Sentences with phrase «clues about why»

Longitudinal research exposes the prevalence of harassment and reveals clues about why it persists.

Macmillan admitted in its «Epilogue» to Pronoun users that it had failed to meet the challenges of the self - publishing business but Bonnier's adieu doesn't give any clues about why it's binning off Type & Tell.

One of the reasons why they are checking out the house is to find clues about why Michael went crazy.

I then followed the rules of Egg Fasting without having many clues about why it might work.

offers clues about why eating sometimes makes you tired.

Even if there is no hope for life there, and little chance that humans will step on its sizzling surface, Venus is still a fascinating world whose geology may offer clues about why two similar planets developed in startlingly different ways.

Researchers at University of California, San Diego School of Medicine have induced this all - too - common human experience — or a close version of it — permanently in rats and from what is observed perhaps derive clues about why strokes and Alzheimer's disease can destroy a person's sense of direction.

Now, the odd behavior of the Bs meson could be giving us some clues about why matter won out over antimatter.

They give some clues about why these diseases occur, but more detailed maps, such as this, will pinpoint where the problems lie — providing precise targets for therapies.

Almost immediately after Peter makes his confession in Matthew 16 about the identity of Jesus, Peter reveals that he doesn't have a clue about why Jesus came to be the Messiah.

Jesus doesn't give us a clue about why this happens.

As you search through Jigsaw's maze you will find clue about why you are there as well as «relics» of past victims.

The «hints» dropped by clients who leave no hint whatsoever, simply walking out the door, never to return, never to offer even the first clue about why they don't answer your calls or emails.

Not exact matches

[01:10] Introduction [02:45] James welcomes Tony to the podcast [03:35] Tony's leap year birthday [04:15] Unshakeable delivers the specific facts you need to know [04:45] What James learned from Unshakeable [05:25] Most people panic when the stock market drops [05:45] Getting rid of your fear of investing [06:15] Last January was the worst opening, but it was a correction [06:45] You are losing money when you sell on corrections [06:55] Bear markets come every 5 years on average [07:10] The greatest opportunity for a millennial [07:40] Waiting for corrections to invest [08:05] Warren Buffet's advice for investors [08:55] If you miss the top 10 trading days a year... [09:25] Three different investor scenarios over a 20 year period [10:40] The best trading days come after the worst [11:45] Investing in the current world [12:05] What Clinton and Bush think of the current situation [12:45] The office is far bigger than the occupant [13:35] Information helps reduce fear [14:25] James's story of the billionaire upset over another's wealth [14:45] What money really is [15:05] The story of Adolphe Merkle [16:05] The story of Chuck Feeney [16:55] The importance of the right mindset [17:15] What fuels Tony [19:15] Find something you care about more than yourself [20:25] Make your mission to surround yourself with the right people [21:25] Suffering made Tony hungry for more [23:25] By feeding his mind, Tony found strength [24:15] Great ideas don't interrupt you, you have to pursue them [25:05] Never - ending hunger is what matters [25:25] Richard Branson is the epitome of hunger and drive [25:40] Hunger is the common denominator [26:30] What you can do starting right now [26:55] Success leaves clues [28:10] What it means to take massive action [28:30] Taking action commits you to following through [29:40] If you do nothing you'll learn nothing [30:20] There must be an emotional purpose behind what you're doing [30:40] How does Tony ignite creativity in his own life [32:00] «How is not as important as «why» [32:40] What and why unleash the psyche [33:25] Breaking the habit of focusing on «how» [35:50] Deep Practice [35:10] Your desired outcome will determine your action [36:00] The difference between «what» and «why» [37:00] Learning how to chunk and group [37:40] Don't mistake movement for achievement [38:30] Tony doesn't negotiate with his mind [39:30] Change your thoughts and change your biochemistry [40:00] The bad habit of being stressed [40:40] Beautiful and suffering states [41:50] The most important decision is to live in a beautiful state no matter what [42:40] Consciously decide to take yourself out of suffering [43:40] Focus on appreciation, joy and love [44:30] Step out of suffering and find the solution [45:00] Dealing with mercury poisoning [45:40] Tony's process for stepping out of suffering [46:10] Stop identifying with thoughts — they aren't yours [47:40] Trade your expectations for appreciation [50:00] The key to life — gratitude [51:40] What is freedom for you?

A perfect example of why so many so - called (and I DO MEAN so - called) «christians» (as opposed to Christians) don't have a clue about what they believe or why.

Boston, why wasn't it in genesis, they wouldn't have had a clue about what inflation or big bang is.

For over a year, He has been gaining hundreds of followers, but He knows that most of them have not clue about who He really is, or why He truly came.

There's a ton of stuff that we have no clue about in this universe that can not be explained empirically — especially why bad things happen to good people.

why must you comment on something you have absolutely no clue about?

The question is why it makes our economy global, what it does to our present perceptions, and how the sort of rationality that is intrinsic to the Internet can give us clues about the shaping of our rationality today.

All these comments go to show that we are very far away from what is suppose to SEPERATION OF CHURCH AND STATE... all you religious zealots get a clue... if your god is so powerful why doesn't he put your man in office... I'll tell you... he could care less about the piddly human contest to rule the world... really, please, use some logic in determination of who is best for this country...

In Matthew 13:10 - 15, He has just finished telling a parable, and his disciples had no clue what he was talking about, and so they come to him — out of frustration I'm sure — and say, «Why do you speak to the people in parables?»

Why a Chef wouldn't get the clue about eating right I don't totally understanding... It's a beautiful looking soup.

Honestly... no clue why but the more I thought about it the more I was determined to make it.

Whether by design or not Wenger has in theory «bosses» who neither have a clue why nor seemingly care about our lack of a real challenge for the league and champions league over the last decade.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Just a nice, quiet, radically fast young man with no interest in making social statements and no clue as to why anyone — all the reporters who peppered him with questions about race after he won the gold medal, all the people roaming websites, even a writer from SPORTS ILLUSTRATED — would make color an issue.

This site is called «Just Arsenal», the clue is in the name, so why do writers spend so much time writing about other clubs?

If Jack Wilshere is allowed to leave then it shows that A, Wenger don't have a clue what to do with Jack, B, Wenger is like a football farmer, fatten up the English youngsters then flog em off while signing 2nd rate foreign boys, C, Wenger don't give a monkeys about any players who don't idolise him, Jack is future captain material but Wenger doesn't do captains, which is why when the games going against us we run round like 11 strangers with no leader, I will be glad when Wengers gone and taken his useless back room staff with him,

My premise is that no program or school is perfect, but that each successful intervention contains some clues about how and why it works that can inform the rest of the field.

Attorney Dirk Vandever told the newspaper that Belcher's family hopes tests will provide a clue as to why the four - year veteran of the Kansas City Chiefs shot his longtime girlfriend to death then killed himself about a year ago.

I guess that's why you complain about a problem that you are sure can be solved without having a clue as to the solution.

He had better jokes, an old line about why he asks the questions («the clue's in the title») and won on the substance.

To save any further head - scratching about why this moniker suddenly reappeared, Nelson helpfully offers a clue, for later in the piece he reveals that he has been having off - the - record chats with supporters of David Miliband, he writes» As one of his supporters told me...»

«Quantum foam» — grainy bumps in the fabric of space - time — might explain why light from a distant galaxy arrived four minutes later than expected, offering clues about the real nature of gravity

Trying to understand why a particular asymmetry exists can reveal clues about the profound nature of reality.

«My supervisor fired me after 3 months,» a student of a technical university says, continuing, «I really do not have a clue about the reason why.

«Ever since the lakes and seas were discovered, we've been wondering why they're concentrated at high northern latitudes,» said Elizabeth (Zibi) Turtle, a Cassini imaging team associate based at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Md. «So, seeing that there's something special about the surface in this region is a big clue to help narrow down the possible explanations.»

For now, they don't have a clue about the virus's origins or why it's suddenly causing an outbreak; in order to speed up the process, they want to share the virus and protocols for detecting it with anyone interested in studying the disease or developing diagnostic tools and vaccines.

«The study of this weakly interacting particle could unlock clues to big questions about the universe such as «Why do we exist?

If researchers can figure out why coffee, or possibly caffeine, is tied to MS, Kingwell said, that could give clues about the underlying causes of the disease or possibly lead to new treatments.

No clue why it took so long for that combo to come about.

Here are some clues and thoughts that might surprise you about why power is so damn sexy.

You may think about why i use that name, cz only the ones who i let them can know me, only the ones who is smart enough to track the clues can find me and for those who are interested in to know me more, the key i am hol..

Artistically, it makes sense, since everyone is walking around in the dark metaphorically with no clues about how or why the plague started, and no clue about the best way to survive.

Was it a classic case of mixed - grouping in action or was it, as I found out later (why do kids wait literally years to clue you into a problem it would have been nice to know about it in the moment?)

Young Alicia wonders why the two white women have come to her Peruvian village since they hoard their liquor, value work over partying, and don't have a clue about marriage or sex.

For some unknown reason pocket articles are warning me about 7 unread «books» by certain author who I do not know because I didn't pay attention to a name of the author of article... I have no clue why the pocket articles now referred as books with the new software, it is confusing occasionally.

Research firms that have taken apart Motorola Mobility Holdings Inc.'s Xoom tablet computer uncovered some additional clues about its features and why it costs more to build than Apple Inc.'s hit iPad.

To be plain: if you have only half a clue about what you're invested in, and why, you have much less than half a chance of succeeding.