Sentences with phrase «climate warming believer»

But IF you say the word, NUCLEAR, these same climate warming believer's will behave just like the denier's do.

Not exact matches

Stopping overpopulation is one way the dangers of climate change can be mitigated, according to two of the most prominent believers in global warming.

By inventing the therm» pause» you guys are delaying the inevitable:» global» warming doesn't exist / H2O is regulating the climate, not CO2!The truth exist; truth is much more important than million believers: https://globalwarmingdenier.wordpress.com/2014/07/12/cooling-earth/

After following the global warming saga — science and policy — for nearly a quarter century, I've seen the biases at the journals and N.S.F. (including their press releases sometimes), in the I.P.C.C. summary process (the deep reports are mainly sloppy in some cases; the summary writing — read the climate - extinction section of this post — is where the spin lies), and sometimes in the statements and work of individual researchers (both skeptics and «believers»).

«Global warming believers are like a hysterical «cult»: MIT scientist compares «climate alarmists» to religious fanatics,» Daily Mail Online, January 22, 2015.

An atmospheric scientist and evangelical Christian, Hayhoe is a firm believer in manmade climate change and recently addressed a UN-sponsored climate change conference in Edmonton, Alberta, on the woes that await the human race if global warming is not curbed.

Harris cites the work of PhD - level climate scientists and atmospheric physicists who've studied global warming for decades, and none of these skeptics deny climate science in any general sense of the word — that's another unsupportable talking point from believers of catastrophic man - caused global warming.

As I've said on several occasions here and elsewhere, the major problem with global warming believers» enslavement to the «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» phrase is that it is not in any way proof of an arrangement between between skeptics and industry officials involving payments made for false climate assessments.

I bet a climate - change true believer about 5 years ago that within 10 years the wheels would be coming off the global warming bus.

True believers in the theory of man - made climate change can't understand how anyone can question the «overwhelming evidence» that mankind is causing dangerous global warming.

Over on the Energy from Thorium forum (where believers outnumber sceptics, but not hugely so) the preferred abbreviation is AGWCC (Anthropogenic Global Warming Climate Catastrophe).

Similar to other talking points from the Al Gore side of the issue (e.g. the «tobacco industry parallel,» and the «inconsistent statements» notion), the bit about influential climate deniers having «a big megaphone» is a single - serving talking point, meant to be swallowed without question by the general public and regurgitated instantly by global warming believers when the need arises.

Or, at least, none of the consensus climate models predicted this cooling, which is why, to avoid looking completely ridiculous, AGW believers now refer to «climate change» rather than «global warming.»

Back in the early spring of 2007, believers of catastrophic man - caused global warming were no doubt quite happy with Al Gore's «An Inconvenient Truth» movie, Ross Gelbspan's books, prominent pro-global warming blogs, mainstream media outlets, and others who gave essentially no fair play to the presentation of detailed climate assessments from skeptic climate scientists.

While believers in anthropogenic global warming claim the climate is on a new trajectory with continuous warming, there is an alternative scientific literature that recognises these 60 - year cycles.

Ironically, just a few years ago, believers in anthropogenic (man - caused) global warming — since renamed «climate change» — claimed cold weather and snow would soon be just a memory.

Those who question the myth of global warming are passionate believers in climate change — it is the global warmers who deny that climate change is the norm.»

(B) s «belief» should lead them to put climate mitigation at the top of their list of concerns, and the presence of these «hollow» believers proves that the doctrine of CAGW is Culturally Determined, since there is no similarly contradictory group of nonbelievers in CAGW (presumably they would be nonbelievers in CAGW who demand that trillions should be spent to mitigate global warming).

Why Warmists Hate Debate: Flashback 2007: Scientific Smackdown: Skeptics Voted The Clear Winners Against Global Warming Believers in Heated NYC Debate — NASA & RealClimate.org's Gavin Schmidt appeared so demoralized that he mused that debates equally split between believers of a climate «crisis» and scientific skeptics are probably not «worthwhile» to ever agreeBelievers in Heated NYC Debate — NASA & RealClimate.org's Gavin Schmidt appeared so demoralized that he mused that debates equally split between believers of a climate «crisis» and scientific skeptics are probably not «worthwhile» to ever agreebelievers of a climate «crisis» and scientific skeptics are probably not «worthwhile» to ever agree to again

«[W] e have to reject the false alternative of «climate change believer» or «climate change denier» and become «climate thinkers» — people who think carefully about the magnitude of man - made warming and compare it with the unique benefits of fossil fuels,» Epstein adds.

Flashback 2007: Scientific Smackdown: Skeptics Voted The Clear Winners Against Global Warming Believers in Heated NYC Debate — NASA's Gavin Schmidt appeared so demoralized that he mused that debates equally split between believers of a climate «crisis» and scientific skeptics are probably not «worthwhile» to ever agree to again - Schmidt on his teams debate loss: «We were pretty dulBelievers in Heated NYC Debate — NASA's Gavin Schmidt appeared so demoralized that he mused that debates equally split between believers of a climate «crisis» and scientific skeptics are probably not «worthwhile» to ever agree to again - Schmidt on his teams debate loss: «We were pretty dulbelievers of a climate «crisis» and scientific skeptics are probably not «worthwhile» to ever agree to again - Schmidt on his teams debate loss: «We were pretty dull.»

What we should take away from the whole sorry episode is that this zeal for challenging the character of climate - change skeptics — while excusing both the political / financial connections, and sloppy science, of true believers because their cause is supposedly noble — represents the final degeneration of the global warming movement into pure politics.

Even though the number of climate change believers has decreased, the majority of people still believed that the Earth is undergoing global warming and most of them (61 percent of Americans and 57 percent of Canadians) felt it was a «very serious» problem.

Global warming believers across the board trust that the «industry - corrupted skeptic climate scientists» accusation has evidence to back it up, trusting in the notion that their leaders speak with authority about it being exposed by a «Pulitzer Prize - winning investigative journalist.»

Global warming believer - turned - skeptic Anthony Watts, a former TV meteorologist, posted a new report online questioning the reliability of weather stations in the U.S. Historical Climatology Network, a 120 - year - old weather system that forms one tent pole of climate measurements.

and ofcourse some true believers would spin this as global climate change — a code word for the absent warming...

This runaway effect that manmade climate change believers talk about comes from the hypothesis that climate change feedback mechanisms are positive and the small warming we have experienced will lead to drastic increases in global temperature.

The 94 year - old scientist, famous for his Gaia hypothesis that Earth is a self - regulating, single organism, also said that he had been too certain about the rate of global warming in his past book, that «it's just as silly to be a [climate] denier as it is to be a believer» and that fracking and nuclear power should power the UK, not renewable sources such as windfarms.

I am a card - carrying scientist... Please, climate skeptics, drop by and read this on why we think anthropogenic global warming is true; true believers, drop by and read the lot.

If you get beyond the hard core of near religious believers in the massive warming scenarios, the average global warming supporter would answer this paper by saying: «Yes there is a lot of uncertainty, but though the doomsday warming scenarios via runaway positive feedback in the climate can't be proven, they are so bad that we need to cut back on CO2 production just to be on the safe side.»

* According to the Berkeley group, the Earth's surface temperature will have risen (on average) slightly less than what indicated by NASA, NOAA and the Met Office * Differences will be on the edge of statistical significance, leaving a lot open to subjective interpretation * Several attempts will be made by climate change conformists and True Believers to smear the work of BEST, and to prevent them from publishing their data * After publication, organised groups of people will try to cloud the issue to the point of leaving the public unsure about what exactly was found by BEST * New questions will be raised regarding UHI, however the next IPCC assessment's first draft will be singularly forgetful of any peer - reviewed paper on the topic * We will all be left with a slightly - warming world, the only other certitude being that all mitigation efforts will be among the stupidest ideas that ever sprung to human mind.