Sentences with phrase «clues about when»

Now we have a confirmed Canadian release for 2014, which may lead to clues about when it might be released.

We have a great routine — and by routine, I mean, he gives me clues about when he needs what and I try to interpret them.

Instead scientists can gather clues about when we begin to dream by monitoring certain physiological markers while a person is asleep, such as brain waves, muscle tension and eye movements.

Researchers found a way to test ancient teeth for clues about when humans cut nursing short.

It's important to pay attention to your child's daytime behavior and nighttime sleep for clues about when to help them transition.

The button prompts are sometimes hard to pinpoint, giving you little clue about when you're supposed to perform specific actions or what button to even press before it's too late.

While we have no clue about when the launch will happen, Xiaomi will be banking on an easy to set - up, set - top box (STB), which integrates and turns your standard TV into a smart TV.

Not exact matches

The first clue was that I started a list before I left which was titled «things to think about when I'm on vacation».

Upon learning about precession, I realized that while building my business sometimes felt painful and confusing, each small step was taking me somewhere, even when I didn't feel like I had a clue where I was going.

When the BYOD craze started, company officials had no clue about network security, much less the best practices that would be necessary to reduce the risks introduced by employees using their personal computers, smartphones and tablets for company business.

I had no clue about CD laddering, dividend investing or P2P lending until two weeks ago when I started doing my research on where to put my hard earned money.

Over the next few months, when Musk was asked about it, he said that when he had time he might publish an open - source version of this Hyperloop plan for others to work on, and meanwhile he offered more opaque clues as to what his idea was («a cross between a Concorde and a rail gun and an air - hockey table... if they had a three - way and had a baby somehow»), which inspired lots of online speculation, much of it deeply skeptical.

[01:10] Introduction [02:45] James welcomes Tony to the podcast [03:35] Tony's leap year birthday [04:15] Unshakeable delivers the specific facts you need to know [04:45] What James learned from Unshakeable [05:25] Most people panic when the stock market drops [05:45] Getting rid of your fear of investing [06:15] Last January was the worst opening, but it was a correction [06:45] You are losing money when you sell on corrections [06:55] Bear markets come every 5 years on average [07:10] The greatest opportunity for a millennial [07:40] Waiting for corrections to invest [08:05] Warren Buffet's advice for investors [08:55] If you miss the top 10 trading days a year... [09:25] Three different investor scenarios over a 20 year period [10:40] The best trading days come after the worst [11:45] Investing in the current world [12:05] What Clinton and Bush think of the current situation [12:45] The office is far bigger than the occupant [13:35] Information helps reduce fear [14:25] James's story of the billionaire upset over another's wealth [14:45] What money really is [15:05] The story of Adolphe Merkle [16:05] The story of Chuck Feeney [16:55] The importance of the right mindset [17:15] What fuels Tony [19:15] Find something you care about more than yourself [20:25] Make your mission to surround yourself with the right people [21:25] Suffering made Tony hungry for more [23:25] By feeding his mind, Tony found strength [24:15] Great ideas don't interrupt you, you have to pursue them [25:05] Never - ending hunger is what matters [25:25] Richard Branson is the epitome of hunger and drive [25:40] Hunger is the common denominator [26:30] What you can do starting right now [26:55] Success leaves clues [28:10] What it means to take massive action [28:30] Taking action commits you to following through [29:40] If you do nothing you'll learn nothing [30:20] There must be an emotional purpose behind what you're doing [30:40] How does Tony ignite creativity in his own life [32:00] «How is not as important as «why» [32:40] What and why unleash the psyche [33:25] Breaking the habit of focusing on «how» [35:50] Deep Practice [35:10] Your desired outcome will determine your action [36:00] The difference between «what» and «why» [37:00] Learning how to chunk and group [37:40] Don't mistake movement for achievement [38:30] Tony doesn't negotiate with his mind [39:30] Change your thoughts and change your biochemistry [40:00] The bad habit of being stressed [40:40] Beautiful and suffering states [41:50] The most important decision is to live in a beautiful state no matter what [42:40] Consciously decide to take yourself out of suffering [43:40] Focus on appreciation, joy and love [44:30] Step out of suffering and find the solution [45:00] Dealing with mercury poisoning [45:40] Tony's process for stepping out of suffering [46:10] Stop identifying with thoughts — they aren't yours [47:40] Trade your expectations for appreciation [50:00] The key to life — gratitude [51:40] What is freedom for you?

«In any battle, you've got to be clued up about what you're doing,» explains Lindsay, when I catch up with him a week later to talk in more depth, «so I think we need to train churches — church leaders, youth pastors — anyone engaging with youth culture, about what is actually going on... We can't be naïve about this stuff.»

You have demonstrated zero understanding of what it means to be gay and also throw out «health dangers» as though you have some clue about what you are talking about when you are clearly woefully misinformed.

But when a dumb kid says he's an atheist because religion is illogical and God is a fairy tale, he has no clue what he's talking about.

When those who call themselves Christians have no clue themselves about true theology, how would one expect an atheist or an agnostic to agree on it?

When CS Lewis wrote his stories about Narnia, was he speaking only from his imagination, or was he giving clues about how to get into Narnia?

A second clue is something you wrote in a comment to me which I found odd (not the comment where you called me a troll — an ugly character — that's totally understandable) I'm talking about when you wrote: «I wouldn't say my «faith» changes.

So is Christianity really following Jesus or the writers of these gospels... oh and the Hebrew chapters has not clue who and when was it written... my suggestion is to spend sometime to know what you believe and what you want to believe... also if you really like to know about what real Jesus was, please read Quran... more eighty times the name of Jesus is mentioned in this book... where there is a chapter with Jesus» mother name «Mary» chapter 19, there is another chapter name «ale imran'the grand father of Jesus, chapter 3... and then compare what Jesus really was dear brother in mankind...

If we'd had any clue when we agreed to write it, about what that would mean for us going on from 2014 into 2015, I don't know if we would have said yes to writing it...

You people have absolutely no clue what it is you're talking about when you promote your so - called faith.

@fred: when you can't spell «quantum,» it's pretty hard to believe you have a clue what you're blubbering about.

George further theorized that «Eve» was unpredictably receptive, thus forcing «Adam» to think about clues to her behavior that would tell him when she would be.

Get a clue, Jesus is all about Love and respect and helping the poor, giving the shirt off your back to help your fellow man, healing (healthcare)... all I can say is earn your living, if you are rich great, you have been given a blessing to help those who need it... when you die you can't take it with you any way!

This is itself an important clue to the situation many of us face when speaking about the afterlife.

A second clue is something you wrote in a comment to me which I found odd (not the comment where you called me a troll, that's totally understandable) I'm talking about when you wrote: «I wouldn't say my «faith» changes.

When you're hunting your gone all day, walking for miles and interesting animals come home that you have no clue what to do with.The only good thing about this hunting trip was I did not go and the granola bars I made.

I used to make pesto with Parmesan cheese (back when I also didn't have a clue about food photography, apparently), and then I used to make it vegan with no cheesy substance, and now I have taken things to a new level, introducing the vegan basil hemp seed pesto, with the addition of hemp seeds and nutritional yeast — to bring more cheesy nuttiness to the mix while staying vegan.

When we went through that tough financial period, no doubt their friends and fans from other clubs began to mock and ridicule them because they support «losers» without any clue about what has actually transpired at Arsenal (new stadium etc etc).

When we went through that tough financial period, no doubt their friends and fans from other clubs began to mock and ridicule them because they support «losers» without any facking clue about what has actually transpired at Arsenal (new stadium etc etc).

So it's very safe to say you have absolutely no clue about who I am as a person and you might want to keep that in mind when making statements like that.

Obviously you have no clue about football when you give that score line.

Whats the point writing about tactics when we have no clue who will be at the club after january transfer window?

No clue about tactics, no clue about substitutions, no clue about team selection (Cech would have dominated his area and prevented at least one of the headers + he is most experienced keeper trophy winning keeper in the country and would remain calm), no plan B when he realised Carroll is playing.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

LOL... Since when does 90 per cent of passes going sideways or backwards amount to an attacking strategy... Wenger has an 8 million quid banking strategy and that is it... The man has no clue about putting together and coaching a team that can challenge for top footballing trophies and that has been obvious to me for a decade

You can't come here, call me smug with no evidence other than your own projection, say I'm «letting it slide» with, again, no evidence other than your own projection, and then say I'm in denial when you seem to have little to no clue what you're talking about.

How on earth can Arsenals future be bright when the club is owned by a scum parasite who cares only about his personal wealth, is run by a manager 20 years out of date and completely out of touch with all football reality and when we have a board full of amateurs, who lie, don't have a clue about football and are rudderless and diretionless.

«Special» K talked about Dein but does he have a clue what Dein done or how he acted when he was here, did special K ever pay attention politics in football or is he repeating a name he seen real supporters know?

This site has even done an article about when Gazidis said Wenger had no clue about player value... Strange that Gazidis should say that while Dein use to just get who - ever Wenger wanted and that resulted in Arsenal breaking their own record numerous time with Wenger and Dein.

Woods is still 28/1 to win online at Bovada, which is where he stood Sunday night when all we knew is that he would play but had no clue about the state of his ravaged short game.

But Sheffield thinks a new calm is about to prevail in L.A.. His first clue came in January — after an off - season filled with trades and free - agent signings by the Dodgers — when he hosted Johnson at a party in St. Petersburg celebrating Gary's and wife DeLeon's recent marriage.

The thing is, though, when you line up all of those names and think about who Juve is most likely to sign — and I guess we can throw Can out of the mix right now because we have no clue as to where he wants to go right now — we have another question pop into our head: Are Cristante and Pelegrini the kind of midfielders that can truly make Juventus better?

If Jack Wilshere is allowed to leave then it shows that A, Wenger don't have a clue what to do with Jack, B, Wenger is like a football farmer, fatten up the English youngsters then flog em off while signing 2nd rate foreign boys, C, Wenger don't give a monkeys about any players who don't idolise him, Jack is future captain material but Wenger doesn't do captains, which is why when the games going against us we run round like 11 strangers with no leader, I will be glad when Wengers gone and taken his useless back room staff with him,

This question can give clues to when your child feels confident or may lead to surprises for you about a new interest your child is developing.

It can be very exhausting and time consuming to make the right choice for your baby, especially when you don't have a clue about what product will perfectly suit your needs.

Local sling library — When someone first suggested a sling library to me I didn't have a clue what they meant, I was honestly picturing a building full of books about slings (yes I know, idiot).

Can you think of a time when you didn't have a clue about what you were doing but you still found a way and were proud as heck that you and baby were surviving?

Potty training can be a real bitch, especially when you're just trying to enjoy your damn coffee and your little one lets you know that he needs to use the potty but you can tell that he's clued you in about five minutes after the fact.