If I had to put a probability on it, I'd say the «
climate scare mongers» (probably such as yourself) are essentially right with probability ~ 70 %.
The climate scare mongers are not going to give up even if they have to play dirty and we don't want to hear that global warming is killing us when we're in a deep freeze.
Not exact matches
Are the world's ice caps melting because of
climate change, or are the reports just a lot of
scare mongering by the advocates of the global warming theory?
CPI does not attack pro-Obama
climate change lobbyists for exaggeration or
scare mongering but instead give praise and approval to alarmist pressure groups such as Bill McKibben's 350.org and the Natural Resources Defense Council.
i think that's inaccurate shx, the scientists did their work, and from what i could gather tried very hard not to overstate their case, the media did the
scare -
mongering and the media have then turned like the whores they are in the other direction, al gore's film upped the tempo and although it seemed like a good thing at the time, i think with hindsight it was a poisoned chalice, but lets be clear, doing research in multiple areas and having the results point to potentially catastrophic
climate change and asking for changes to be made to avert this is not
scare -
mongering, its common sense, accepting that their is margin for error but erring on the side of caution since the stakes are life on earth as we know it is not
scare -
mongering, it is the application of the precautionary principle and common sense
You know, the good old
scare mongering stuff we've heard from green lobby groups, etc.: increased vector borne diseases, migrations of unpleasant animals as well as millions of «
climate refugees» escaping torrid temperatures, etc. etc..
Peden wrote, «' Real
Climate» is a staged and contracted production, which wasn't created by «scientists,» it was actually created by Environmental Media Services, a company which specializes in spreading environmental junk science on behalf of numerous clients who stand to financially benefit from
scare tactics through environmental fear
mongering.»
Again, the possible consequences of
climate change are the subject of much to - ing and fro - ing with accusations of irresponsible
scare -
mongering and reprehensible complacency flying between the parties.
In essence, these celebrity «experts» essentially repeat simple
scare -
mongering of global warming and
climate change without the merits of any known empirical evidence research.
There are two aspects of the recent presentation Great Lakes Vineyard Confronts
Climate Change that need to be considered:
scare mongering by anecdote and Bandolini's BS principle.