The project thus provides important insights for policymakers about the acceptance of SRM and its influence on
the climate policy portfolio.
Reasonable people can disagree and, ultimately, can come down on different sides of the question of whether solar geoengineering could — or should — play a role in an overall
climate policy portfolio.
Not exact matches
There is probably no other
policy portfolio which has as many question - marks hanging over it as does the energy and
climate change brief.
FIGURE 3: State - Based
Climate and Renewable Energy
Policies in the United States Twenty - five states and the District of Columbia have independently enacted a Renewable
Portfolio Standard (RPS), which require that a certain portion of the state's energy consumption come from renewable energy.
However, to date, countries have not incorporated coastal blue carbon into their
portfolio of
climate change mitigation or coastal management
policies and actions, largely because the mechanisms for assessing blue carbon were not well defined or standardized.
States and regions have often taken the lead in developing
climate policy, from renewable
portfolio standards to cap - and - trade programs, particularly in North America.
In the financial industry, investment
portfolios are exposed to risk from increasingly stringent
climate policies.
As the public learns more about
climate engineering technologies, they will look to ENGOs to understand what the
policy issues are, and understand how these ideas fit in, it at all, with a
climate change response
portfolio.
This document argues that access to and development and use of a wide
portfolio of genetic resources is an essential insurance
policy that enables responses to future changes in production conditions due to the impact of
climate change.
This
policy document offers recommendations to the UNFCCC on how Carbon Capture Use and Storage, including carbon capture and storage for enhanced recovery of hydrocarbons, can positively contribute to net
climate change mitigation outcomes as part of the
policy portfolio established to support the post-2015 instrument.
Recommended
policies and strategies include: (1) establishment of clear energy and
climate change adaptation / mitigation
policies in Africa; (2) implementation of renewable energy development - inducing
policies; (3) creating conducive environments for private - public partnerships in clean energy development; (4) enhancement of broader regional and continental collaboration in energy and
climate change
policies; (5) accessing existing international funding sources for promoting less carbon - intensive energy technologies; and (6) implementation of energy
portfolio diversification.
This is an initiative that seeks to encourage systemic change in national adaptation - related
policy through evidence based results from a
portfolio of community - driven
climate change risk management projects.
In combination with new approaches to grassroots advocacy and election campaigns, a complementary paradigm for
climate advocacy is needed to shift our focus toward a broader
portfolio of smaller scale
policy actions and to the promotion of a more diverse array of technological options.
As outlined over the past decade in articles at Science and Nature, and in reports such as the Hartwell paper and
Climate Pragmatism, various experts have argued that political success will only come by pursuing a diverse
portfolio of
policy solutions and technologies, implemented across levels of government and through the private and nonprofit sectors.
Prior to joining IISD, he spent three years (2006 — 2008) with the Official Opposition Caucus in the Manitoba Legislature as a substantive
policy researcher specializing in the
portfolios of Science, Technology, Energy and Mines (including
climate change) and Manitoba Hydro.
All that can be told — and certainly should be told — is that
climate change brings new and changed risks, that these risks can have a range of significant implications under different conditions, that there is an array of political considerations to be taken into account when judging what needs to be done, and there are a
portfolio of powerful, but somewhat untested,
policy measures that could be tried.
In a study released just hours before President Obama's speech, the American Council on Renewable Energy (ACORE), CalCEF and the
Climate Policy Initiative highlighted the interplay between state and federal policy, but also showcased how moves by states — including aggressive renewable portfolio standards (RPS) and green banks — are pushing renewable investment fo
Policy Initiative highlighted the interplay between state and federal
policy, but also showcased how moves by states — including aggressive renewable portfolio standards (RPS) and green banks — are pushing renewable investment fo
policy, but also showcased how moves by states — including aggressive renewable
portfolio standards (RPS) and green banks — are pushing renewable investment forward.
Despite established theory and proven practice regarding public participation and engagement, citizen consultation, and related fields, their application to
climate change management, and in particular to assessing geoengineering as part of the
portfolio of
policy options, remains nascent.
This guidance document shows an initial
portfolio of adaptation case studies to establish specific
policies of adaptation to
climate change with respect to impacts on water resources.
«Effective
climate policy aimed at reducing the risks of
climate change to natural and human systems involves a
portfolio of diverse adaptation and mitigation actions (very high confidence).»
Its evolution over coming years will determine whether it becomes an effective part of China's
portfolio of
climate policies.
A greater appreciation for this body of research would allow for consideration of a broader base of
policy options to respond to the challenges of
climate change, as well as the composition of
climate research
portfolios more likely to contribute useful knowledge to decision makers.