Sentences with phrase «climate sceptical scientists»

«I am not interviewing a lot of the main climate sceptical scientists because I feel like they have been interviewed by many other people and their stories have been told.

Happer and his fellow climate sceptical scientists are the Western world's equivalent of the dissident scientists hounded by the Communist authorities in the Soviet era.

Not exact matches

Others have become more sceptical after reading the work of scientists who refuse to accept the broad consensus in their community about climate change.

In a congressional meeting room, somewhere on Capitol Hill, one of the world's leading sceptical climate scientists, Dr. Tim Ball, is toasting the advent of the Trump administration.

They then made the observation that sceptical climate scientists got fewer papers into the journals, and were cited less.

I'm not a scientist (neither are many of the PSI founding members) but after giving careful consideration to the arguments since March 2007 I am sceptical of the Catatrophic Anthropogenic Climate Change (CACC) hypothesis.

However, many other scientists are sceptical that CO2 - fertilisation could be strong enough to account for around 2 billion tonnes of carbon per year.Feedbacks involving different components of the carbon cycle - and climate change itself - will affect how CO2 levels respond to man - made emissions.

I liked Titley quite a lot but couldn't understand why he seemed to be the «go to» guy as I didn't think he had as much technical knowledge of climate as the three sceptical scientists on the panel.

For me, that begins with people accepting that there is no hiding place left in the science — the overwhelming consensus of the vast body of scientists that study climate is that the trends we are seeing in the air, the oceans and in our ecosystems are entirely consistent with the theory of global warming, while the alternatives offered by sceptical scientists — even the much heralded role of the Sun — so far fail that test.

We're not saying (or thinking) that climate scientists (sceptical or not) are stupid, and we're not trying to «trick» or «set up» anyone.

See: The Australian: Climate Depot's «report contained 1000 names of eminent scientists who are sceptical» of man - made global warming claims.

If it were true, it would mean that 1 in 100,000 climate scientists were sceptical, and we can think of enough sceptics to put the number of climate scientists in the world well into the tens of millions.

We found it difficult to understand why the BBC had not sought out and conducted lengthy interviews with some of the very many reputable scientists who are sceptical about the impact of CO2 and mankind on the global climate.

Moreover, by applying the term «denial» (with all its loaded undertones) to sceptical scientists; by referring to them inaccurately as «well funded» by the oil industry; and by likening those who stress the uncertainties of climate science to unprincipled lobbyists for tobacco companies, Lord May enters on the field of personal vilification — not a suitable place for a distinguished former President of the Royal Society.

Instead, Bean has Cassell's boss Kevin, also a climate scientist, confess that «we are all sceptical of the hockey stick».

When I saw the title «The Inquisition of Climate Science», I immediately thought of the defamation of scientists sceptical of IPCC science and policy, blocking of FOI requests, the corruption of peer review, etc..

In the words of a climate scientists that I am a little aquainted with... who was trying to get across this simple mesage to the resident sceptical commenators at Bishop Hill: http://www.bishop-hill.net/blog/2011/9/28/dellers-on-reason.html?currentPage=3#comments

Open minded in the beginning but increasingly sceptical as the deficiencies of the scientific method as applied by climate scientists unfolded.

Sceptical scientists and climate realists, contest natural variation; solar magnetic effects, volcanic eruptions, solar irradiance, ozone depletion, ocean currents PDO / AMO, clouds, all play a much more significant role in the climate system.

Andrew Montford's observation comes in response to an article by Gavin Schmidt, in which he apparently shows more reflection on the problems of science and advocacy than I would have expected, given his robust statements about «deniers», and his refusal to debate with more sceptical climate scientists in the past, and his impatience with his scientific critics, to the delight of climate activists.

Climate scientist Steven Sherwood of the University of New South Wales, who proposed the 35 °C survivability limit, said he was sceptical that this threshold could be reached as soon as the researchers say.

For a much more detailed discussion of a sceptical scientist's view of the validity of using model output as the basis for policing making in climate science, take a look at Dr Roy Spencer's explanation of how these models work and why he thinks they are flawed:

Hence the recent Harrabin Q&A session giving prominence to past temperature change and and the Guardian series on the CRU hack leading with a profile of Steve McIntyre and going on to discuss the supposed suppression of sceptical science by climate scientists.

Maybe now you will have a better sense of just how frustrated many sceptical, legitimate climate scientists have felt for the last couple of decades.

But it is curious that the No Scientist chose the headline Sceptical climate scientists concede Earth has warmed, and then goes on to quote a number of sceptics, each of whom seem to have told the article's author, Michael Marshall that the warming was never in question.