Sentences with phrase «climate science talking»

The US «special report» focuses on climate science talking points — surface temperature (instruments at 2m from the ground and ocean surface temperature), hydrology, climate sensitivity, sea level rise, acidification, etc..

We are not afraid to take / steal a little credit where it's not easily given to — let's face it — an obscure and just really rather small website (but still we hope one of your favourite bookmark pages for random climate science talk), Bitsofscience.org.

Not exact matches

I remember watching his science videos in elementary school but now whenever I see him on the news talking about science it seems like he is politicizing science (when it comes to climate change) and promoting evolution as the only option to the creation of the world to try and discredit the religious community.

As someone working somewhere in the midst of that nexus of «science, values, ethics and politics» you describe (economics, international relations, technology... the climate policy list goes on), I do recognise what you're talking about, but I really don't see that we should very much care.

The EPA last night sent employees a list of eight approved talking points on climate change from its Office of Public Affairs — guidelines that promote a message of uncertainty about climate science and gloss over proposed cuts to key adaptation programs.

Trump's likely pick to fill the role of a top scientist at the USDA — Sam Clovis, best known for hosting a conservative talk show in Iowa — is a climate change skeptic with no background in science.

«The chairman of the committee on Science Space and Technology is making what to us is a pretty ludicrous assertion, that rather than trying to protect the rights of citizens to ensure that business fraud, and could be very significant business fraud we could talk about inflating up assets by many billions of dollars, their claim is that this is a politically charged effort to silence descending views on climate,» Schneiderman said on a recent visit to Syracuse.

Scientific American executive editor Fred Guterl talks with Pres. Obama's science advisor, John Holdren, about climate science, space travel, the issue of reproducibility in science, the brain initiative and more.

Scientific American staffers Mark Fischetti and Robin Lloyd talk with podcast host Steve Mirsky about sessions they attended — including those about algae for energy, dissecting the astronomy in art, and attitudes about climate change — at the recent meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Catherine Matacic — online news editor for Science — talks with Sarah Crespi about how geoengineering could reduce the harshest impacts of climate change, but make them even worse if it were ever turned off.

James McCarthy, Alexander Agassiz professor of biological oceanography at Harvard, talks about climate science and testifying before Congress, and the collaborations between climate scientists and the national security community as well as with evangelicals.

In 2009 he said, when talking about climate change, that the «science is highly contentious, to say the least» and «the climate change argument is absolute crap», but did accept that precautionary action against it was a good idea.

In his 2013 State of the Union address, Pres. Obama talked about climate change, energy and manufacturing technology innovation, and STEM education — that is, science, technology, engineering and math

We talked with the unexpectedly modest and soft - spoken Henrik Svensmark about his work, the criticism it has received, and truth versus hype in climate science.

«Scientists have talked about Arctic melting and albedo decrease for nearly 50 years,» said Ramanathan, a distinguished professor of climate and atmospheric sciences at Scripps who has previously conducted similar research on the global dimming effects of aerosols.

And it was great because there were three journalists on the panel who talked about what they were doing these days and covering climate science, including Elizabeth Shogren from NPR.

So he sexes up his narrative by presenting it as a battle between the «short, professorial looking» Emanuel, a «nuanced and sophisticated» man who talks in complete sentences, and the obdurate William Gray of Colorado State University, «a towering figure of American hurricane science,» who has for many years produced remarkably accurate forecasts of the upcoming Atlantic hurricane season and who repeatedly and loudly denies — in congressional hearings and everywhere else — that humans have any role in climate change.

On Wednesday, Dec. 17, at the American Geophysical Union's Fall Meeting in San Francisco, Noah Diffenbaugh, an associate professor of environmental Earth system science at the Stanford School of Earth Sciences, will discuss approaches to this challenge in a talk titled «Quantifying the Influence of Observed Global Warming on the Probability of Unprecedented Extreme Climate Events.»

Solutions: Smart talking and media mastery Surveys show that most people want more information about climate science, Schmidt said, so scientists should engage in public forums such as blogs, question - and - answer sessions and public talks, provided they are not simply stacked with angry debaters.

The commentary, «Facing the diversity crisis on climate science,» was born when Schuldt and co-author Adam Pearson, an assistant professor of psychology at Pomona College, began talking about University of Michigan Professor Dorceta Taylor report, «The State of Diversity in Environmental Organizations.»

Other officials expected to take part in the talks include Xie Zhenhua, head of China's Climate Change and Coordinating Committee, U.S. State Department climate change envoy Todd Stern, Energy Secretary Steven Chu and White House science adviser John Holdren (ClimateWire, JuClimate Change and Coordinating Committee, U.S. State Department climate change envoy Todd Stern, Energy Secretary Steven Chu and White House science adviser John Holdren (ClimateWire, Juclimate change envoy Todd Stern, Energy Secretary Steven Chu and White House science adviser John Holdren (ClimateWire, July 27).

Richard, who recently delivered a TEDx talk on «Medical Metaphors for Climate Issues», used that talk as an example of how the NCA could be utilized as a resource for science communication.

And Perdue's not the only leading recipient of Southern's political support to help spread the questionable scientific talking points the utility has paid for: Rep. Gary Palmer, an Alabama Republican who received $ 18,000 from the company's PAC and employees in the 2014 cycle, last year told WATE that science «says global climate change is more a function of nature and solar activity than it is anything man does.»

It would measure progress by counting, among other things, the percentage of news articles that raise questions about climate science and the number of radio talk show appearances by scientists questioning the prevailing views.

Paul Beckwith, PhD candidate in Climate Science at University of Ottawa, talked about the wide range impact of climate change, December 2012.Climate Science at University of Ottawa, talked about the wide range impact of climate change, December 2012.climate change, December 2012.»

We talk through some of the most pressing issues in modern climate science: our chances of staying below 1.5 °C of warming without climate engineering, climate engineering with land - based albedo modifications, and the kinds of societal transformations needed for radical mitigation.

During the 2012 Fall Meeting on the American Geophysical Union (AGU), Director Susan Hassol and Science Director Richard Somerville joined award - winning photographer James Balog in presenting a talk on communicating climate change.

As climate negotiators near the midway point of the talks in Paris, Bernadette Woods Placky looks ahead to the role that science might play in reducing global warming.

A few days later, [MIT climate scientist Kerry] Emanuel got a call from [House Science Committee Chair Lamar] Smith, who wanted to talk about the book.

Talk to us about artificial intelligence, Big Science, climate change, gender and racial inequalities in science cScience, climate change, gender and racial inequalities in science cscience careers.

There was an excellent talk by Emily Levine, Interpretive Supervisor at Muir Woods, about the health of redwoods and how the science and study of these beautiful trees is helping us learn about the effects of climate change and what it means for our collective future.

The Pullough Heritage Community group will be hosting Bog Cultures, a selection of talks on 11 November, celebrating climate science, conservation, and contemporary art in the bog.

Updated In recent years, Bill Nye, best known as «The Science Guy,» has become a must - book figure when a talk show, or President Obama for that matter, is looking for someone to challenge climate change denial.

How Do Big Oil Companies Talk about Climate Science?

As the respondent to a panel on climate and the press at this year's annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Boston (I was on the panel), he urged the media, and scientists who talk to the press, to substitute «global climate disruption» for that all - too - comfortable pair of words.

In light of the hard - won scientific consensus developed by the IPCC, has the time not yet come to «center» our discussion on what we know of climate change, based upon good science, and talk about what we are going to do in order to address the human - driven predicament in which humanity finds itself in these early years of Century XXI?

I'm struggling with your first paragraph where you talk of Montford claiming «all of modern climate science, is a fraud perpetrated by a massive conspiracy of climate scientists and politicians, in order to guarantee an unending supply of research funding and political power.

But this is why J Cook is important, because he promotes awareness of how deceitful climate denialists are, rather than just talking only about the science flaws in what they say.

Ahead of the Paris climate treaty talks, he helped line up parallel multi-billion-dollar pledges by government leaders and some of the world's wealthiest investors to accelerate clean - energy science and innovation.

I am not specifically talking about climate / weather, just science.»

Climate communication inevitably has an element of handling doubt or aggression — Unless one assumes that science communication is one - way, scientist to an «audience» that doesn't talk back.

Don't feed the trolls, ignore the theatrics, let's talk about climate science.

Some of the climate experts I've talked to over the years predicted that more clarity on the science actually could widen the range of policy views.

A few days later, [MIT climate scientist Kerry] Emanuel got a call from [House Science Committee Chair Lamar] Smith, who wanted to talk about the book.

Even when you talk to somebody like Steven Chu, my energy secretary, who knows the science of climate change and takes it very seriously, as do I, he's the first one to acknowledge that we're going to need some transformative technologies in order for us to get all the way to where we need to be on climate change.

I still think climate science is uniquely difficult because it has to incorporate both theory and reality in an incredibly complex and critical discipline, but «reductionism» was the wrong tag and certainly I didn't know nearly enough about what I was talking about!

I have a story in Science Times looking at the latest round of climate - treaty talks, one month ago in Bali, from the vantage point of Kevin Conrad, the young man who represented Papua New Guinea and shook things up with a strong rebuke of the United States in the final tumultuous session.

I guess in the end, extreme weather and climate will do all the talking while correct science the only worth while explaining.

I say that you are misinformed because you blindly parrot denialist talking points like «Climate science is a young science,» and «The science is uncertain.»

I don't believe he was referring to «authority» in the sense of expertise; in some sense the role of the IPCC in fixing belief around climate science is similar to Peirce's «authority», but it has no enforcement power and to me it seems far more like a step in the process of fixation and communication of scientific information, part of the publishing process, than anything like what Peirce was talking about in method 2.