Not exact matches
One so misses the days when an actual
conversation with someone open - mindedly skeptical of the
climate change problem was possible that one tries to engage anyone who
seems articulate.
Suggested Topic:
Conversations about
climate and sustainability
seem to have a way of making no progress.
It all scans very well, though it might also be time for someone to write a paper about the surly geologists, who also
seem to feel that they have been left out of the
climate conversation (and who have certainly been left out of the IPCC loop).
In general,
conversations about «
climate»
seem to focus on controlling / regulating or preparing people for a
climate of the far future when the most
climate - vulnerable people aren't well - prepared for fluctuational events in the
climate of maybe next year or maybe next decade, no matter how strong or weak AGW effects are.
I would be most happy to have a
conversation about this subject and also to discuss site and tree selection, and
climate response — questions that
seem to be of interest here.
Her rather conventional media studies advisor writes health related articles for The
Conversation and doesn't
seem to otherwise be a
climate related academic.
And open and informed
conversation seems crucial to Randers's project — indeed, he posits that unchecked
climate change is not a technological problem, but a political one.
He talks about how stuck the country's
conversation about
climate change has been, but how for the first time in a long time, it
seems that might change.
It certainly
seems that he has an ideal window by which to do so: After the wave of extreme weather events last year, the tide of public opinion is again turning towards accepting
climate change — and towards being open to have a
conversation about solutions.