Although we have only a few
clues about the nature of the appearance of Jesus to Paul, we must not assume that it was necessarily a vision of the historical Jesus standing before him.
The timing and strength of the electromagnetic radiation at different wavelengths provided scientists with
clues about the nature of the phenomena created by the initial neutron - star collision.
For a century, psychologists and neurologists have recorded people's behaviour, invented abstract computer models of mental processes and chopped up dead brains in their quest for
clues about the nature of consciousness.
The CfA researchers also found more
clues about the nature of SN 2017egm.
Vincent Fernandez explains: «each time we had a new bone virtually extracted, we had a new
clue about the nature of these embryos.
Tantalizing
clues about the nature of the Ambergris Caye Maya during the Postclassic may also be found at the site of Basil Jones.
L2016 doesn't pursue these valid
clues about the nature of public skepticism6 (and incidentally features significant hypocrisy7), while the claimed «dividing line» is certainly not easy to identify reliably in the generic case.
Not exact matches
But before expressing this belief, Fr Holloway makes a general remark
about the
nature of scientific knowledge which may serve as an introduction to Polanyi's refutation of Scientific Positivism and his proposal that science is Personal Knowledge: «It is most significant that here, as so very often in the discoveries of science, it was not the inductive data which was the real beginning of the breakthrough in knowledge, but a deductive vision glimpsed through scanty data which thrilled and excited the mind... from then on the hunt is up for the
clues and the final proof.»
There may be some
clue here to previously puzzling observations
about processes of
nature which are unrelated to value in the comment that this process of flowing «is not the work of God.
It is this
clue about the relational
nature of life that Origen uses to connect the Delphic admonition with Christian discourse.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory
nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think
about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing
about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a
clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
You are more in tune with their individual needs as you are face to face with the
clues that they give
about their needs so it becomes second
nature to just respond to their needs.
«Quantum foam» — grainy bumps in the fabric of space - time — might explain why light from a distant galaxy arrived four minutes later than expected, offering
clues about the real
nature of gravity
Trying to understand why a particular asymmetry exists can reveal
clues about the profound
nature of reality.
The results, appearing in
Nature Communications, offer potential treatment targets for this rare disease, provide important
clues about bone development, and may lead to insights
about fracture healing and osteoporosis.
We used tools that the cell itself might use, giving us the first
clues about how the process may occur in
nature.»
An international team of astronomers has looked at something very big — a distant galaxy — to study the behavior of things very small — atoms and molecules — to gain vital
clues about the fundamental
nature of our entire Universe.
«The
nature of the energetic source of X-rays we call the corona is mysterious, but now with the ability to see dramatic changes like this we are getting
clues about its size and structure,» said Fiona Harrison, the principal investigator of NuSTAR at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, who was not affiliated with the study.
The achievement is giving them important new
clues about a problem at the frontiers of cosmology — the
nature and origin of the magnetic fields that play an important role in how galaxies develop over time.
So he's naturally not best pleased when, in trying to dig further into his past for
clues about his real
nature, he also has to deal with the arrival of two new potential enemies — Electro and Rhino, played by Paul Giamatti.
The comments come from current Teachers, Teaching Assistants, SEND co-ordinators, heads of house, inclusion managers and Form Group Tutors...: We used this in small groups in our new class every morning for a week, what a great start, everyone is still buzzing... Builds a strong sense of belonging to something special... your class... Encourages differences and similarities to recognised and valued... Hugely improves our efforts at inclusion... The students quickly came out of their shells and are blossoming... Reveals much of the
nature of the students... Gets us buzzing as a group... Encourages participants to take part in their own game and go and find things out from others... brilliant ice breaker game... Helped to resolve a huge problem we had in getting students to gel... Switches the students brains on from the moment go... Helps to break down various barriers... Gives a big boost to developing important life skills... This gives a great insight and a fantastic array of examples,
clues and hints as to the characters of each individual in the group... Helps participants learn some things
about themselves... Helps participants learn some things
about others... Helps you learn
about the participants (you can be a player as well on some occasions)... Makes it easy to develop class rules of fairness and cooperation... Builds a sense of purpose... Creates a sense of community and togetherness... Brilliant, just brilliant... our school is buzzing...
Most people don't have a
clue about the wonder or complexity of
nature or the beautiful balanced ebb and flow of life outside their artifically heated and cooled homes.
Two new features on
Nature Reports Climate Change pay homage to the work of scientists who, over the last few decades, have been tireless in their efforts to extract
clues about the Earth's past climate from air bubbles, isotopes and dust particles trapped in ice.
But again and again I just see the same shit come out of you people «air temps, air temps, air temps» is all you know how to fucking look at, and the actually CO2 and methane levels, you don't have a
clue how much society produces compared to natural causes, right now people make
about 50x as much as
nature puts out.