Not exact matches
Investors who take the time and effort to research the current political
climate worldwide and ensure that they are up to date with any developments in the world of business and industry can achieve great success by making the most accurate
predictions about the way the money
market is likely to fluctuate.
In «The
Predictions Market» menu on the left the second category is «
Climate and weather».
I can try to convince you that
prediction markets are indeed superior to expert elicitation in their ability to forecast
climate change.
I had attempted a similar project at the 3rd conference with my poster «Comparison of
Climate Forecasts: Expert Opinions vs.
Prediction Markets» in which my abstract proposed the following: «As an experiment, we will ask participants to go on the record with estimates of probability that the global temperature anomaly for calendar year 2012 will be equal to or greater than x, where x ranges in increments of 0.05 °C from 0.30 to 1.10 °C (relative to the 1951 - 1980 base period, and published by NASA GISS).»
If we really want to know who's cherry picking data — land - based measurements vs geological time scales vs models, the answer is to create a betting
market for
climate prediction and get the people who think they know put their money where their mouths are.
Life moved on, and around mid 1996, I joined (or rather rejoined, since an older version had been discontinued) an interesting
market experiment, the Foresight Exchange which traded (via a reputation - based currency) in future possibilities including some
climate change - related
predictions like sea level rise.