Sentences with phrase «clues about which»

While Qualcomm gives no clues about which manufacturer the device belongs to, it is pretty obvious from the image, that it will be LG who will take the stage.

A recent study has examined whether dogs» responses to cat - related sights, sounds and smells provide clues about which dogs are cat - friendly.

Ultimately, the microarray study could provide clues about which genes are responsible for the disease and lead to the development of blood tests for early detection and possible new treatments for DCM.

A chest X-rays can display the heart's shape and size, and, in many cases, will give us clues about which section of the heart is malfunctioning.

The new scores will give us more clues about which view is right.

Furthermore, the research offers clues about which genes to avoid and which to target in other disease - causing bacteria.

Would you like to know if your DNA held any clues about which sports you might be best at?

Now a new study from the Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania found that shifting use of anti-PD-1 drugs to before surgery may provide clues about which patients will benefit and which may be at increased risk for recurrence.

«Understanding the mixing and transport processes that occur around Sun - like stars could give us clues about which of their surrounding planets might have conditions similar to our own.»

He has been able to piggyback on previous work on the development of the chick embryo: When researchers interested in some process use a stain to show gene activity, the stain affects the whole embryo, providing clues about which genes are active in tail growth.

The next several months should provide clues about which of these two positions will prevail in Canada's upcoming electoral reform debate.

But based on the kind of gatherings Christ regularly attended, we can get clues about which gathering He would attend if He lived in our town.

In this column I'll describe an early warning sign to watch for that will give us a clue about which way this important new field is headed.

Wags, do you have a clue about which ethnic group Solzhenitsyn was writing about not being Russians?

While we have no clue about which countries will have access to the service, we do know that the same goes live and official from the 29th of July after Windows 10 goes live.

Not exact matches

The first clue was that I started a list before I left which was titled «things to think about when I'm on vacation».

The MBTI system begins with a test in which participants respond to questions that provide clues about their basic outlook or personal preferences.

First off, you can pick up some clues about your sommelier by the type of pin they are wearing on their jacket lapel - which indicates their level of training.

While it doesn't tell us anything about the aftermath of «Infinity War,» there are some clues hinting at a new hero and more about the Quantum Realm which will almost definitely come into play in next year's superhero sequel.

Over the next few months, when Musk was asked about it, he said that when he had time he might publish an open - source version of this Hyperloop plan for others to work on, and meanwhile he offered more opaque clues as to what his idea was («a cross between a Concorde and a rail gun and an air - hockey table... if they had a three - way and had a baby somehow»), which inspired lots of online speculation, much of it deeply skeptical.

The guest doesn't seem to have a clue about what he is talking and what I love about it is how arrogant the dude is about the business that he owns and the work that he does (which he makes it sound more important than feeding the hungry children of Africa or something).

Then, at nine: 45 a.m., Wall Street will observe for the Chicago PMI, which might give some clues about what the ISM Index will say tomorrow.

Second, you obviously have no clue about what the Catholic Church teaches or does, except for that which you disagree with based in GayNN articles.

That is, Druckenmiller can clue you to the shocking truth about your self - interest, which to defend you will need to vote Republican at all state and national levels of government, at least until the population of the endangered species Fiscally Conservative Democrat rebounds sufficiently.

But before expressing this belief, Fr Holloway makes a general remark about the nature of scientific knowledge which may serve as an introduction to Polanyi's refutation of Scientific Positivism and his proposal that science is Personal Knowledge: «It is most significant that here, as so very often in the discoveries of science, it was not the inductive data which was the real beginning of the breakthrough in knowledge, but a deductive vision glimpsed through scanty data which thrilled and excited the mind... from then on the hunt is up for the clues and the final proof.»

The video, which features a channel - flipping montage of increasingly ominous clips, doesn't reveal too much about the plot, but it may contain a few clues.

There are two wonderful things that give me a positive wow factor every day — the increasing number of people I discover doing fantastically brilliant stuff, quietly and without fuss, living out the Gospel of Christ in gentle, caring, loving ways, most of which the church institution hasn't got a clue about because it's too dam busy running itself.

There may be some clue here to previously puzzling observations about processes of nature which are unrelated to value in the comment that this process of flowing «is not the work of God.

Of course, I've never pastored a church, so I may not have a clue what I'm taking about (which has never stopped me from expressing an opinion).

Might what Lewis said about his space travel stories give us any clues about his fantasy writing in general: «No merely physical strangeness or merely spatial distance will realize the idea of otherness which is what we are always trying to grasp in a story about voyaging through space: you must go into another dimension.»

A second clue is something you wrote in a comment to me which I found odd (not the comment where you called me a troll — an ugly character — that's totally understandable) I'm talking about when you wrote: «I wouldn't say my «faith» changes.

The suggestion may point us to a clue about certain traits in human personality which are necessary conditions of creativity.

These verses just prove that the person who wrote the bible had no clue about science, which is no surprise being the bible was written 2000 years ago.

The very fact of our noticing and being bothered about chance occurrences is a clue to the fact of a hierarchical universe in which causal paths involving distinct levels at times cross each other to our dismay or delight.

Suffice it to say that the conceptuality which I accept — and accept because it seems to do justice to deep analysis of human experience and observation, as well as to the knowledge we now have of the way «things go» in the world — lays stress on the dynamic «event» character of that world; on the inter-relationships which exist in what is a societal universe, on the inadequacy of «substance» thinking to describe such a universe of «becoming» and «belonging», on the place of decisions in freedom by the creatures with the consequences which such decisions bring about, and on the central importance of persuasion rather than coercive force as a clue to the «going» of things in that universe.

A second clue is something you wrote in a comment to me which I found odd (not the comment where you called me a troll, that's totally understandable) I'm talking about when you wrote: «I wouldn't say my «faith» changes.

She had no clue what I was talking about which I thought was funny since she is from Austria and German is her native language.

It says a lot about my emotional maturity and the level at which I was able to connect with my own experiences that I had literally no clue as to what I would write.

There is just something about a toasted pecan that feels like home — which should have been my first clue that this was our state tree, derp!

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I have written before here about the shocking statement that the board have no clue unless Wenger has an idea and if not they wait for him to come with a plan (which they will back up).

What worries me is that we have a board which is having absolutely no clue about football.

Telling me players are not to blame is absolutely rubbish, they are to blame, yes Monaco mission was to relax and repell Arsenal and if possible shut them down completely, this gam was ours to take, First the pressure was on Monaco, they didn't know how to go about it, whether to defend their 3 - 1 advantage or press us, we had more than enough clear cut chances but as usual we were clueless in front of goal, we tried to open them apart which is impossible, Carzolla and Alexis played as if we lead 15 - 0, holding balls, try to dribble every time they have the ball and and reduce the pace and any chance of other to get through, losing balls carelessly, poor crosses is now our style, it doesn't threatened even Charlton athletic coz everyone now knows our crosses is poorly delivered and our attackers also don't have a clue how to do it even if one get through it will be wasted, this game should have been won by range attempts which was only tried once by ÖZIL and was blocked.

Woods is still 28/1 to win online at Bovada, which is where he stood Sunday night when all we knew is that he would play but had no clue about the state of his ravaged short game.

He doesn't have a clue about football, more about finance, which says it all as far as Kroenke is concerned.

Also, re him knowing about SAF retiring months ago - bullshit, even SAF's staff did not know, not everyone at the Club knew, Sir Bobby did not know, Maureen only knew after SAF told everyone, which was a month ago, he should stop trying to be too clever, his comments after SAF announced retirement and before show he had no clue, he know SAF might retire, he wanted the job, he pitched for it and lost.

If Jack Wilshere is allowed to leave then it shows that A, Wenger don't have a clue what to do with Jack, B, Wenger is like a football farmer, fatten up the English youngsters then flog em off while signing 2nd rate foreign boys, C, Wenger don't give a monkeys about any players who don't idolise him, Jack is future captain material but Wenger doesn't do captains, which is why when the games going against us we run round like 11 strangers with no leader, I will be glad when Wengers gone and taken his useless back room staff with him,

Brighton looked like they had little clue of how to even start combatting Hazard, about which they shouldn't necessarily be embarrassed.

Even in the «no - clue - about - babies - happy - pregnancy - bubble» state in which we booked our holiday, we did think carefully about where we wanted to visit.

He's starting Visual Basic now, something which I have no clue about!