Yesterday the Supreme Court struck down a Texas law that would have forced
the closure of abortion clinics that didn't meet strict requirements — requirements the justices decided (by a 5 - to - 3 margin) didn't make women any safer and put an undue burden on their constitutional right to seek safe and legal medical care.
Not exact matches
«
Abortion restrictions and
clinic closures mean that patients may need to travel greater distances to access services,» said Rachel Jones, lead author
of the study, in a written release.
New research from the Texas Policy Evaluation Project (TxPEP) exploring the impact
of House Bill 2 (HB 2)-- the restrictive Texas
abortion law that was struck down by the Supreme Court — found that increases in travel distance to the nearest
abortion clinic caused by
clinic closures were closely associated with decreases in the official number
of abortions.
«Our study gives further insight into the ways that the
clinic closures due to Texas's restrictive law resulted in an undue burden on women seeking access to
abortion care in Texas,» said Daniel Grossman, MD, an investigator with TxPEP and director
of Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH) at UC San Francisco.
Because
of an increasingly restrictive legal environment and
clinic closures across the country,
abortion patients are facing new barriers to care, including the need to travel greater distances to access services.2, 20 Overcoming these challenges can be difficult or impossible, especially given that 75 %
of abortion patients are low - income, and 59 % have already had a child and may have other family obligations.21 Whether a provider offers same - day contraceptive services is irrelevant if a patient can not access
abortion care in the first place.