Sentences with phrase «climate change because»

It is widely recognised that Indigenous communities are much more vulnerable to climate change because of the social and economic disadvantage Indigenous communities already face: [24]

Steiner said governments and individuals should not ignore climate change because of current crises over soaring food and oil prices.

Was the ozone threat more tangible for people compared with climate change because of personal safety concerns like skin cancer and cataracts?

«I believe the oil and gas companies are making investments and exploring innovations around climate change because they see a potential end to their existing business model if they try to maintain the status quo,» Krzus said.

The region is particularly vulnerable to climate change because of population levels that place mounting resource demands on an already degraded natural resource base.

Cities have emerged as first responders to climate change because they experience the impacts of natural disasters firsthand and because they produce up to 70 percent of greenhouse gas emissions.

Children play an important role of the solution of climate change because they have a profound understanding about the environment».

Calvin Beisner, the founder of the Cornwall Alliance and one of the main people behind the attack on Pope Francis's anticipated climate and sustainability - focused encyclical, states in a recent video that he is an authority on the issued of climate change because he has «read some 50 books... on the science of climate change.»

He frames the talk as a result of a challenge issued on Twitter — he was debating some prominent left - leaning commentators who said they always shy away from discussing climate change because they don't know enough about the complex issue to defend the position that we should be addressing it.

AUSTRALIANS» homes can help fight the threat of climate change because the timber in the houses stores lots of carbon, research shows.

One NASA oceanographer told Scientific American that the world's seas, not surface temperatures, should be the current barometer of climate change because their temperatures are going up «like gangbusters.»

But the point was: It is wrong to suggest that real - world development - related policy decisions are routinely based on very precise predictions of future problems, and that we can not act on climate change because the models do not meet these alleged standards.

The whole paper is irrelevant in the context of a climate change because it missed a very central point.

In a new paper excerpted at Climate Progress he explains that «All weather events are affected by climate change because the environment in which they occur is warmer and moister than it used to be,» then moves on to discuss tornadoes in particular:

They may begin to care about climate change because it is going to make their condition worse in the future.

Example — in the area of food security, it's claimed spoilage of food will increase from climate change because people will be too stupid to refrigerate or keep cool food products.

Coral reefs, which are already under threat from overfishing and tourism, are especially vulnerable to climate change because they are easily affected by warm water.

If we fight for climate change because we care about human lives, then we should also support Black Lives Matter, because we care about human lives.

Stormwater mitigation is particularly important in this era of climate change because major storms are becoming severe and frequent.

Smil claims that there has been «no global warming in the past ten years» and appears to suggest that we can safely ignore the problem of climate change because it won't hit with «full force» any time soon, and its full impact is as yet unknown.

We may have to accept Fairfax as the voice of unreason on climate change because of their left wing bias, with the Murdoch stable the ultimate winners.

The youth voice needs to be heard in the decisions our leaders are making in combating the effects of climate change because it is our youth that will inherit the consequences of the decisions we make.

On February 11th, Center for Regulatory Effectiveness requested that the United States Global Change Research Program and the Office of Science and Technology withdraw the First National Assessment on Global Climate Change because it violates the objectivity, utility and reproducibility requirements of the Data Quality Act and OMB's guidelines implementing the Act.

I'm also an ex-journalist — should journalists also not be allowed to write about climate change because they aren't climatologists?

For example, northern temperate regions generally benefit from climate change because higher temperatures extend their growing season.

Most climate advocates know someone who rides a bike as their primary form of transportation and many climate advocates regularly commute by bicycle, but don't see bicycling as a relevant solution to climate change because bicycling doesn't get you huge and immediate reductions in carbon pollution.

The social foundations of children's mental and physical health and well - being are threatened by climate change because of: effects of sea level rise and decreased biologic diversity on the economic viability of agriculture, tourism, and indigenous communities; water scarcity and famine; mass migrations; decreased global stability46; and potentially increased violent conflict.47 These effects will likely be greatest for communities already experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage.48

Community matters when we are looking for responses to peak oil and climate change because of the power that emerges from working together and creating meaningful change through shared action.

Leaking refrigerants are a major cause of climate change because they predominantly consist of two families of synthetic manmade chemicals called hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs)-- both ozone depleting substances and super greenhouse gases (GHGs)-- and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)-- powerful GHGs...

However, that said, it is clear that surface temperatures are not a robust metric for climate change because they respond to ENSO events.

Rogoff says the state and the nation have an ideal opportunity now to respond to international challenges presented by climate change because the U.S. representative to the Arctic Council, retired Coast Guard Admiral Joseph Papp, is about to assume chairmanship of the council.

First, the students are told that there is no consensus on climate change because it is too complicated for scientists to figure out, then they are told that we need to prepare for cooling!

Slum dwellers in developing countries tend to be most vulnerable to climate change because they live along river banks, on slopes prone to landslides, near polluted grounds, on desertified land, in unstable structures, and along coastal waterfronts.

This power plant has the potential to be a key ally in the fight against climate change because it provides a way to get rid of CO2 emissions.

The old story line: People need to worry about climate change because doubling the atmosphere's concentration of carbon dioxide relative to its preindustrial level would probably raise global average temperatures by 2.7 to 8 degrees Fahrenheit.

«It is not possible to criticise the new Coalition policy on climate change because it does not exist,» Mr Turnbull wrote in an opinion column in 2009.

Sea level rise is the greatest potential threat to civilization posed by climate change because so many of us live near the coast.

Pauses are expected in the warming record because of natural variation that can add to or subtract from decadal climate change because that is only tenths of a degree.

As we have seen, the developed nations had agreed in the UNFCCC that they should take the lead in reducing the threat of climate change because they were mostly responsible for the build up of ghg in the atmosphere and Kyoto was understood to be a modest initial step toward a global solution.

Politically President Obama's hands were tied in regard to his ability to commit to issues of interest to those nations most vulnerable to climate change because of domestic political constraints.

Global warming is now disguised as climate change because it totally failed to hoodwink the gullible.

Humans are the main cause of climate change because were the one who burn fossil fuels that contribute large amount which releases carbon dioxide gas to the atmosphere and clear trees that absorb carbon dioxide, sending heat trapping gases into the atmosphere.

Others, just dropped out from acting on climate change because of work or life.

Attribution of past short term events such as the MWP and LIA will always be more difficult than with current climate change because the further back we go the less data we have, both regarding the extent of the changes that took place and the various factors which were in play.

If our polluting activities have nothing to do with the hurricanes than why France's President Francois Hollande during its recent visit in the Philippines called for more actions in order to stop climate change because he said that Typhoon Hagupit and Typhoon Hayan which devastated the region become that big and dangerous due to our polluting activities which brings the planet on the brink of disaster.

Too many environmental groups have embraced climate change because it is «on the side of good» and are willing to put that before fact.

Nations or sub-national governments may not look to their domestic economic interests alone to justify their response to climate change because they must also comply with their duties, responsibilities, and obligations to others to prevent climate - change caused harms.

Over and over again opponents of climate change policies have argued that nations need not act to reduce the threat of climate change because there are scientific uncertainties about the magnitude and timing of human - induced climate change impacts.

It is our belief that «theory leads experiment» on climate change because all well - accepted atmospheric models predict a temperature rise.

Though scientific consensus must always be open to responsible skepticism given: (a) the strength of the consensus on this topic, (b) the enormity of the harms predicted by the consensus view, (c) an approximately 30 year delay in taking action that has transpired since a serious climate change debate began in the United States in the early 1980s, (d) a delay that has made the problem worse while making it more difficult to achieve ghg emissions reductions necessary to prevent dangerous climate change because of the steepness of reductions now needed, no politician can ethically justify his or her refusal to support action on climate change based upon a personal opinion that is not supported by strong scientific evidence that has been reviewed by scientific organizations with a wide breadth of interdisciplinary scientific expertise.