Sentences with phrase «climate debate divides»

2007/04/18: BBC: First climate debate divides UN The United Nations Security Council has held its first ever debate on climate change with some members arguing it was not the place for such a discussion.

There is a further problem here, in that the climate debate divides on another axis, between the argument about whether or not «anthropogenic climate change is happening», and what its consequences are.

Not exact matches

By bridging the perceived divide between religion and science, these unique voices have the potential to fundamentally alter the climate debate.

The refusal to admit questions of degree into the climate debate is a sure sign that the debate is neither as clearly divided as Mann claims, nor that science can resolve it simply.

He had begun his film with a preconceived idea about the climate debate, as one divided into two camps — sceptics and deniers — disagreeing about a single proposition: «climate change is happening».

As is discussed here often, the most powerful misconception of the climate debate is that is divides on the proposition «climate change is happening».

Hence, Mann pretends first that the debate divides on the meaningless proposition, «climate change is real», and then that it is a matter of science vs anti science.

-LSB-...] simply improving the clarity of scientific information will not dispel public conflict so long as the climate - change debate continues to feature cultural meanings that divide citizens of opposing world - views.

Climate Depot «Bridges the Climate Divide»: «Thanks to Morano, people on opposite sides of debate are now hearing each other out»

Climate Depot «Bridges the Climate Divide»: «Thanks to Morano, people on opposite sides of debate are now hearing each other out» — Morano's «got a huge audience and platform.

The mistake Nurse makes in his treatment of the climate debate is to imagine that it is divided over a simple claim that «climate change is happening».

The mistake Nurse made in his treatment of the climate debate is to imagine that it is divided over a simple claim that «climate change is happening».

The strategy is to divide conservative candidates and moderate voters; framing conservatives as standing on the morally wrong side of the climate change issue; as they have been portrayed in the gay marriage and Civil Rights debates.9 The NextGen campaign applies a master narrative that is adapted to each state, emphasizing that climate change poses a serious threat to the economy, public health, and children, and that if a candidate doesn't believe in climate change, they can't be trusted.

The debate wasn't divided between climate science and its critics.

It has always been defended on that tired old notion that the debate about climate policy divides on the fact of climate change, between scientists who claim «climate change is real» and deniers who claim the opposite.

The climate change debate, as it discussed in the mainstream media, appears to be divided into two major sides.

The unusual public tiff between two powerful GOP lawmakers highlights the sharp divide that drives the nation's climate change debate.

He would know that the debate is not binary, does not divide neatly into two camps, but that at the very least, the excesses of climate alarmists within and without the IPCC, which are further from the «consensus» and greater in consequence than anything uttered by climate change «deniers».

Nuccitelli's survey results are either the result of a comprehensive failure to understand the climate debate, or an attempt to divide it in such a way as to frame the result for political ends.

AP (4/28/13) reports: «The Environmental Protection Agency has dramatically lowered its estimate of how much of a potent heat - trapping gas leaks during natural gas production, in a shift with major implications for a debate that has divided environmentalists: Does the recent boom in fracking help or hurt the fight against climate change?»

Why climate change divides us — CS Monitor — thoughtful exploration of tribal nature of climate debate.

It divides the debate into two simple camps, one attached to the claim «climate change is happening», the other its denial.

The debate divides on this presupposition, not the «scientific» fact of climate change.

Just as Donald and Painter's evidence to the STC reflected either naivety or a strategy, Nuccitelli's survey results are either the result of a comprehensive failure to understand the climate debate, or an attempt to divide it in such a way as to frame the result for political ends.