The research, which got mainstream media attention, projected at what date certain regions would shift to new
climates as a result of global warming (ClimateWire, Oct. 10, 2013).
Not exact matches
The changes to our planet
as a
result of global warming are apparent for all to see: the receding glaciers in temperate
climates, the reduction in rainfall and advancing deserts in Africa and the lakes in the Mideast and Asia that are virtually disappearing.
«Our
results indicate that a wide range
of POPs have been remobilized into the Arctic atmosphere over the past two decades
as a
result of climate change, confirming that Arctic warming could undermine global efforts to reduce environmental and human exposure to these toxic chemicals,» write the scientists, whose analysis was published yesterday in the journal Nature Climate
climate change, confirming that Arctic
warming could undermine
global efforts to reduce environmental and human exposure to these toxic chemicals,» write the scientists, whose analysis was published yesterday in the journal Nature
Climate Climate Change.
As a
result, more
of human emissions would remain in the atmosphere, increasing the greenhouse effect that contributes to
global warming and alters Earth's
climate.
These models currently predict that
as a
result of today's
global climate change, Antarctica will
warm twice
as much
as the rest
of the planet, though it won't reach its peak for a couple
of hundred years.
Results of a new study by researchers at the Northeast
Climate Science Center (NECSC) at the University of Massachusetts Amherst suggest that temperatures across the northeastern United States will increase much faster than the global average, so that the 2 - degrees Celsius warming target adopted in the recent Paris Agreement on climate change will be reached about 20 years earlier for this part of the U.S. compared to the world as a
Climate Science Center (NECSC) at the University
of Massachusetts Amherst suggest that temperatures across the northeastern United States will increase much faster than the
global average, so that the 2 - degrees Celsius
warming target adopted in the recent Paris Agreement on
climate change will be reached about 20 years earlier for this part of the U.S. compared to the world as a
climate change will be reached about 20 years earlier for this part
of the U.S. compared to the world
as a whole.
Scientists have long explained that winter and record cold snaps will not disappear
as a
result of climate change, and that cold spikes may get worse
as a
result of shifting weather patterns under
global warming.
Now, with regional
climates shifting
as a
result of global warming, it is unclear just how far — and how fast — organisms will need to travel to keep up with moving
climates.
«The
results imply that reforestation projects and efforts to avoid further deforestation are
of the utmost importance in our pursuit to limit
global warming to below 2oC,
as stated in the Paris
climate agreement.»
The Hadley Centre has calculated the massive increase in atmospheric CO2 levels if the Amazon was to die back
as a
result of global warming (
climate models differ on how likely this is, I understand).
And since
climate scientists project at least that much
warming by the middle
of the 21st century,
global warming could begin to accelerate
as a
result, in what's known
as a feedback mechanism.
Global climate change will occur as a result of global warming resulting from the greenhouse effect caused by the retention of heat in the lower atmosphere of the Earth caused by the concentration of gases of various
Global climate change will occur
as a
result of global warming resulting from the greenhouse effect caused by the retention of heat in the lower atmosphere of the Earth caused by the concentration of gases of various
global warming resulting from the greenhouse effect caused by the retention
of heat in the lower atmosphere
of the Earth caused by the concentration
of gases
of various kinds.
As a
result of global warming, our Earth's changing
climate will continue to profoundly alter national parks including Golden Gate National Recreation Area.
Just
as many
of the home runs hit by a baseball player on steroids were almost certainly due to the taking
of steroids — even if you can't prove that any one home run
resulted from it — so too is it likely that the record - breaking heat we are seeing in the U.S. this summer
of 2012 is very likely due, in substantial part, to the impact
of human - caused
climate change and
global warming.
The IPCC predictions
of global warming imply that, at the very least, millions
of people will die
as a
result of climate change, much like the casualty numbers in World Wars I and II.
Quoting directly
Climate change
as a
result of human activities, or anthropogenic
global warming, is now generally accepted
as reality and includes a wide range
of climatic processes and impacts in the
global system that are affected by human activities.
As a
result, all
of the standard
climate models understate the rate
of global warming.
It is interesting to note that the Lefties who push the
Global Warming agenda have quickly changed the terminology to
Climate Change
as a direct
result of the work
of some more critical members
of the scientific community that started with more probing and critical research.
No matter what short term metrics are applied, the Arctic is undergoing long term rapid melting, dominantly
as a
result of human - induced
global warming and
climate change.
In an email, he said: «
As everyone notes, any particular occurrence of a climate anomaly can not be shown in any deterministic fashion to have occurred as a result of global warmin
As everyone notes, any particular occurrence
of a
climate anomaly can not be shown in any deterministic fashion to have occurred
as a result of global warmin
as a
result of global warming.
• Anyone who doubts that the threat
of large hurricanes is still being used
as part
of global warming campaigns should look no further than the energy and climate platform of a presidential candidate [pdf alert], who writes, «Global warming is real, is happening now and is the result of human activ
global warming campaigns should look no further than the energy and
climate platform
of a presidential candidate [pdf alert], who writes, «
Global warming is real, is happening now and is the result of human activ
Global warming is real, is happening now and is the
result of human activities.
But in the debate over a response to
global warming, there were blinders on a lot
of Democrats,
as well — blinders that
resulted for far too long in a one - solution focus on a comprehensive, and doomed, cap - and - trade
climate bill.
As a result, Americans don't see global warming as an urgent issue, putting climate policy low on the list of prioritie
As a
result, Americans don't see
global warming as an urgent issue, putting climate policy low on the list of prioritie
as an urgent issue, putting
climate policy low on the list
of priorities.
«In considering the question
of human activity and
climate change it is essential to distinguish between
global warming, which is a progressive increase in the annual mean
global temperature, and human - activity - induced greenhouse
warming,
as may, for example, be caused by the release
of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere
as a
result of fossil fuel combustion or deforestation.»
Climate alarmism is not based on empirical observation; rather, it is entirely predicated on computer models that are manipulated to generate predictions
of significant
global warming as a
result of increased concentrations
of CO2.
13 Human Impact on
Climate Changes
Global Warming As a result of increases in CO2 as well as other greenhouse gases, global temperatures have incr
Global Warming As a result of increases in CO2 as well as other greenhouse gases, global temperatures have increase
As a
result of increases in CO2
as well as other greenhouse gases, global temperatures have increase
as well
as other greenhouse gases, global temperatures have increase
as other greenhouse gases,
global temperatures have incr
global temperatures have increased.
So, while it may be a mouthful, I'll use phrases like «
Climate Change
as a
result of human - caused
Global Warming.»
This assumption is based on
climate model
results that gave high
climate sensitivity for doubling
of CO2 by smoothing out all the oscillation in GMST before the 1970s and leaving untouched the
warming phase
of the oscillation since then and calling it man - made
global warming as shown below.
«The human impact on
global climate is small, and any
warming that may occur
as a
result of human carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gas emissions is likely to have little effect on
global temperatures, the cryosphere (ice - covered areas), hydrosphere (oceans, lakes, and rivers), or weather.
As a
result of the significant scientific effort to date, aided by public concern, models simulating
climate change have gained considerable skill... There will be many scientific and technical challenges along the way, but the hope is that simulations
of the
global environment will be able to maximise the number
of people around the world who can adapt to, and be protected from the worst impacts
of,
global warming.
Earth already has a very complicated but natural system
of climate temperature control, technically referred to
as emergent
climate phenomena, which have the
result that catastrophic
global warming can not occur.
Included here are the
climate - change - related costs
of extreme weather events such
as Hurricanes Irene (which
resulted in damages totaling $ 20 billion) and Sandy ($ 65 billion), along with the costs we incur from increasingly dangerous floods, wildfires, and heat waves that are fueled by
global warming.
«I was forwarded the chain
of e-mails on the 12th October, which are comments from some
of the worlds leading
climate scientists written
as a direct
result of my article «whatever happened to
global warming».
Rather than questioning the primary role
of the atmospheric CO2, our modelling
results allow us to put forward that the atmospheric CO2 is not the whole story and that, owing to the overwhelming effect and interplay between the paleogeography, the water cycle and the seasonal response, the
climate system may undergo subtle climatic changes (
as the 4 °C
global warming simulated here between the Aptian and the Maastrichtian runs).
Increasing concentrations
of greenhouse gases such
as carbon dioxide and methane increase the temperature
of the lower atmosphere by restricting the outward passage
of emitted radiation,
resulting in «
global warming,» or, more broadly,
global climate change.»
«The author writes that «in the context
of global climate change, urban
warming can bias
results obtained for background monitoring,
as many
of the observatories that have been in operation for a long time are located in cities.»
It is but a small step from explaining to the public how the
climate will change
as the
result of global warming due to increasing atmospheric CO2, to explaining what can and what needs to be done to counteract the
global warming.
As a
result, their computer predictions
of future
climate trends show dramatic
global warming roughly proportional to projected carbon dioxide concentrations in the future.
26 July: EgyptianStreets: For most Egyptians,
global warming and
climate change are seemingly foreign concepts - ones that are confined in occurrence and consequences to faraway lands... Because they are virtually non-existent concepts in the public consciousness, most Egyptians are unaware
of the immense harm that can befall their country
as a
result of climate change and its potentially devastating impacts on Egypt... http://egyptianstreets.com/2015/07/26/egypt-to-witness-grave-consequences-within-10-years-if-
global-
warming-endures/
Two
global -
warming skeptics who questioned an influential
climate study and prompted a congressional inquiry are now facing critics
of their own,
as a pair
of new research papers take issue with their
results.
Reductions in emissions
of black carbon since the late 1980s, mostly from diesel engines
as a
result of air quality programs, have
resulted in a measurable reduction
of concentrations
of global warming pollutants in the atmosphere, according to a first -
of - its - kind study — which Berkeley Lab participated in — examining the impact
of black carbon on California's
climate.
(Revised September 23, 2016 by addition
of a new final section by Dr. James Wallace)
As discussed in my book, Environmentalism Gone Mad, two
of the reasonable inferences from the Catastrophic Anthropogenic
Global Warming (CAGW) hypothesis (the scientific basis for the world climate scare pushed by the United Nations and the Obama Administration) are that atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) levels should affect global temperatures, and that the resulting heat generated should be observable by a hot spot about 10 km over the tr
Global Warming (CAGW) hypothesis (the scientific basis for the world
climate scare pushed by the United Nations and the Obama Administration) are that atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) levels should affect
global temperatures, and that the resulting heat generated should be observable by a hot spot about 10 km over the tr
global temperatures, and that the
resulting heat generated should be observable by a hot spot about 10 km over the tropics.
Sacramento — Reductions in emissions
of black carbon since the late 1980s, mostly from diesel engines
as a
result of air quality programs, have
resulted in a measurable reduction
of concentrations
of global warming pollutants in the atmosphere, according to a first -
of - its - kind study examining the impact
of black carbon on California's
climate.
The UN's IPCC and associated
climate alarmist scientists predicted that severe weather would increase globally
as a
result of human - caused
global warming.
And goodly Archbishop Rowan Williams, who self - evidently understands little about the science, has warned
of «millions, billions»
of deaths
as a
result of global warming and threatened Mr Blair with the wrath
of the
climate God unless he acts.
Scaling the
results from both theory
as well
as climate model projections suggest, then, that roughly 3 %
of hurricane rainfall today can be reasonably attributed to manmade
global warming.
«
Climate science» as it is used by warmists implies adherence to a set of beliefs: (1) Increasing greenhouse gas concentrations will warm the Earth's surface and atmosphere; (2) Human production of CO2 is producing significant increases in CO2 concentration; (3) The rate of rise of temperature in the 20th and 21st centuries is unprecedented compared to the rates of change of temperature in the previous two millennia and this can only be due to rising greenhouse gas concentrations; (4) The climate of the 19th century was ideal and may be taken as a standard to compare against any current climate; (5) global climate models, while still not perfect, are good enough to indicate that continued use of fossil fuels at projected rates in the 21st century will cause the CO2 concentration to rise to a high level by 2100 (possibly 700 to 900 ppm); (6) The global average temperature under this condition will rise more than 3 °C from the late 19th century ideal; (7) The negative impact on humanity of such a rise will be enormous; (8) The only alternative to such a disaster is to immediately and sharply reduce CO2 emissions (reducing emissions in 2050 by 80 % compared to today's rate) and continue further reductions after 2050; (9) Even with such draconian CO2 reductions, the CO2 concentration is likely to reach at least 450 to 500 ppm by 2100 resulting in significant damage to humanity; (10) Such reductions in CO2 emissions are technically feasible and economically affordable while providing adequate energy to a growing world population that is increasingly industria
Climate science»
as it is used by warmists implies adherence to a set
of beliefs: (1) Increasing greenhouse gas concentrations will
warm the Earth's surface and atmosphere; (2) Human production
of CO2 is producing significant increases in CO2 concentration; (3) The rate
of rise
of temperature in the 20th and 21st centuries is unprecedented compared to the rates
of change
of temperature in the previous two millennia and this can only be due to rising greenhouse gas concentrations; (4) The
climate of the 19th century was ideal and may be taken as a standard to compare against any current climate; (5) global climate models, while still not perfect, are good enough to indicate that continued use of fossil fuels at projected rates in the 21st century will cause the CO2 concentration to rise to a high level by 2100 (possibly 700 to 900 ppm); (6) The global average temperature under this condition will rise more than 3 °C from the late 19th century ideal; (7) The negative impact on humanity of such a rise will be enormous; (8) The only alternative to such a disaster is to immediately and sharply reduce CO2 emissions (reducing emissions in 2050 by 80 % compared to today's rate) and continue further reductions after 2050; (9) Even with such draconian CO2 reductions, the CO2 concentration is likely to reach at least 450 to 500 ppm by 2100 resulting in significant damage to humanity; (10) Such reductions in CO2 emissions are technically feasible and economically affordable while providing adequate energy to a growing world population that is increasingly industria
climate of the 19th century was ideal and may be taken
as a standard to compare against any current
climate; (5) global climate models, while still not perfect, are good enough to indicate that continued use of fossil fuels at projected rates in the 21st century will cause the CO2 concentration to rise to a high level by 2100 (possibly 700 to 900 ppm); (6) The global average temperature under this condition will rise more than 3 °C from the late 19th century ideal; (7) The negative impact on humanity of such a rise will be enormous; (8) The only alternative to such a disaster is to immediately and sharply reduce CO2 emissions (reducing emissions in 2050 by 80 % compared to today's rate) and continue further reductions after 2050; (9) Even with such draconian CO2 reductions, the CO2 concentration is likely to reach at least 450 to 500 ppm by 2100 resulting in significant damage to humanity; (10) Such reductions in CO2 emissions are technically feasible and economically affordable while providing adequate energy to a growing world population that is increasingly industria
climate; (5)
global climate models, while still not perfect, are good enough to indicate that continued use of fossil fuels at projected rates in the 21st century will cause the CO2 concentration to rise to a high level by 2100 (possibly 700 to 900 ppm); (6) The global average temperature under this condition will rise more than 3 °C from the late 19th century ideal; (7) The negative impact on humanity of such a rise will be enormous; (8) The only alternative to such a disaster is to immediately and sharply reduce CO2 emissions (reducing emissions in 2050 by 80 % compared to today's rate) and continue further reductions after 2050; (9) Even with such draconian CO2 reductions, the CO2 concentration is likely to reach at least 450 to 500 ppm by 2100 resulting in significant damage to humanity; (10) Such reductions in CO2 emissions are technically feasible and economically affordable while providing adequate energy to a growing world population that is increasingly industria
climate models, while still not perfect, are good enough to indicate that continued use
of fossil fuels at projected rates in the 21st century will cause the CO2 concentration to rise to a high level by 2100 (possibly 700 to 900 ppm); (6) The
global average temperature under this condition will rise more than 3 °C from the late 19th century ideal; (7) The negative impact on humanity
of such a rise will be enormous; (8) The only alternative to such a disaster is to immediately and sharply reduce CO2 emissions (reducing emissions in 2050 by 80 % compared to today's rate) and continue further reductions after 2050; (9) Even with such draconian CO2 reductions, the CO2 concentration is likely to reach at least 450 to 500 ppm by 2100
resulting in significant damage to humanity; (10) Such reductions in CO2 emissions are technically feasible and economically affordable while providing adequate energy to a growing world population that is increasingly industrializing.
As the world wobbles The issue of increased damage from extreme weather driven disasters as a result of climate change is attracts the same polemic that the gallery previously observed about climate change and global warmin
As the world wobbles The issue
of increased damage from extreme weather driven disasters
as a result of climate change is attracts the same polemic that the gallery previously observed about climate change and global warmin
as a
result of climate change is attracts the same polemic that the gallery previously observed about
climate change and
global warming.
And rates are expected to continue increasing
as global warming, which
climate scientists agree is the
result of greenhouse gas emissions, continues.
[10 Surprising
Results of Global Warming] The Sun's Energy Scientists and astronomers have studied the impact
of the Sun on the Earth's
climate as far back
as the early 1800s.