Sentences with phrase «climate models paper»

Not one of these four authors received a dime in grants or other payments for researching and writing their climate models paper.

Charles points to Reilly et al., US agriculture and climate change: new results — that's a 2003 climate model paper.

3.2 Climate modelling papers that talks about emission scenarios and subsequent warming or other climate impacts from increased CO2 in the abstract implicitly endorse that GHGs cause warming

Not exact matches

A. David McGuire, U.S. Geological Survey senior scientist and climate system modeling expert with the University of Alaska Fairbanks Institute of Arctic Biology, is lead author of the paper.

«This paper is another example of how surprisingly complex the climate system is, how interrelated or interconnected all the parts are, and how difficult it is to model correctly.»

The research in the paper combined the latest climate predictions from the Met Office Hadley Centre, including a high resolution climate model for the UK, with two phosphorus transfer models of different complexity.

The approach proposed in the paper combines information from observation - based data, general circulation models (GCMs) and regional climate models (RCMs).

In fact, the climate science literature is replete with papers that call out the challenges of accurately accounting for clouds in models.

In my class on climate change problem solving, I use a 2005 paper by M. H. Zhang et al. that compares modeled clouds with observed ones from 10 climate models.

Many previous models also assume independence between climate models, whereas this paper accounts for commonalities shared by various models — such as physical equations or fluid dynamics — and correlates between data sets.

«This new high - resolution climate model is able to simulate regional - scale precipitation with considerably improved accuracy compared to previous generation models,» said Tom Delworth, a research scientist at NOAA's Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory in Princeton, N.J., who helped develop the new model and is co-author of the paper.

In their current PNAS paper, the multidisciplinary team of Rodó, Burns, Dan Cayan, PhD, a climate researcher at UC San Diego Scripps Institution of Oceanography and co-authors in New York, Barcelona and Japan, say the new evidence suggests that the most likely cause of KD is a «preformed toxin or environmental molecule» originating from northeastern China, possibly related to Candida, which has been linked to Kawasaki - like coronary artery vasculitis in mouse models.

Subsequently cited in 54 papers, the Science study showed that even using the lower end of 23 climate models suggested that in the tropics at the end of the century, «the hottest seasons on record will represent the future norm in many locations,» with the devastating impacts on wheat and rice yields.

Only two of the 11 models used to project future warming in the most recent report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) considered the effects of limited nitrogen on plant growth; none considered phosphorus, although one paper from 2014 subsequently pointed out this omission.

In a paper released Sunday in the journal Nature Climate Change, Smead, Sandler, and their colleagues, including Northeastern Assistant Professor John Basl, put forth a new modeling approach that examines this very problem.

A new scientific paper by a University of Maryland - led international team of distinguished scientists, including five members of the National Academies, argues that there are critical two - way feedbacks missing from current climate models that are used to inform environmental, climate, and economic policies.

But most models have focused on short - term timescales, decades or a few centuries at most, says Anders Levermann, a climate scientist at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany and co-author of the newclimate scientist at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany and co-author of the newClimate Impact Research in Germany and co-author of the new paper.

Current climate models do not take into account glacial flow and therefore underestimate the impact of glacial melt and the calving of ice flows, the researchers argue in a paper detailing the findings in today's Science.

The three papers remove a major stumbling block to a scientific consensus, says Benjamin Santer of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, lead author of the climate model study.

While praising the models» sophistication and the paper's illumination of the link between climate and nesting, Tucker says he is not convinced that baby - turtle survival is more important in determining nest counts than the number of adult females in good breeding condition.

The editor - in - chief of the journal Remote Sensing has resigned over the publication of a paper questioning the reliability of climate models.

Climate modeling and observational data suggest the world is already on track to reach dangerous levels of warming by the end of the century, according to the two papers.

It's a prediction paper, based upon models, for how many extinctions that may possibly might perhaps one day occur due to climate change.

This is the inescapable conclusion of a landmark paper, published in Nature Geoscience, which finally admits that the computer models have overstated the impact of carbon dioxide on climate and that the planet is warming more slowly than predicted.

«The storm was so strong, so intense, that the standard climate models that do not resolve fine - scale details were unable to characterize the severe precipitation or large scale meteorological pattern associated with the storm,» said Michael Wehner, a climate scientist in the lab's Computational Research Division and co-author of the paper.

In a recent paper titled, «Demarcating circulation regimes of synchronously rotating terrestrial planets within the habitable zone,» my co-authors and I analyze a set of climate model calculations to examine the dependence upon stellar effective temperature of the atmospheric dynamics of planets as they move closer to the inner edge of the habitable zone.

Indeed the estimate of aerosol forcing used in the calculation of transient climate response (TCR) in the paper does not come directly from climate models, but instead incorporates an adjustment to those models so that the forcing better matches the assessed estimates from the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change climate response (TCR) in the paper does not come directly from climate models, but instead incorporates an adjustment to those models so that the forcing better matches the assessed estimates from the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change climate models, but instead incorporates an adjustment to those models so that the forcing better matches the assessed estimates from the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Climate Change (IPCC).

A new paper takes an in - depth look at the suggestion that climate models routinely overestimate the speed at which Earth's surface is warming — and finds the argument lacking.

A recent paper by climate skeptic politician Viscount Christopher Monckton claimed scientists» model - based projections of climate change are overstated.

This paper proposes a more «all - around» lightweight ontology for CH materials in relation to CC, which greatly facilitates decision support and merges several pertinent aspects: CH Assets, Stakeholders and Roles, Climate Effects, Risk Management, conservation actions, materials, models, sensors and observations.

The paper highlights the «loud divergence between sea level reality» and «the climate models [that] predict an accelerated sea - level rise driven by the anthropogenic CO2 emission.»

The paper says that large extremes of wet and dry conditions that climate models simulate for the 20th century aren't found in the reconstruction.

The paper prompted a MailOnline headline of, «Projections of global drought and flood may be flawed», while the Australian followed suit with, «Climate model projections on rain and drought wrong, study says».

These papers and similar findings published led to a paradigm shift in the way models describe SOA formation and evaporation, including a new treatment of SOA that is currently being implemented in DOE's Accelerated Climate Model for Energy (ACME).

In this paper we develop models that measure climate forcing in long - term trends of loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) nesting in Japan and Florida.

The paper's lead author describes his findings thus — «Recent observations suggest the expected rate of warming in response to rising greenhouse gas levels, or «Transient Climate Response,» is likely to lie within the range of current climate models, but not at the high end of thisClimate Response,» is likely to lie within the range of current climate models, but not at the high end of thisclimate models, but not at the high end of this range.

What makes this modeling technique truly valuable, writes Andreas Vieli, a climate scientist at the University of Zurich, in a commentary accompanying the new paper, is that it's based on widely available data.

The team did not only look at specific events however but also published a number of conceptual papers on attribution as a science, CPDN as a unique capability and climate modelling in general (10 - 15).

In a paper published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, my co-author and I use a three - dimensional computer climate model to examine the role of geothermal heating on planets orbiting M - dwarfs.

There have been quite a number of papers published in recent years concerning «emergent constraints» on equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) in comprehensive global climate models (GCMs), of both the current (CMIP5) and previous (CMIP3) generations.

Brian Beckage and Katherine Lacasse are two of the co-authors of the new paper «Linking models of human behavior and climate alters projected climate change ``, published in the journal Nature Climate Change on January 1climate alters projected climate change ``, published in the journal Nature Climate Change on January 1climate change ``, published in the journal Nature Climate Change on January 1Climate Change on January 1, 2018.

In a new paper, Schneider et al. outline a blueprint for a next - generation climate model that would employ advancements in data assimilation and machine learning techniques to learn continuously from real - world observations and high - resolution simulations.

However, satellite observations are notably cooler in the lower troposphere than predicted by climate models, and the research team in their paper acknowledge this, remarking: «One area of concern is that on average... simulations underestimate the observed lower stratospheric cooling and overestimate tropospheric warming... These differences must be due to some combination of errors in model forcings, model response errors, residual observational inhomogeneities, and an unusual manifestation of natural internal variability in the observations.»

John Christy and Roy Spencer of the University of Alabama published a series of papers starting about 1990 that implied the troposphere was warming at a much slower rate than the surface temperature record and climate models indicated Spencer and Christy (1992).

With more than 1000bn tonnes of carbon estimated to be locked up in permafrost soils, the impacts for climate could be very significant, says Dr Sarah Chadburn, a specialist in Arctic permafrost modelling at the University of Exeter and lead author on the new paper.

It's a long paper with a long title: «Ice melt, sea level rise and superstorms: evidence from paleoclimate data, climate modeling, and modern observations that 2 oC global warming could be dangerous».

While climate models all predict permafrost thaw as high northern regions warm, they differ on how severe the impacts are likely to be, the paper explains.

By Kenneth Richard «Consensus» Science Takes A Hit In 2017 During 2017, 485 scientific papers have been published that cast doubt on the position that anthropogenic CO2 emissions function as the climate's fundamental control knob... or that otherwise question the efficacy of climate models or the related «consensus» positions commonly endorsed by policymakers and mainstream media.

I have seen a couple of papers, admittedly only in the blogosphere, which try and model the bit between climate change and weather based on AMO ENSO and CO2.

You may feel you didn't criticize the Stainforth et al paper, but you did misunderstand it in one crucial respect, in that you said explicitly that our «the most important result... is that by far most of the models had climate sensitivities between 2ºC and 4ºC, giving additional support to the widely accepted range.»