Their objections to agw all lack rationality, because their real underlying objections are driven by vested interests and politics.So
they clutch at any argument no matter how superfical and stupid like CO2 is plantfood, climate changed before, its a liberal conspiracy, data is fake and endless assorted nonsense.
Not exact matches
If by «strongest» you mean the
argument from whose
clutches those bound by it find it most difficult to escape, it is not a scriptural
argument at all.
He is so desparately
clutching at straws that he is incable of maintaining a consistent
argument.
(5) Most if not all of the
arguments in favour of ABS that lie outside those first four points are little more than
clutching at straws by people incapable of resiling from a stance they have taken publically, not matter how increasing foolish the stance is (get rid of witnesses and affidavits for wills).