Sentences with phrase «climate change theories»

Once climate researchers develop better theories, it will guide them toward the set of true explanatory variables and the role of CO2 in climate change theories will be greatly diminished.

I invite Senator Boxer to talk to any number of scientists who oppose the climate change theories promoted by this administration: Will Happer, Martin Fricke, Roger Cohen, Lorraine Yapps Cohen, who I have interviewed over the years in an effort to actually offer a counter to the «consensus» inanity promulgated by progressives.

If I created a think tank whose only purpose is to challenge climate change theories not because I don't think climate change doesn't exist, but because I want to improve the scientific field, would my think tank be considered part of CCCM?

David Evans has a superb track record of dodgy claims and bizarre climate change theories.

In October 1998, CEI staff figured prominently in a press advisory sent to reporters by the conservative Media Research Center, offering them as «credible sources» who can show that «many scientists are skeptical of climate change theories,» «a warmer earth may be a prosperous earth,» «global warming policies would harm the US economy,» and «the Kyoto protocol could undermine US national security.»

We believe that by educating the public about the fallacies of climate change theories and the Kyoto Protocol, we can weaken political support for Kyoto implementation.»

Studies estimate that over 25 % of the population suffers from allergic disorders and climate change theories suggest the problem is growing.

«Rainfall trends in arid regions buck commonly held climate change theories.»

Someone wants to bring up their conspiracy theory about the globalist origins of the climate change theory?

The authors conclude that «the data strongly support the view that human emissions play an important role in climate change and represent a key test for climate change theory.»

Micro methane producing green waste conversion - although combustion and not energy appears to be the culprit in the climate change theory.

Dr. Anastasios Tsonis co-author of the UW - Milwaukee peer - reviewed paper in March 2009, touted as a study which» Could Realign Climate Change Theory ``.

'' Could Realign Climate Change Theory ``.

He explains how he once thought that climate change theory was based solely on computer models, where in fact it's based on scientific measurements of both modern and ancient climates.

It might be interesting to some readers of this site to know that Crichton's comparison of global climate change theory to eugenics in Appendix I of his novel was adapted without attribution from an essay by Richard Lindzen, «Science and Politics: Global Warming and Eugenics,» which appeared in R.W. Hahn, Ed., Risks, Costs, and Lives Saved, (American Enterprise Institute, 1996).

I am not a rabid carbon - hating enviromaniac, but I nonetheless do have some serious reservations about the American conservative stance against climate change theory and Mr. Lomborg's objectivity of thought.

«But as I commented at scienceprogress, the way I see the ledger, the religious Right gets a handful of anti-science points for views on evolution (and related rationalizations about the age of the earth, etc.), and for some dismissal of climate change theory, but the Left gets many more anti-science points for exaggerating the health and ecological risks of POPs; DDT; GMOs; plastics and plasticizers; pesticide residues; conventional agriculture; low - dose EM radiation; high - tension powerlines; climate change; population growth; resource depletion; chemical sweeteners; species extinction rates; biodiversity decline; and I'm sure the list could go on.

H. Leighton Steward, chairman of the non-profit Plants Need CO2, noted that many of the former NASA scientists harbored doubts about the significance of the C02 - climate change theory and have concerns over NASA's advocacy on the issue.

If you wonder why the anthropogenic climate change theory («global warming») is losing credibility among the general population, you need not look any further than articles and statements such as your recent paper.

Scientists: «Loud Divergence Between Sea Level Reality And Climate Change Theory» Global Sea Level «Acceleration» Just 0.002 mm / year ² According to peer - reviewed, «consensus» climate science, anthropogenic CO2 emissions are the cause of Arctic sea ice decline.

There's a rhetorical trope popular among environmentalists that being skeptical about Global Warming / Climate Change theory is like being skeptical about gravity.

Her unsophisticated chain of reasoning posits that because Nazis killed millions of people and some scientists have speculated that climate change could kill millions of people, scepticism of climate change theory is the equivalent of denying the holocaust.

Last spring, Politifact found it less than credible evidence that climate change theory is wrong.

Mann's puerile response to a recent editorial about climate change theory by Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer is to advocate swigging alcohol every time he encounters an idea in it he finds offensive.

That was my first introduction to the Climate Change theory, and I started to develop some interest.

Psychoanalysis and anthropogenic climate change theory belong together.

Is that a reason then that climate change theory based on co2 is wrong as you and the rest of this site would have it?

* (For a good reason, too — there are so inordinately few somewhat qualified or learned and somewhat credentialed individuals on this subject who take the manufactured «anti Climate Change theory: view one that should be pursued by nearly every scientist on the planet were it to have merit, as it is a far better end result if true, yet nevertheless is not, but persists in fact due to the enormous ideological, macroeconomically frightened (and myopically presumptive), and «good thing going» industry based pressures, behind it.)

Candidly, citing the likes of Mörner and Scafetta to support a claim of «loud divergence between sea - level reality and climate change theory» won't help to «establish very high standards for the journal.»

The loud divergence between sea - level reality and climate change theory — the climate models predict an accelerated sea - level rise driven by the anthropogenic CO2 emission — has been also evidenced in other works such as Boretti (2012a, b), Boretti and Watson (2012), Douglas (1992), Douglas and Peltier (2002), Fasullo et al. (2016), Jevrejeva et al. (2006), Holgate (2007), Houston and Dean (2011), Mörner 2010a, b, 2016), Mörner and Parker (2013), Scafetta (2014), Wenzel and Schröter (2010) and Wunsch et al. (2007) reporting on the recent lack of any detectable acceleration in the rate of sea - level rise.

Does publishing an article refuting a legit error in a fringe climate change theory bring the whole think tank as part of CCCM?

However, mounting evidence against climate change theory and the «consensus» is unlikely to stem the tide of policy designed to combat global warming, thanks to the sheer size of the climate change industry that has built up over the last few decades.

Over time, the public will start to remember dozens of so - called problems with the anthropogenic climate change theory.

Such as turning the «pause» into some sort of important refutation, or great mitigation of, the the basic climate change theory — see middle part: http://theworldofairaboveus.blogspot.com/2014/10/the-crux-of-climate-change-issue-and.html

As reported for The New American at that time, the IPCC's claim that the Himalayan glaciers were likely to melt away within decades seemed extreme even for those who subscribed to the climate change theory; the fact that the IPCC's claim relied on one scientist, whose study of the Himalayan glaciers had not even undergone peer review, raised a scandal:

Such as turning the «pause» into some sort of important refutation, or great mitigation of, the the basic climate change theory — see middle part:»

For the refuter (and Curry's) «argument» has been to simply attack Climate Change theory advancement.

How Freezing Temperatures are Starting to Shatter Climate Change Theory By Daily Mail Reporter In the freezing foothills of Montana, a distinctly bitter blast of revolution hangs in the air.

I don't know, I'm not part of that conspiracy, and I see a lot of assertions on here and elsewhere by people who imply they are smart, or at least smart enough to know more on this issue than the climate scientists who actually professionally study it, who throw around large highfalutin science terms, but that repeatedly misconstrue the basic climate change issue itself, conflate the process of science with Climate Change refutation, seem to have an extensively poor understanding of the issue, and take small select bits of data as part of the ongoing total picture of increasing overall corroboration, to falsely equate that with a flaw in Climate Change theory itself, or as a referendum on it.

Anyway there is an equal constant release of papers and reports opposing anthropogenic climate change theory.

First, it completely ignores the fact that there is a more or less constant release of papers and reports in support of anthropogenic climate change theory

It may confuse the issue, but there are lefties who criticise climate change theory and republicans who support it.

Climate change theory is deeply embedded in government; there is no will to make an exhibit of it, as this would amount to government exposing itself.

The political innuendo game would seem to be based (if at all) on socio - political / psycho - social models that I imagine are much less well validated than climate change theory.

Commenting on criticism of the Lavoisier Group by Clive Hamilton, the Cooler Heads Coalition notes that «Hamilton accuses the Lavoisier Group of painting the UN's global warming negotiations as «an elaborate conspiracy in which hundreds of climate scientists have twisted their results to support the climate change theory in order to protect their research funding» and adds, «Sounds plausible to us.»

Comparison between current observed climate and the climate record reveals nothing that calls for the development of an Anthropogenic Climate Change theory.

The recently released Copenhagen Diagnosis is a compendium of the most current, peer - reviewed science behind climate change theory.

Along the way the two meteorologists worked out a climate change theory.

It's clear that this comparison is just another way to scare the masses into believing the climate change theory that Huhne and his cohorts are spreading.

Not exact matches

At the intersection of cloud computing and energy conservation, the field excites both tech geeks and climate - change warriors alike, but much of it remains in the theory stage.