction and Research, one of the leading sirens of the
alarmist community, had to concede late last month that, when it recalculated global temperatures for the past decade using the latest data and techniques, the average over the past 10 years had risen just 0.07 degrees centigrade, less than half the 0.2 degrees they and the UN had previously claimed.
Given these facts, what are the
alarmist community and the Democrats, whose platform hysterically calls
climate change «an urgent threat,» to do about research that has found that «much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue»?
In addition to globe trotting activist
alarmist scientists (some of whom are fully funded by tax dollats) failing miserably to» walk the talk» we also have political candidates issuing inane comments and sound bites regarding the absolute unanimity of the scientific
community worldwide regarding a certainty of anthropogenic catastrophic
climate change.