Sentences with phrase «climate skeptic community»

The vibrant, international climate skeptic community owes its existence to the Internet.

He was never directly contacted or targeted by the anonymous hacker as a source to leak the emails since he was not prominent in the climate skeptic community and it required no special «expertise» to read emails, nor special «influence» to contact people like Steve McIntyre.

It is no exaggeration to say that the vibrant, international climate skeptic community owes its very existence to the Internet.

Mashable reached out to Gavin Schmidt, the director of NASA's Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS), who helped make Friday's announcement and has been a target of the vigorous pushback from the climate skeptic community.

Not exact matches

The same plague of us - or - them absolutism that has infested the small community of self - described «climate skeptics,» wrecking any chance they could have played a positive role in critiquing mainstream climatology, now threatens to overwhelm the much larger «safe food» movement, too.

Attracted to fringe scientists like the small and vocal group of climate skeptics, Republicans appear to be alienated from a mainstream scientific community that by and large doesn't share their political beliefs.

I've had arguments with many a climate skeptic, with and without scientific backgrounds alike (arguing with those from the Engineering community can be especially difficult)

The same requirement applies to the community of climate skeptics / contrarians / deniers / realists (depending on who's doing the labeling) who have made a mantra out of the «global cooling» since the 1998 peak in global temperature.

But the skeptic community seems determined to rely on this rather than describe, in an intellectually honest way, what this means for the hypothesized influence of anthropogenic CO2 on climate.

I encourage you to read «In Kansas, Climate Skeptics Embrace Cleaner Energy,» Leslie Kaufman's excellent story on enthusiastic energy - saving initiatives in a community largely resistant to the «climate crisis.Climate Skeptics Embrace Cleaner Energy,» Leslie Kaufman's excellent story on enthusiastic energy - saving initiatives in a community largely resistant to the «climate crisis.climate crisis.»

Wasn't the I.P.C.C. Assessment Report intended to be a scientific document that would merit solid backing from the climate science community — instead of forcing many climate scientists into having to agree with greenhouse skeptic criticisms that this is indeed a report with a clear and obvious political agenda.

Exaggeration only provides fodder to the dwindling community of climate skeptics and leads the audience to doubt the seriousness of climate change and the immediacy of the need for action.

Mann and the scientific community (including some climate skeptics) viewed the investigation as a grave threat to scientific inquiry, and he is relieved to put it behind him.

What every skeptic I am aware of, when allowed to speak in complete sentences and paragraphs says is that the climate is not doing much, that climate has always changed, and that it is not changing in the dangerous ways predicted by the AGW community.

And that reality has been demonstrated over and over again, most recently in the work of the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature project, led by Dr. Richard Muller, who began his comprehensive assessment as an avowed climate skeptic and ended it convinced by the clear evidence that global warming is happening and is caused by human activity.This conclusion is emphatically shared by the best and brightest of the global scientific community, including our own National Academy of Sciences.

The climate science community is going to very gradually reveal precisely what the skeptics have been saying for 20 years.

Joshua: «And in addition, think about all the wasted energy the «climate community» spent mitigating the impact of «deniers,» when «skeptics» could have helped out by listening more carefully to the «climate community,» and trying to understand «the climate community's» arguments, and adding to progress on increasing our understanding of the causes of climate variability and change...»

And in addition, think about all the wasted energy the «climate community» spent mitigating the impact of «deniers,» when «skeptics» could have helped out by listening more carefully to the «climate community,» and trying to understand «the climate community's» arguments, and adding to progress on increasing our understanding of the causes of climate variability and change — rather than apologizing or ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «media whores,» or the long line of denizens at Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capiclimate community» spent mitigating the impact of «deniers,» when «skeptics» could have helped out by listening more carefully to the «climate community,» and trying to understand «the climate community's» arguments, and adding to progress on increasing our understanding of the causes of climate variability and change — rather than apologizing or ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «media whores,» or the long line of denizens at Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capiclimate community,» and trying to understand «the climate community's» arguments, and adding to progress on increasing our understanding of the causes of climate variability and change — rather than apologizing or ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «media whores,» or the long line of denizens at Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capiclimate community's» arguments, and adding to progress on increasing our understanding of the causes of climate variability and change — rather than apologizing or ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «media whores,» or the long line of denizens at Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capiclimate variability and change — rather than apologizing or ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «media whores,» or the long line of denizens at Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capiClimate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capiclimate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capitalism.

Instead of discussing the uncertainties and seeking to reduce them, many in both the community of climate change advocates or the community of climate change skeptics choose to defame each other with derogatory titles.

The study made Watts something of a star in the climate - skeptic community, earning him national press and television appearances.

It is the failure of the many in the climate community to draw this distinction between deniers and skeptics that has resulted in this problem.»

Believe it or not, there are liberal skeptics in the climate community, as there are also perfectly patriotic liberals in this nation.

Soon, one of few skeptics in the climate science community, described the paper that was published in the journal Physical Geography as «fairly significant scientifically in that this is the first successful formulation of a sun - climate connection.»

Curry has been engaging actively with the climate change skeptic community, largely by participating on outsider blogs... Alon...

Skeptics are winning because the AGW community was wrong to claim that we are facing or will face some grave climate crisis, and no matter how many studies believers come up with to claim otherwise, the climate continues to fail to cooperate with the apocalypse.

What skeptics are «skeptical» about is one or more of the bald assertions of the alarmist community — usually that the current round of climate changes are: abnormal, harmful, or (primarily) anthropogenic.

According to Roger Pielke Jr., the New York Times writer Andy Revkin was threatened with the «Big Cutoff» from the climate science community by Michael Schlesinger, a climate scientist from the University of Illinois, for the sin of «gutter reportage» and for providing space in his Times blog for skeptics.

Every time climate science has another crack at misanthropy the cool headed skeptics in the scientific community become more determined to show the world just how much of a laughingstock they are, in my opinion, the «Man Made Global Warming» alarmists are kicking a sleeping giant!

In March 2010, the United Kingdom's House of Commons Science and Technology Committee published a report finding that the skeptics» criticisms of the CRU were misplaced, and that its actions «were in line with common practice in the climate science community.»

If you concede that climate skeptics have not proven in peer - reviewed journals that human - induced warming is not a very serious threat to human health and ecological systems, given that human - induced warming could create catastrophic warming the longer the human community waits to respond to reduce the threat of climate change and the more difficult it will be to prevent dangerous warming, do you agree that those nations most responsible for rising atmospheric ghg concentrations have a duty to demonstrate that their ghg emissions are safe?

If you concede that climate skeptics have not proven in peer - reviewed journals that human - induced warming is not a very serious threat to human health and ecological systems, given that human - induced warming could create catastrophic warming the longer the human community waits to respond to reduce the threat of climate change and the more difficult it will be to prevent dangerous warming, do you agree that those responsible for rising atmospheric ghg concentrations have a duty to demonstrate that their ghg emissions are safe?

By calling the science «still incomplete,» Bush also lent new credibility to the tiny handful of industry - sponsored «greenhouse skeptics» who have been thoroughly discredited by the mainstream community of climate researchers — including the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the National Academy of Sciences and other blue - ribbon scientific groups that deem global warming to be real, immediate and oclimate researchers — including the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the National Academy of Sciences and other blue - ribbon scientific groups that deem global warming to be real, immediate and oClimate Change (IPCC), the National Academy of Sciences and other blue - ribbon scientific groups that deem global warming to be real, immediate and ominous.

The vision of the skeptic community denying that the world is warming at all is a straw man created by the climate catastrophists to avoid arguing about the much more important point in her second paragraph.

There should be spaces in our communities where climate skeptics can speak freely.

So, on the one hand, some «skeptics» (including Judith) paint the «climate science community» as a whole as being «asymmetrically» tribal and partisan, yet on the other hand, those same skeptics seek to create distinctions within their own community that they won't allow for in the «climate science community.»

When the «climate science community» takes steps to control for biases — and those steps are rejected by some «skeptics,» it leaves me wondering what those «skeptics» are really interested in.

Many climate skeptics suspect that the climate science community is caught up in political conformity that leans toward alarmism, and that alternative ideas about the causes and risks of climate change can not break through peer review.

Between a research - gutting proposed budget, regulation - slashing executive orders, the appointment of climate change skeptics to head the Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Energy, and bogus claims about vaccines, infectious diseases, and global warming, it's no secret that President Donald Trump has demonstrated indifference to empirical fact and hostility to the scientific community.

Likewise, since before I ever became a skeptic, the establishment climate scientists and their supporters have been characterizing, ad infinitum, the skeptical community as shills of the oil industry and other large industrial concerns, and especially as paid - off pawns of right - wing think tanks and right - wing concerns.

The accusations of tribalism among the «climate community» have to do with funding, peer reviews, IPCC process etc. — something that the skeptics don't have equivalent versions of — YET.

Within the community of climate scientists, the Mann activist group is vastly more egregious that Judith and most skeptics within the climate science community.

If skeptics within the climate science community are starved of funding how would we know if they have a strong case or whether the so - called consensus is merely an artifact of them getting all the research grants?

As part of our contribution, CSW commented that the document might carry greater relevance for decision - makers who want to advance a needed adaptation agenda to an unconvinced or climate - skeptic audience (a very real possibility) by including more explicit language on the ways in which climate change issues can be framed to appeal to diverse groups — for example, emphasizing the potential damages to people and property to one community, the negative impacts to industry in another.

Attracted to fringe scientists like the small and vocal group of climate skeptics, Republicans appear to be alienated from a mainstream scientific community that by and large doesn't share their political beliefs.

In July 2009, the Business Insider's Green Sheet named him third in its list of the Ten Most - Respected Global Warming Skeptics and commented that «Myron Ebell may be enemy # 1 to the current climate change community.»

IMO, climate skeptic Rawls shot at the IPCC is the worst thing that's happened to the climate contrarian community in recent memory.

The «Vampire Memo» from the Intermountain Rural Electric Association (IREA) draws on the work of such industry - funded skeptics as Pat Michaels, Fred Singer, Robert Balling and Craig Idso — as well as such ideologues as Richard Lindzen and William Gray who have long been laughingstocks in the community of mainstream climate scientists.

For the community of catastrophic global warming skeptics, it is a very welcome and enjoyable «climate change» schadenfreude with Trump's election...

Few here would dispute that we find plenty of bias in the skeptic community where peer review quality is even more lacking than in the mainstream climate community.

Within the community of scientists and others concerned about anthropogenic climate change, those whom Inhofe called skeptics are more commonly termed contrarians, naysayers and denialists.