The fault was first detected after a tip off from an anonymous member of the public to
climate skeptic blog, Climate Change Fraud (view original article)(August 9, 2010).
NOAA's Program Coordinator, Chuck Pistis has now confirmed that the fast spreading story on the respected
climate skeptic blog is true.»
-LSB-...]
climate skeptic blog Climate Audit posted a link to the hacked files with a note reading: «A miracle just happened.»
* In a blog post for Climate Audit, a prominent
climate skeptic blog, he used Stevens» study to suggest that as CO2 levels double in the atmosphere, global temperatures would rise by only 1.2 to 1.8 degrees Celsius.
Joe Romm gives his take on
the climate skeptic blog «Watts Up With That?»
i believe that what you are doing with
your climate skeptic blog is dangerous.
Gosselin is the author of
the climate skeptic blog NoTrickZone.com.
I had (somewhat naively; o) hoped a peer - reviewed paper explaining some of these basic issues would go some way to preventing the promulgation of these arguments on
climate skeptic blogs, but of course it didn't.
Scientists do have better things to do with their time than answer questions raised on
climate skeptic blogs, and as a result, you will only generally be assured of a climate change paper taking a stance on the cause of the change if the subject of the paper is an attribution study.
He reads
the climate skeptics blogs huh?
Headlines like «2014: The Most Dishonest Year on Record» have been posted on
climate skeptic blogs, such as Watts Up With That, and a commentator for the popular British newspaper The Daily Mail all but accused NASA of lying to the press and the public about global temperatures, despite the open discussion of uncertainties both in NASA's press materials and during a press conference with audio that is publicly accessible.
I run Scandinavia's largest
climate skeptics blog and I find myself agreeing with you on every point.
Not exact matches
While being publicized in the mainstream media certainly makes researchers a target, being picked up in the
skeptic blogosphere, which includes widely read
blogs such asWatts Up With That,
Climate Audit and Morano's
Climate Depot, can also lead to scientists receiving email barrages, even when, as in Norgaard's case, the research has not received mainstream media attention.
According to Ross McKitrick, an economist at the University of Guelph in Ontario, who was among those sending FOI demands to East Anglia on behalf of
Climate Audit, a
skeptics blog.
But one of the difficulties I found in examining the views of
climate skeptics is that they are scattered widely in
blogs, talks, and pamphlets.
Richard Betts, the head of the
climate impacts section of Britain's Met Office, recently left a comment on the «
skeptic» *
blog Bishop Hill stating that thresholds for
climate danger, such as the much ballyhooed 2 - degree limit enshrined in recent
climate pledges, were not determined by science:
The «World
Climate Widget» from Tony Watts» blog is probably the most popular deceptive image among climate «skeptics&
Climate Widget» from Tony Watts»
blog is probably the most popular deceptive image among
climate «skeptics&
climate «
skeptics».
Tom Fuller says «I find it truly bizarre that you (or one of the
skeptic blogs) has not yet realized that weblogs are the absolutely perfect mechanism for conducting a proper debate on an issue like
climate change
Blogs of those variously called
climate realists /
skeptics / deniers are hammering on the chilly conditions, presumably in hopes of fending off a new push to close out the
climate bill in the Senate.
One of the stranger memes to come from the recent influx of
climate skeptic / denialist commenters on this
blog has been the idea that the developing world can't afford robust action to cut emissions.
The weakness in looking at short time scales was revealed nicely in a simple and revealing animated graph, created for the Skeptical Science
blog, showing how self - described
climate skeptics were «going down the up escalator.»
All three positions are represented among the
climate - change
skeptics who infest talk shows, Internet
blogs, letters to the editor, op - ed pieces, and cocktail - party conversations.
Climate change is one of the primary topics on the
blog and, although Eric himself is very balanced in his approach, there are a lot of
skeptics posting there.
Too bad these
climate blogs (both
skeptics and believers) focus on ad hominem attacks like this.
In my previous
blog post, I showed how one anonymous op - ed writer tried to casually drop the «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» phrase into his piece to insinuate
skeptic climate scientists received illicit industry money in exchange for the promise to lie to the public.
The list of
skeptics on the EPW
blog contains few bona fide
climate specialists.
«Since they've descended on this
blog to troll, I've found that many of the
climate change
skeptics here still think that tobacco has no link with cancer»
«Since they've descended on this
blog to troll, I've found that many of the
climate change
skeptics here still think that tobacco has no link with cancer, still think that acid rain and the ozone hole don't exist, and still think that the DDT ban was just «The Man» trying to exert power over the little guy.
At the end of my August 7th
blog piece, I mentioned how any prominent person insinuating that industry money corrupts
skeptic climate scientists seems to be separated from Ross Gelbspan by three degrees or less.
Skeptic — I at least glance through several climate related blogs, mostly skeptic or luke warmer
Skeptic — I at least glance through several
climate related
blogs, mostly
skeptic or luke warmer
skeptic or luke warmer sites.
Even though this series of
blog posts concerns a prominent complaint filed in 2007 against the UK Channel Four Television Corporation video «The Great Global Warming Swindle,» my objective is to show how a thorough analysis of any given accusation about
skeptic climate scientists being «paid industry money to lie» shatters the accusation to bits no matter where the hammer strikes.
As the
blogs of
skeptics and deniers were lighting up over the e-mails — «catnip to these guys,» as comedian Jon Stewart put it — Trenberth depicted the leak as a political move to influence discussions on
climate change at the Copenhagen talks.
I've read the
climate sensitivity papers written by Stephen Schwartz, who is taken to be a
skeptic by many who comment on this
blog.
This is actually pretty common in all of the blogosphere, and moreso in those science
blogs which aren't focused (nor do they care too much) on
climate science, but whenever some controversy hits the cables they have to put their uninformed hands into it, preferably to state for the nth time why the
skeptics and deniers are such fools and shills for the oils and the rethuglicans.
The
climate change
skeptic blog Watts Up With That also publicized the story.
Reporters need to actively ferret out these problems on a weekly basis rather than waiting until
climate skeptics and
blogs discover them and blow their significance out of proportion.
The hacker proceeded to comment on other, lesser - known
climate change skeptic blogs including the Air Vent (run by Patrick Condon), as well as on a blog titled Climate S
climate change
skeptic blogs including the Air Vent (run by Patrick Condon), as well as on a blog titled Climate S
skeptic blogs including the Air Vent (run by Patrick Condon), as well as on a
blog titled
Climate S
Climate SkepticSkeptic.
So when you then add «I came to this
blog seriously hoping that there was an honest
climate skeptic,» I would suggest that you came here with the intent to look for any evidence, no matter how semantic, pointless or ridiculous, to reinforce your view that all sceptics are «dishonest.»
I came to this
blog seriously hoping that there was an honest
climate skeptic.
-LSB-...] warming pause, the epic failure of
climate models, and the growing popularity of
skeptic blogs, Hockey Stick inventor Michael Mann still tries to pull rank and tell policymakers what to do because, after -LSB-...]
Watts is the editor and primary contributor to the
blog, while other authors have included
climate change
skeptics such as Roger Pielke Senior and Pielke Jr..
Watts edits the
blog Watts Up With That, which questions
climate science and presents, «the untold story of the
climate debate from the
climate skeptic side.»
Re left / right if you read enough of Revkin's dot earth
blog it becomes clear that many, if not most, of the posters seem to think that
climate skeptics are informed by right wing politics.
Based on the number of comments that day and the average readership of the
skeptic blogs, they had an army poring over the files in a race to find the next «juicy» comment from the
climate scientists.
NY Times Disregards Times Staffers» Advice On Avoiding Term «
Climate Change
Skeptic»
Blog Media Matters for America.
On other
blogs, one way to identify the
climate skeptics is that they're the ones who talk in that dismissively pseudoscientific way.
Now going over the
Climate AGW
skeptics»
blogs (I do it once a week, reading Watts Up With That daily) I came across with your remark — «not evil, just silly».
Well, Judith is running a
skeptic blog here so I shouldn't complain: standard practice for
climate skeptics would appear to bear little resemblance to standard practice for
climate scientists.
So I am a
skeptic about many long - term
climate models, and these 20 are just the models that get posted to this
blog, and I am not counting the scads of alternative models (Salby, etc) that get posted elsewhere.
Today I offer this post as a «Summary for Policymakers» regarding my series of seven prior
blog posts about a smear effort which took place back in 2007 that is a case study for examining other prior and current industry corruption accusations against
skeptic climate scientists.