pathetic when you see how much other
club value their players
They are probably going to sign bakayoko, who is a player I think we need, viera type of player, but we didn't want him, we are not after the same players, there are plenty options in the market, the question is can winger pay what
the clubs value their player?
Oxford was the subject of a # 8 million bid from Monchengladbach in January which was rejected by West Ham with
the club valuing the player at around # 12 million.
Not exact matches
There's no stone - wall guarantee that we're even targeting one; the overwhelming majority of these rumours are most probably being started by rogue entities looking to boost
players»
value for any
clubs that ARE lining up bids for them.
Arsenal aren't the biggest spenders so perhaps won't go higher than # 70m, but in truth Madrid should perhaps take the money and run for an injury - prone
player low on confidence whose time at the
club is surely up and whose
value may only continue to tumble down in coming transfer windows.
Every manager plays that game, either to get the
player to sign, or to put the
player in the shop window for better
value (usually, while insisting to the media that the
club ain't selling).
I would hate to see him in a POOL jersey next summer but to pay over a $ 100K a week in wages to an injury prone, one trick pony type of
player is financially reckless from a
club that
values fiscal responsibility.
In the long run this will damage the
club and its
value a lot more than saving 5 or 10 million pounds by not paying more than 35 million for a Lacazette or other badly needed
player.
For example, if Alexis becomes worth an extra # 25 million for signing a new deal, it is worth spending # 25 million on a
player, any
player that will get Alexis to sign... Plus then there would be the new
players value added to the
clubs asset wealth... On paper there would be more than # 25 million added to the
club and share prices will reflect that right?
All Prem
players at all
clubs earn huge wages, which can never remotely be justified in the wider aspect of
value to society.
But all over the world many
players have chosen a point of honour of not playing for
clubs that hurt the
values of the team and fans that made them.
If fans will not boycott the games and stop paying for the tickets then let us at least unite and tell Silent Stan that the CEO is not making him the money that he could, if Silent Stan starts to see Gazidis as a loss to profit then maybe we can get an ambitious CEO in who will help us be ambitious and win titles, use that then to get better business done and add to the
value of the
clubs assets (
players), remove the lowest
value players (not good enough for AFC) and replace them with high
value assets which will increase in
value when we are winning / truly competing at the highest level.
British
players with reasonable talent are guaranteed a top
value and probably top salary to join a top
club because of the home grown rule.
We are no longer a selling
club, so no first team
player should be sold if he's not obsolete, or being sold for more than double / triple his normal
value.
He arrived at the
club amid much fanfare from Real Madrid at a
club record fee — signaling the intent of Wenger to dip into the market for
players with correct
value.
With our billionaire backing AFC should always be counted among the
clubs with an elite of young
players to be
valued not only as world talents but also as assets.
with his attitude as if we have to be his servant, get back to Chilie and get those life
values back, he is a football
player, but a man first, and as a
player and man, his all attitude sucks, i don't know why wenger kept him and take that shit, means we have to take it... I told yo before, get his ass on training camp, ruining all day, shut him up, keep him out of the squad, not even in bench to bring his laim superior attitude... All money he is making, he should think of Chilie street and reality for kids he was once... He is in a great city, a
club that won in this league and would be in CL as every year without this type of laim ways... So, of course no one wants him around during that ceremony, not even in the room... Get real sanchez, you came from misery, benched for years by gardiola too, sell out, poor minded..
It could also make a difference down the line if you want to attract another «marquee»
player The downside to it are: 1) The time that it takes to get to what was mention above could allow a
club more ruthless & willing to pay without negotiating to long «steal» the
player 2) The
player could feel not appreciated at it's true
value.
There was also a concerted effort to purchase and develop younger
players who would provide a solid footing for the football
club to move forward and enhance the
value of the playing squad in the future.
Asour Great Leader Sir Arsene said that the best way to create an identity with the way we play football, to get
players integrated into our culture, with our beliefs, our
values that we felt it would be an interesting experiment to see
players grow together with these qualities, and with a love for the
club, it was an idealistic vision of the world of football.
ok i'll rephrase... Please give an example of a big
club outside of ours who has bought a
player for peanuts with re-sale
value in mind?
Now that we can see light at the end of the tunnel, I am calling all Arsenal fans to change tact while criticizing our coveted
club, manager and
players by substituting «satanic words» of «F» and «S» characters into words that can add
value into the
club's vein and steel, write more articles that can encourage Arsenal
players rather than kill their morale, unite and dissolve abuses coming from rival
club fans and
club enemies like Jose Mourinho.
Otherwise, the
players values rapidly inflated which compelled the
club to pay much higher... Really fed up of the
club's inactivity in every transfer window..
Porto is an extremely difficult
club to deal with and I think the
players»
value is over what Tottenham can afford.»
The
players Wenger signed to strengthen the team, namely Mustafi, Xhaka and Kolasinac are simply not good enough for an aspiring top four team.They along with Czech and Ospina should be the first to be shown the door along with all the
players currently out on loan.The
Club would take a big bit in terms of resale
value but it would free up considerable wages to be utilised in bringing in better quality defenders.Anybody who sees a bright future for Arsenal with Mustafi at Centre Back has my sympathy.
One of the
values of our
club is to give chances to
players who deserve it.»
Finally, not to many comment on Bilic @ West Ham but surely he has done an impressive job as well, showing what
value added an ambitious modern manager can bring to a
club, same for Koeman who lost many of his best
players after is arrival yet has managed to keep Southampton in a very respectable place in the table.
He still represents
value though and I hope the negotiators will try to sell that to
clubs that have interesting
players to boost our squad.
But to be honest which world class
player is available (
clubs willing to sell — Arsenal never try to destabilise
player from other
club) and within our price range (both transfer
value and wage).
with # Brexit (Britain Exit from EU) EPL ll further emphasize the «home - grown rule» and it ll be more difficult to sign
players from outside England as they ll be more xpensive due to the drop in
value of Poundsterling and work - permit issues between English
clubs and other European
players ll be same as it is with SouthAmerican, NorthAmerican, Asian or African
players.It ll be wise for
clubs to complete her transfer plans early..
That and the arrogant way we approach other
clubs makes them feel that they should hike prices as we go in so low for
players that they
value.
With Simpson out of contract with Arsenal next season, whichever
club wins the
player's signature will most certainly get decent
value.
Up front we have a few world - class
players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished
player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the
club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the
players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these
players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch
players, which should be the baseline test for any
player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this
club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly
valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off
If he is, I don't seem to understand why he finds it hard to find quality
players that can add
value to our team when in every window other
clubs around Europe buy and sell quality
players.
Again, if the
player is really top draw and
valued by other
clubs, the last year contract BS would be moot to an extent.
Players from middle to lower weight
clubs who are given their dream moves can also provide great
value before the added points collected by playing in a better team prompts a rise in price:
Gooners already pay more than any other fans, while the
club continually fails to invest the money into the
players that might see us actually get
value for our money.
The system also would ensure that the very best
players eligible for the amateur draft would be paid like the
players from Cuba and other countries are paid, with offers that reflected their actual
value to
clubs.
This would mean 2 things; first, we would never again be able to attract world class
players because they want to be paid their market
value which is higher than 180 / week, secondly any
player we uncover who develops into a world class
player (perhaps a Bellerin) will want to be sold to a
club which is willing to pay market
value.
This has come about because Arsenal has allowed a glut of injured, old, low
value and
players who can go on a free build up at the
club.
Because release clauses are required by law there, oftentimes those clauses will be much higher than the
player's actual
value to discourage bigger
clubs from just triggering it and getting the
player with ease.
I think each
player is
valued highly by Arsene Wenger and by the
club.
Debeuchy and Mustafi are bang average
players who cost this
club around # 47m They are examples of incompetence in the transfer market as they have virtually no sell on
value and contribute precious little to the team when they do play.
There are examples of
clubs overspending and still failing to win major trophies and then you have
clubs like Southampton who have been selling their best
players for many seasons and still seem to produce more from either their youth set up or by buying cheaper replacements who go on to double their
value in just one season.
The 21 year old French international is
valued at # 75m and has been key to the
club's recent domestic domination and is presumably not a
player Juve manager Massimiliano Allegri would want to lose.
Cazzete pursuit means serious business as Our Great Leader Sir Arsene said that the best way to create an identity with the way we play football, to get
players integrated into our culture, with our beliefs, our
values that we felt it would be an interesting experiment to see
players grow together with these qualities, and with a love for the
club, It was an idealistic vision of the world of football.
Which means a willingness to pay what they're worth & getting rid of Walcott would allow the
club to offer as much to an incoming
player: any of them above would be willing to talk for that amount of money & feel
valued.
its frustrating being a gunner every single period of the season including the transfer window... we want to b d best but our transfer situations begs to differ... how many tyms do we need to shout spend, spend, spend b4 dat happens???? wat is d point of being in d «top 10 financially rich
clubs» list every year but don't spend like 1????? sure, we'll buy d odd 30m
player but is it enough... dat stingy prof will always look for «
value» for money spent but he has dat worked out for d past 12 years walcott - waste tbh chamberlain - waste chambers - so far, waste spending 15m five times is 75m which could have been used to buy 2 top 30m signings....
He is a popular figure among fans and the
club players, and whilst letting a
players value decrease may not seem financially beneficial in the short term, it may reap other benefits in the long term.
It doesn't mean we are a selling
club, resale
value comes up If the
player isn't good enough and we «want» (Willingly) to sell him...