Sentences with phrase «climate change deniers take»

In an ideal world, the paper would make climate change deniers take notice.

Not exact matches

Today in between accusing Cameron of speaking «total nonsense» and of appointing «climate change deniers», the Labour leader briefly took the time to agree with Cameron's support for taking action on climate change.

Cuomo took issue with anyone who might deny climate change — saying Sandy and other major storms serve as proof.

Some climate change deniers have taken encouragement from the pause, saying they show warming predictions are flawed, but Mann, a co-author on the study, notes that «there have been various explanations for why [the slowdown is happening], none of which involve climate models being fundamentally wrong.»

Among other changes, it is likely that climate change denier James Inhofe (R - OK) will take over Environment and Public Works.

«It would be especially unfortunate if this took the next step and became law, as it might give momentum to antievolution forces and forces that seek to deny the reality of climate change.»

Maybe if we could take all the skeptics / deniers into near earth orbit and let them have that same profound moment we could actually make some headway on the climate change predicament we are in.

«While the federal government abdicates its responsibility on climate change, governors do not have the luxury of denying a scientific reality, and it is more important than ever for states to take collective, common sense action,» Governor Cuomo said.

By which I mean the denialism of a world in which, though the dangers of climate change are simply too ridiculous to deny, they still — somehow — are not taken to imply courage, and reckoning, and mobilization.

Many people are predicting the Republicans — who overwhelmingly deny climate change even exists; it's become something of a party plank on the right — may take control of the Senate.

Just as Lewandowsky couldn't take the perspectives of climate sceptics in good faith — he had to probe inside their minds, using a shoddy internet survey — Read does not take issue with the arguments actually offered by actual climate change - denying libertarians, he takes issue with his own fantasy libertarian, abandoning all the rigour and practice that the discipline he belongs to has established over the course of millennia, to score cheap rhetorical points.

And we should see in Monbiot's appeal to «psychologists and cognitive linguists» precisely the same impulse as the one that drove Stephan Lewandowsky et al to take issue with the structure of climate change deniers» brains, rather than their argument.

«There are a lot of politicians who will deny the reality of climate change, but there are very few who will take the extra step and personally attack scientists studying the issue.»

With climate change denier Donald Trump to take office as the next US President, is there still anything positive to look forward to in the energy and climate world?

Kate Sheppard at Mother Jones reported on October 12, 2011 in Perry Officials Censored Climate Change Report that «Rick Perry takes Texas pride in being a climate change denier — and his administration acts accordingly.Climate Change Report that «Rick Perry takes Texas pride in being a climate change denier — and his administration acts accordingly.&Change Report that «Rick Perry takes Texas pride in being a climate change denier — and his administration acts accordingly.climate change denier — and his administration acts accordingly.&change denier — and his administration acts accordingly.»

Soft - pedaling such threats can take the form of the National Park Service denying the human role in climate change by aggressively editing out all references to that role in its report on sea level rise and storm surge.

Just as they can take one cold day and say it contradicts the decades - long, global pattern of climate change, climate deniers are constantly prioritizing the here - and - now over the future.

In 2003, Professor Ross McKitrick is known for his opposition to the Endangered Species Act in Canada, and is the author of Taken By Storm, which denies climate change.

None of the funds made available to the Environmental Protection Agency by this division or any other Act may be expended for purposes of enforcing or promulgating any regulation (other than with respect to section 202 of the Clean Air Act) or order, taking action relating to, or denying approval of state implementation plans or permits because of the emissions of greenhouse gases due to concerns regarding possible climate change.

Instead of granting the petition and taking advantage of the opportunity, Ecology denied the petition claiming that it was doing enough to address climate change, even though its own documents said exactly the opposite.

Heartland has denied the health effects of tobacco smoke while taking millions of dollars from tobacco corporations, and currently denies the cause and effects of global climate change, while being paid by major carbon polluters like the oil and gas industry and Nucor.

The show — I Can Change Your Mind About Climate Change — took a climate science denier and a climate advocate around theClimate Change — took a climate science denier and a climate advocate around theclimate science denier and a climate advocate around theclimate advocate around the world.

... the «coalition» created by Philip Morris, was the first and most important of the corporate - funded organisations denying that climate change is taking place.

Even climate - change deniers will still take the advice of oncologists, and will still express criticism of climate - change policies in scientific terms.

Even climate change deniers will still take the advice of oncologists, and will still express criticism of climate change policies in scientific terms.

In reality, those who deny climate change and demand a halt to emissions reduction and mitigation work, want us to take a huge gamble with the future of every human being on the planet, every future human being, our children and grand children, and every other living species.

«The platform makes for the starkest possible contrast with a party that just nominated Donald Trump — a man who has called climate change a hoax invented by and for the Chinese, who has denied basic reality such as the drought in California, and who has vowed to (try to) scuttle the unanimous agreement by the world's nations in Paris to take whatever measures are necessary to avert catastrophic warming and keep total warming «well below 2 °C.»

The Post notes that ALEC takes issue with the label «climate change denier,» after the group's work doing just that led to the departures of major corporate supporters.

Two organizations got letters from ALEC's lawyers, insinuating there would be legal action taken for accurately describing ALEC's legacy of denying climate change.

That the researcher responsible for the study is clearly not a «climate change denier» makes the IPCC's credibility gap all the more significant, and it raises new questions regarding the fundamental credibility of any claim coming from an organization which has relied on shaky science to back its demand for the power to take $ 76 trillion from the economies of the industrialized world and «redistribute» those funds for «green technologies» in the third world.

Murty was a signatory to a 2006 open letter to Prime Minister Stephen Harper that denied the existence of climate change while urging that no actions be taken on climate policy.

Take a look at the cabinet stocked with deniers who have taken a sledgehammer to the sound but wholly inadequate policies in place for tackling climate change.

In other words, if you want to know why Climategate is interesting, don't look for the source of the leak / hack and question the «ethics» of climate «deniers»; take a long, hard look at the «ethics», and the politics of those who have worked to deny a public debate about climate change.

And to those who still deny it, I'll note that it's better to take the carrot than the stick: Some people are proposing siccing the RICO Act on corporations actively suppressing global warming and climate change information.

«Because the government is sort of in the pocket of the fossil fuel industry and you have a core of climate deniers that threaten the prime minister's leadership, there's a political imperative to not take serious action on climate change,» says Dr Casule.

Like the tobacco industry, climate change deniers devote great time and energy to keeping the «debate» alive hoping that the general public will believe that the science is unsettled, thereby minimising public support for taking action to address greenhouse gas emissions.

Supporters of a new ecocide law also believe it could be used to prosecute «climate deniers» who distort science and facts to discourage voters and politicians from taking action to tackle global warming and climate change.

Climate deniers pored over hundreds of pages of emails and seized on a few remarks they took out of context in a fruitless attempt to prove that climate change isn'Climate deniers pored over hundreds of pages of emails and seized on a few remarks they took out of context in a fruitless attempt to prove that climate change isn'climate change isn't real.

Lomborg and Gingrich take Republicans to task for denying the reality of climate change.

Supporters of Heartland will be surprised to learn that we «worked with the tobacco company Philip Morris to question or deny the health risks of secondhand smoke and to lobby against smoking bans,» that we «support climate change denial,» or that our decision to spin off our work on finance and insurance into the R Street Institute is characterized as the «resignation of almost the entire Heartland Washington D.C. office, taking the Institute's biggest project (on insurance) with it.»

The society had sent an official letter to Exxon, complaining about the oil company's «inaccurate and misleading» portrayal of the science of climate change and about its funding of lobby groups that deny global warming is taking place.

Why, if military researchers are saying climate change is already a theat [sic] to the security of the United States, are you igoring [sic] this threat and even denying climate change is taking place?

The play takes a harsh view of Climate Change Deniers.

What do you say to climate - change deniers who don't believe we need to take responsibility for global warming?

2 of my brief comments used sarcasm to satirize the idiocy of climate change deniers, one pointed out that Galileo took on deniers of the Earth orbiting the Sun and one was pure amazement that you could find and post another's IP address publicly.

We don't have to create an entire command economy to take a big stick to a company that actively delayed a response to global warming by funding climate change deniers, that continues to fight payment of damages for despoiling the Prince William Sound after 20 years, and has proved again and again it can't be trusted to protect our environment.

That's why those who oppose taking action to curb climate change have engaged in a misinformation campaign to deny the existence of the expert consensus.

The famously climate change - denying James Inhofe is taking control of the Senate's environment panel.

Having been set up by Philip Morris, TASSC «was the first and most important of the corporate - funded organisations denying that climate change is taking place.

And finally, Stewart rounds out the program with a nice interview with Energy Secretary Steven Chu — they talk global climate change, white roofs, energy efficiency, and how Chu takes on climate deniers.