Not exact matches
The greatest threat is not from
climate change but from the hubris to build so much
in regions where we
know hurricanes will continue to land.
She has had experiences with reporters who thought the scientific community «didn't
know anything» when she expressed caveats and uncertainty around a complex topic (such as how mosquito - borne diseases
in the U.S. - Mexico border
region may be affected by
climate change).
No matter what mechanism the United States ultimately decides to employ
in addressing
climate change, it must be implemented
in a way that minimizes costs and recognizes the impacts on different
regions of the country, like my home state of West Virginia.
Knowing that is key to understanding how
climate change is affecting methane releases
in the polar
region, said Shakhova.
What I am saying is that they used a regional
climate model which did not include the
changes in the Arctic
region, and the boundary conditions they used were those predicted using GCMs that we
know got the Arctic ice wrong!
But like Jeff, I would like to
know why the Times doesn't believe reporting more on the actual impacts of
climate change (higher wheat prices, persistent political destabilization
in climate impacted
regions, etc....)
Scientists say the record drought is due
in part to the expansion of the Hadley Cell — the atmospheric
regions on both sides of the equator that circulates warm tropical air poleward — which is
known climate change signal.
Are the
climate engineers trying to create the illusion of a season
change that is
no longer naturally occurring
in many
regions due to rapidly rising temperatures?
Researchers at The University of Texas at Austin have found that a well -
known period of abrupt
climate change 12000 years ago occurred rapidly
in northern latitudes but much more gradually
in equatorial
regions, a discovery that could prove important for understanding and responding to future
climate change.
Say I have data on average precipitation for the last 30 years
in the Southwest United States, as well as simulations from 20 different
climate models of current and future precipitation
in the same
region, and I want to
know what the expected
change in precipitation will be at the end of this century under a specific emissions scenario.
When you strip away the rhetoric, the experts
know little about the future severity of
climate change and even less about the future physical impact
in particular countries or
regions.
The experts will be able to form an integrated evaluation based on
changes already observed, the processes
known to influence the regional
climate of interest, and projections from those models that have demonstrated accuracy
in describing that
region's
climate — all to a degree consistent with the kind of projection required.
«
No one can predict the future, but if the
region's past 900 years is any indication, and you factor
in climate change, you're going to have a warmer situation that could mean the river will
no longer be a sustainable water source for the tar sands,» he said.
Pabitra Mukhopadhyay: When it becomes clear that the increasing risk of GLOFs is the outcome of a global trend
in climate change and when it is
known that the Hindu Kush Himalayan
Region has far too many retreating glaciers leaving far too many glacial lakes that may turn into GLOFs, two realities emerge: No single [continue reading...]
The team now expects
climate change to severely diminish these cold
regions by halfway through the century,
no matter what course of action we take
in the meantime.