Two different federal judges took a dim view of arguments like those that have been advanced by New York's AG as part of
his climate fraud investigation into Exxon Mobil.
The oil company loses its home court advantage before a sympathetic judge who has voiced skepticism over
the climate fraud investigations by state attorneys general.
Ebell Educates State Attorney Generals About Climate Denial: In 2016, the Center for Media and Democracy, publisher of Sourcewatch, obtained audio from an private, undisclosed meeting [6] with the Republican Attorneys General Association (RAGA) where Ebell spewed climate denial to Republican AG's and urged them to continue pushing back against
the climate fraud investigations.
Not exact matches
AG Eric Schniederman's
fraud investigation into ExxonMobile is focused less on the distant past than on relatively recent statements by the company related to
climate change and what it means for its future.
Meanwhile, lawmakers, presidential candidates,
climate scientists and environmentalists increasingly are calling for federal
investigations of Exxon under racketeering and securities
fraud statutes.
(Nine
investigations of Mann's
climate research, including one by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and another by the National Science Foundation, have found no evidence of academic
fraud.
Smith's most dramatic rush to the legal defense of the fossil fuel industry was his unprecedented move last year to issue subpoenas to two state attorneys general and several nongovernmental advocacy groups over the states»
climate change
fraud investigation of Exxon.
Christopher Horner, an attorney who claims that the earth is cooling, is known within the scientific community for hounding
climate change researchers with relentless
investigations and public ridicule, often deriding scientists as «communists» and
frauds.
When Mr. Schneiderman launched the
investigation back in 2015, he argued that Exxon Mobil may have committed
fraud by failing to broadly announce the results of research conducted by its own scientists on the contribution of fossil fuel combustion to
climate change in the 1970s and 1980s.
At the United Nations Intergovernmental Committee on
Climate Change (UN IPCC) Conference in Bali in mid December, Lord Christopher Monckton, an international business consultant specializing in the investigation of scientific frauds, a former adviser to UK prime minister Margaret Thatcher and presenter of the 90 - minute climate movie Apoc
Climate Change (UN IPCC) Conference in Bali in mid December, Lord Christopher Monckton, an international business consultant specializing in the
investigation of scientific
frauds, a former adviser to UK prime minister Margaret Thatcher and presenter of the 90 - minute
climate movie Apoc
climate movie Apocalypse?
That plan came to light during a hearing in Exxon's battle with Schneiderman over his office's
investigation into whether the company violated consumer
fraud laws in connection with
climate change - related disclosures.
The New York and Massachusetts
investigations focus on whether past statements by Exxon questioning
climate change science and downplaying its risks to the company constituted a form of
fraud against its shareholders or the public.
With the start of the Trump administration only a few weeks away, bringing in a new era of leadership unlikely to condone further
fraud (and in fact may pursue
investigations of), it has the establishment
climate science truly running scared.
Exhibit D: The
investigation recently launched by New York State Attorney General against Exxon Mobil for
climate - related
fraud.