Twentieth century global sea level, as determined from tide gauges in coastal harbors, has been increasing by 1.7 - 1.8 mm / yr, apparently related to the recent
climatic warming trend.
Overall, these high record numbers are quantitatively consistent with those expected for the observed
climatic warming trend with added stationary white noise.
We conclude that the 2010 Moscow heat record is, with 80 % probability, due to the long - term
climatic warming trend.
For the Moscow heat record of July 2010, they found that the probability of a record had increased five-fold due to the local
climatic warming trend, as compared to a stationary climate (see our previous articles The Moscow warming hole and On record - breaking extremes for further discussion).
Not exact matches
To explore the links between
climatic warming and rainfall in drylands, scientists from the Universities of Cardiff and Bristol analysed more than 50 years of detailed rainfall data (measured every minute) from a semi-arid drainage basin in south east Arizona exhibiting an upward
trend in temperatures during that period.
Since individual clouds have a life time of hours, and the CRF - interpretation involves changes in the reflected light as well as ionisation, a
climatic response from change in CRF is hypothetically almost instantaneous, and it is a challenge to explain why the night side (where there is no sunlight and hence reflection can not play a role)
warms more strongly than the dayside, if the CRF were to drive the recent
warming trend.
Honestly, anybody who claims that «there has been global cooling or that global
warming has halted since 2000 (or whatever)» really does not understand
climatic trends nor the difference between a long - term underlying
trend vs. short - term fluctuations which have a larger magnitude (in both directions) than the
trend.
This is also something that has been observed, e.g. in Norway, where the
climatic trends result in more
warm than cold seasons.
Since individual clouds have a life time of hours, and the CRF - interpretation involves changes in the reflected light as well as ionisation, a
climatic response from change in CRF is hypothetically almost instantaneous, and it is a challenge to explain why the night side (where there is no sunlight and hence reflection can not play a role)
warms more strongly than the dayside, if the CRF were to drive the recent
warming trend.
There are many natural
climatic cycles that we already know of, and the current
warming trend may just be part of one that we have not yet identified.
As described in the paper, climate
warming specifically refers to the slow time evolution of the local July temperature as described by a smooth non-linear
trend line, which reveals a significant
climatic warming over the last three decades.
Clearly, any
warming impact of CO2 emissions has barely surpassed the per century
trend produced by natural
climatic forces from 1919 - 1943.
When the National
Climatic Data Center apply their Time - of - observation adjustments to their Partially adjusted dataset, this introduces an extra
warming trend into the data.
Now, adding to this miserably low
warming influence of CO2 is the recent admission by establishment climate science that natural
climatic forces have a powerful say in the
trend of global temperatures, regardless of human CO2 emissions.
«We conclude that extreme
climatic events are key drivers of biodiversity patterns and that the frequency and intensity of such episodes have major implications for predictive models of species distribution and ecosystem structure, which are largely based on gradual
warming trends.»
However after 1980, due to changes in instrumentation, it is not clear how much of the exaggerated rising
trend is due to
climatic factors (natural or CO2) or the result of a
warming bias caused by new instruments.
Ocean temperatures tied with 2006 as the fifth
warmest on record, and a
warming trend in the central and eastern equatorial Pacific signals a coming El Nino event, NOAA's National
Climatic Data Center stated.
And the MMTS rural 1,2 stations with the
trend 0.032 are the only ones which are relevant for assessing the real
climatic warming.
In Alaska, the onset of a
climatic shift — a
warming — in 1976 - 1977 ended the multidecade cold
trend in the mid-20th century returning temperatures to those of the early 20th century.
Superimposed on the long - term
trends are occasional global
warming spikes, «hyperthermals», most prominently the Palaeocene — Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) at approximately 56 Myr BP [12] and the Mid-Eocene
Climatic Optimum at approximately 42 Myr BP [13], coincident with large temporary increases of atmospheric CO2.
But as this Holland dataset confirms, the actual empirical global and regional
trends of a
climatic shift of ever more severe weather events do not support the alarmists» predictions; the irrational fears of more frequent / larger weather disasters as a result of CO2 or global / regional «
warming» is unjustified, per the scientific evidence.
But wouldn't a warmist have to concede that even without humans on the planet that there must be dramatic pivot points in
climatic timeline
trends where
warming would necessarily rapidly accelerate by default, measurable over multi decadal levels?
The nation is experiencing «a super-heated spike on top of a decades - long
warming trend,» [according to the] National
Climatic Data Center.»
I have measured a
warming trend by analysing atmospheric refraction of the sun, at two distinct
climatic locations, 2000 miles apart, and found the sun disk getting bigger every year at both locations, sun disks were especially bigger this year.
Current
climatic warming simply does not accord with the
trends, neither in terms of direction or (especially) amplitude.