on, Dr. Victor noted that it matters who wins the White House; making progress in
climate and energy policy requires a certain style of governance and collaboration, along with the willingness to make these efforts a foreign policy priority.
Not exact matches
One recommendation by the alliance takes aim at Ontario government
energy policy that could also double as
climate policy, as the province has curtailed greenhouse gas emissions coming from the electricity sector by closing coal - fired power plants, invested in costly solar
and wind
energy projects,
and instituted a cap -
and - trade system that
requires businesses to buy permits to cover their carbon emissions.
FIGURE 3: State - Based
Climate and Renewable
Energy Policies in the United States Twenty - five states and the District of Columbia have independently enacted a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS), which require that a certain portion of the state's energy consumption come from renewable e
Energy Policies in the United States Twenty - five states
and the District of Columbia have independently enacted a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS), which
require that a certain portion of the state's
energy consumption come from renewable e
energy consumption come from renewable
energyenergy.
«Fighting
climate change successfully will certainly
require sensible government
policies to level the economic playing field between clean
and dirty
energy, such as putting a price on carbon dioxide emissions.
Almost all the experts I've talked to in 20 years of exploring the entwined
climate and energy challenges agree that satisfying global
energy demand while limiting human influence on
climate will
require revolutionary advances in both
policy and technology.
inferring support for
energy policy from the DoD interest in the above stated risks associated with
climate variability
and change
requires a big leap of logic.
Figure (right) shows the increase in
energy demand to 2030
and 2050, which
requires global
climate policy to leapfrog to low carbon
energy development pathways.
It is not the only legitimate
climate policy, the one true sign of seriousness on global warming, or a substitute for the difficult
and painstaking political work that will be
required to transition to a sustainable
energy system.
Solving the
climate crisis
requires political leadership that recognizes the serious reality of global warming
and fights for
policies that move us toward a clean
energy economy, not backward.
As the World
Energy Investment Outlook notes, it is only with «consistent and credible policies» that we can close the growing gap between energy investment today, and the investment required to meet growing energy demands while avoiding the worst impacts of climate c
Energy Investment Outlook notes, it is only with «consistent
and credible
policies» that we can close the growing gap between
energy investment today, and the investment required to meet growing energy demands while avoiding the worst impacts of climate c
energy investment today,
and the investment
required to meet growing
energy demands while avoiding the worst impacts of climate c
energy demands while avoiding the worst impacts of
climate change.
Not coincidentally, these
policy actions are the same as those
required to stabilize Earth's
energy balance
and keep the
climate near the Holocene
climate range in which civilization developed.
The European Commission's legislative proposals included in the «Clean
Energy for All Europeans» package published on 30 November 2016 are as a whole not consistent with the objectives of the Paris Agreement to keep temperature rise well below 2 °C and pursue efforts to limit it to 1.5 °C, which require the immediate overhaul of EU climate and energy pol
Energy for All Europeans» package published on 30 November 2016 are as a whole not consistent with the objectives of the Paris Agreement to keep temperature rise well below 2 °C
and pursue efforts to limit it to 1.5 °C, which
require the immediate overhaul of EU
climate and energy pol
energy policies.
Now that the Obama administration is pledging to act with urgency to respond to the threat of
climate change
and acknowledging that this
requires a commitment to a sustainable
energy system, administration
policy should be re-framed to show how it is driven by these commitments.
There is a strong consensus among
climate policy experts that expanding nuclear
energy is
required to cut CO2 emissions
and improve air quality.
Democrats recognize the importance of
climate leadership at the local level
and know that achieving our national clean
energy goals
requires an active partnership with states, cities,
and rural communities where so much of our country's
energy policy is made.
Energy and Environment: Repudiate the Paris
Climate Agreement Defund the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change Overturn or at Least Defund the EPA's Clean Power Plan Repeal the EPA's Purloined Power to Legislate
Climate Policy Repeal the EPA's Carbon Dioxide Standards for New Fossil - Fuel Power Plants Oppose Carbon Taxes Prohibit Use of Social Cost of Carbon as a Justification for Regulating Emissions Freeze
and Sunset the Renewable Fuel Standard
Require all Agencies to Meet Rigorous Scientific Standards Address Unaccountable Environmental Research Programs
We simply can not afford to continue producing dirty
energy at the rate we do now —
and that
requires the fossil fuel industry to stop selling deception
and stop blocking sensible
climate policies.
A review by the Center for
Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES) of five detailed studies published recently by various NGOs and federal energy forecasters (M.J. Bradley, the Energy Information Administration, the Bipartisan Policy Center, the Rhodium Group for the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and the Nicholas Institute) finds that the CPP will only require about an 18 percent emissions reduction beyond business - as - usual scenarios from now through
Energy Solutions (C2ES) of five detailed studies published recently by various NGOs
and federal
energy forecasters (M.J. Bradley, the Energy Information Administration, the Bipartisan Policy Center, the Rhodium Group for the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and the Nicholas Institute) finds that the CPP will only require about an 18 percent emissions reduction beyond business - as - usual scenarios from now through
energy forecasters (M.J. Bradley, the
Energy Information Administration, the Bipartisan Policy Center, the Rhodium Group for the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and the Nicholas Institute) finds that the CPP will only require about an 18 percent emissions reduction beyond business - as - usual scenarios from now through
Energy Information Administration, the Bipartisan
Policy Center, the Rhodium Group for the Center for Strategic
and International Studies,
and the Nicholas Institute) finds that the CPP will only
require about an 18 percent emissions reduction beyond business - as - usual scenarios from now through 2030.
It is clear that
climate change is a serious issue that
requires research for solutions
and effective
policies that allow us to meet our
energy needs while protecting the environment: that's why oil
and gas companies are working to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.
They are of course related insofar as
climate change
policies make
energy (
and therefore everything that
requires energy) more expensive.
Fighting
climate change successfully will
require sensible government
policies to level the economic playing field between clean
and dirty
energy, such as putting a...
A new article published in the online journal PLoS ONE takes on the issue of
energy sprawl — namely how much land is
required to produce
energy from different sources — under different potential US
energy and climate policies in 2030.
General knowledge of transportation,
energy,
and climate policy is also
required.
Investment - grade
climate change
and clean
energy policy is
required to shift private sector investment from high - carbon to low - carbon assets.
Clearly, Indonesia
requires a low emission pathway for coal to ensure the integration of
climate,
energy and economic
policy.
And where the old regime required that everyone band together around the same core motivation and goals, policymakers today are likely to make the most progress to the degree that they refrain from centrally justifying energy innovation, resilience to extreme weather, and pollution reduction as «climate policy.&raq
And where the old regime
required that everyone band together around the same core motivation
and goals, policymakers today are likely to make the most progress to the degree that they refrain from centrally justifying energy innovation, resilience to extreme weather, and pollution reduction as «climate policy.&raq
and goals, policymakers today are likely to make the most progress to the degree that they refrain from centrally justifying
energy innovation, resilience to extreme weather,
and pollution reduction as «climate policy.&raq
and pollution reduction as «
climate policy.»