Then just last week, a panel of
climate policy experts from various Chinese government think tanks, published an extensive 900 - page report that has gained notable attention in both the Chinese and Western press for advocating the notion that China can feasibly aim to peak its carbon emissions by 2030.
Not exact matches
- how you can claim it's unfair to characterize evangelicals as anti-intellectual while following a man who believes conspiracy theories
from the National Enquirer, thinks
climate change is a hoax, says vaccines cause autism, and displays such breathtaking ignorance regarding the state of the world and foreign
policy that no former presidents will endorse him and multiple generals, foreign
policy experts, editorial boards, and heads of state have denounced him as dangerously uninformed,
«Meat — The Big Omission
from the Talks on Emissions» Humane Society, Brighter Green, Chatham House 9 Dec 15:00 — 16:30 Observer Room 04 COP21 Paris — Le Bourget Site Leading
experts and government officials will discuss the
climate impacts of meat and dairy consumption, public awareness, and potential
policy and behaviour - change solutions.
Some conservative
policy experts who support
climate action express limited optimism that the GOP candidates are slowly transitioning away
from attacking the science directly.
Of course, there are quite a few
experts in
climate science and
policy who warn that debating whether the research pointing to a disruptive human
climate influence is, or is not, settled is a complete distraction
from the reality that the basics are not in dispute (more CO2 = warming world = rising seas and lots of changing
climate patterns).
The first and most obvious point of consideration in ascertaining the utility of the statement comes
from the recognition that it refers to «
experts on
climate and energy
policy» making predictions regarding the actions of China.
In this case, the committee might have discovered more than a few papers by one of them on the subject, such as Risbey and Kandlikar (2002) «
Expert Assessment of Uncertainties in Detection and Attribution of
Climate Change» in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, or that Prof. Risbey was a faculty member in Granger Morgan's Engineering and Public Policy department at CMU for five years, a place awash in expert elicitation of climate (I sent my abstract to Prof. Morgan — who I know from my AGU uncertainty quantification days — for his opinion before submitting it to the confe
Climate Change» in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, or that Prof. Risbey was a faculty member in Granger Morgan's Engineering and Public
Policy department at CMU for five years, a place awash in
expert elicitation of
climate (I sent my abstract to Prof. Morgan — who I know from my AGU uncertainty quantification days — for his opinion before submitting it to the confe
climate (I sent my abstract to Prof. Morgan — who I know
from my AGU uncertainty quantification days — for his opinion before submitting it to the conference).
The Riyadh meetings were the 6th ministerial - level gathering of the CSLF, bringing in high - ranking energy and
climate change officials
from the CSLF member nations, as well as business and NGO
experts in CCS that contributed to
Policy, Technology, and Stakeholder working group meetings.
10/18/16 — Setting a tax on carbon emissions
from fossil fuel combustion is considered by many
experts, including two economic analysts writing in Issues, as a promising way to help control human - caused
climate change, but US
policy makers have resisted.
It includes articles
from expert practitioners,
policy makers and project staff on
climate friendly HCFC phase - out.
Based on input
from more than 100
experts in 36 countries, the report offers specific, practical strategies and innovative case studies to inform how to integrate
climate change risks into national
policies and planning.
Climate Etc. provides a forum for climate researchers, academics and technical experts from other fields, citizen scientists, and the interested public to engage in a discussion on topics related to climate science and the science - policy int
Climate Etc. provides a forum for
climate researchers, academics and technical experts from other fields, citizen scientists, and the interested public to engage in a discussion on topics related to climate science and the science - policy int
climate researchers, academics and technical
experts from other fields, citizen scientists, and the interested public to engage in a discussion on topics related to
climate science and the science - policy int
climate science and the science -
policy interface.
This approach involves using research,
expert analysis and industry partnerships to broaden the menu of effective
policy options and low carbon energy technologies that society has to choose
from in combating
climate change.
The Himalayan Times:
Climate experts from six different countries, including Nepal, have called for integration of climate and disaster risks management into national development policies and prog
Climate experts from six different countries, including Nepal, have called for integration of
climate and disaster risks management into national development policies and prog
climate and disaster risks management into national development
policies and programmes.
A group of 40 auditors — including scientists and public
policy experts from across the globe — have released a shocking report card on the U.N.'s landmark
climate - change research report.
Read an introduction to the series by Alexis Madrigal and follow the responses
from our panel of
climate -
policy experts.
Drawing on case studies of past environmental debates such as those over acid rain and ozone depletion, science
policy experts Roger Pielke Jr. and Daniel Sarewitz argue that once next generation technologies are available that make meaningful action on
climate change lower - cost, then much of the argument politically over scientific uncertainty is likely to diminish.26 Similarly, research by Yale University's Dan Kahan and colleagues suggest that building political consensus on
climate change will depend heavily on advocates for action calling attention to a diverse mix of options, with some actions such as tax incentives for nuclear energy, government support for clean energy research, or actions to protect cities and communities against
climate risks, more likely to gain support
from both Democrats and Republicans.
In 1997 Global Possibilities and UC Santa Barbara co-hosted the US Solar and Renewable Energy
Policy Symposium entitled «The Back Burner Status of Solar» attended by leading
experts from government, utilities, business and environmental organizations examining renewable energy markets, the current business
climate, including transportation, land use planning and technology development.
NIPCC scientists and
experts from Washington, DC - based think tanks will be in Washington the week of April 7 to publicly release the final two volumes of the
Climate Change Reconsidered II series: Biological Impacts, which is available online at www.climatechangereconsidered.org, and Human Welfare, Energy, and
Policies, which will become available online during the coming week.
These points are most powerfully driven home by Harvard economist Martin Weitzman (a good summary of his work on this topic and its
policy implications can be found in pages 20 - 25 the The Costs of Delaying Action to Stem
Climate Change
from the White House Council of Economic Advisors) and financial risk management
expert Bob Litterman.
As you might expect
from a broad mix of physical scientists, economists, social scientists and
policy experts, the nominations spanned a range of topics and historical periods, capturing some of the great
climate pioneers and the very latest
climate economics research.
The
experts from the African Ministerial Council on Water (AMCOW), Global Water Partnership and CARICOM also called for water managers to build on their local innovations for
climate resilience — and to get savvier about communicating solutions to
policy - makers.
The town - hall meeting saw interventions
from experts in international relations, anthropology, geography, ethics, engineering, humanitarian aid,
climate modelling and environmental
policy.
A new analysis
from the Breakthrough Institute shows how the growing
expert consensus that energy efficiency rebound is real and significant substantially undercuts RMI's projected gains
from efficiency measures and makes their proposals of limited relevance as far as
climate policy is concerned.
Written by thousands of science,
policy, and economics
experts from around the world, the UN International Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) reports represent a synthesis of existing climate research knowledge, focusing on the evidence of a warming climate («virtually certain»), the global impacts, and the ways we might avert its most catastrophic e
Climate Change (IPCC) reports represent a synthesis of existing
climate research knowledge, focusing on the evidence of a warming climate («virtually certain»), the global impacts, and the ways we might avert its most catastrophic e
climate research knowledge, focusing on the evidence of a warming
climate («virtually certain»), the global impacts, and the ways we might avert its most catastrophic e
climate («virtually certain»), the global impacts, and the ways we might avert its most catastrophic effects.
Although the world's attention continued to focus on the IPCC's Working Group I, which addressed the physical science, increasing funding and attention went to the other two Working Groups, which addressed the likely impacts of
climate change and the
policies needed to mitigate the damage, recruiting
experts in fields ranging
from epidemiology to economics.
EPA's Clean Power Plan is receiving considerable attention
from experts within the RFF Center for
Climate and Electricity
Policy.
The new study, however, was aimed at marshalling the expertise of 17 other
climate and
policy experts from the UK, Australia, France, Sweden and Switzerland as well as the US, to outline the dangerous consequences of sticking to the 2C warming target endorsed by the United Nations and world leaders.
Climate expert Fahad Saeed, who heads the
Climate Change Unit at the Islamabad - based think tank Sustainable Development
Policy Institute (SDPI), said it could be a good time for Pakistan to invest in clean energy by tapping intelligently into the international funding available and demanding technology transfer or investment
from the USD 100 billion figure per year earmarked for the Green
Climate Fund by 2020.
Reno, NV About Blog
Climate Etc. provides a forum for climate researchers, academics and technical experts from other fields, citizen scientists, and the interested public to engage in a discussion on topics related to climate science and the science - policy int
Climate Etc. provides a forum for
climate researchers, academics and technical experts from other fields, citizen scientists, and the interested public to engage in a discussion on topics related to climate science and the science - policy int
climate researchers, academics and technical
experts from other fields, citizen scientists, and the interested public to engage in a discussion on topics related to
climate science and the science - policy int
climate science and the science -
policy interface.