Sentences with phrase «coal burning were»

Teng estimates there would be a further cost of 160 yuan per tonne, on top of the 260 yuan calculated in the study, if the long - term social impact of climate change from coal burning were considered.

The potential political costs of capping carbon dioxide from coal burning were on full display in the final hours of the presidential campaign.

Of course it matters that the levels of coal burning were lower globally before 1940.

This is another reason why the effects of aerosols from coal burning were overwhelmed in this period.

It doesn't matter if levels of coal burning were comparatively small prior to 1940.

By examining rates of mortality and respiratory - related illnesses on both sides of the river, Greenstone's team identified a difference: life expectancies are lower and pollution concentrations are higher north of the Huai, where coal burning was widespread.

In Krakow, Poland, where the study took place, as in many areas worldwide, coal burning is an important air pollution source.

After all, coal burning is responsible for 40 percent of the 30 billion metric tons of CO2 emitted by human activity every year.

It is cheap because the environmental damage caused by coal burning isn't factored into the price.

The report quotes public health experts who express concerns that carbon emissions associated with coal use will contribute to climate change and add to future public health problems - on top of the serious consequences of coal burning we are already seeing today.

The trajectories for emissions of carbon dioxide as the world's industrial and industrializing countries boost coal burning are clearly going to be tough to turn around, whether through caps on emissions or efforts to improve non-polluting energy technologies.

[Andy Revkin — The price differential between renewable energy sources and coal burning is shifting, but a 10 - year transformation is hard to foresee given the incredibly small base from which solar is growing (see the solar link in the previous annotation) and the long timeline for boosting geothermal generation, among other issues.

Coal burning is also a major emitter of carcinogens and mercury, a potent neurotoxin.

Take the worst thing that anybody could possibly do, ever, and coal burning is just as bad» or if it's a calculated method of seeking attention.

Acid gas, soot, and dust emissions from coal burning are, along with diesel engines, the biggest contributors to microscopic particulate pollution that penetrates deep into the lungs and the bloodstream.

There are many sources of CO2, some, like cattle - raising, or coal burning are just as damaging as oil or more so.

While Australia's Abbott Government is increasing its support for coal in hopes of exporting more and more, the rest of the world is seeing that the end of coal burning is inevitable if we are not to destroy our environment.

This kind of rampant coal burning is totally irresponsible.

It is the amount of coal burned is what determines ghg emissions.

«Residential coal burning R: What is your suggestion on coal burning other than coal - fired power plants?

Digging a bit deeper we find that a worrisome high level of coal burning is slated to remain in place at least over the next decade.

(08/18/2008) Coal burning is contaminating the Arctic, and may be affecting human health and polar ecosystems, warn scientists writing in the online early edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

U.S. emissions have been falling for more than half a decade, as coal burning is replaced by fracked natural gas and wind power.

Greenhouse gas emissions from coal burning are the leading contributor to global warming, our generation's greatest environmental challenge.

(2) Coal burning is de-facto Volcanoes the NOX emissions via the Sun's radiation becomes life sustain Nitrogen (3) Relative low cost Canadian Technology captures the real serious nasty emissions, CO2 is part of the essential life cycles.

Coal burning is often a lot dirtier than diesels and on a lot bigger scale.

On average, American coal plants are only 37.4 percent efficient, meaning that nearly two - thirds of the coal burned is not converted to electricity.

And last time I checked, coal burning was still the biggest cause of pollution and largest contributor to greenhouse gas emissions in the world.

Living near a coal - fired power station would give you 100 to 300 times more radiation exposure than living next to a nuclear power plant, and even that is trivial and not the reason coal burning is damaging to your health.

Not exact matches

The coal destined for Fraser Surrey Docks, however, will be thermal coal, to be burned in power plants to generate electricity.

The really compelling argument for disallowing the coal supply chain through Fraser Surrey Docks is that it effectively undoes that achievement in emissions reduction if the same hydrocarbons end up being burned and vented into the atmosphere in China, where if anything environmental protections are more lax.

We found that the Southeast and the Ohio Valley, where most of the coal is burned, would capture the lion's share of these benefits.

The federal emissions standard is estimated to reduce carbon pollution equivalent to 134 coal power plants burning annually and save drivers $ 1,650 per vehicle through fuel savings according to the coalition that includes Connecticut, Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Washington.

The sea levels are rising and we're burning coal to make buildings uncomfortably cold in 90 - degree weather

So we asked in our research: What would happen if current low natural gas prices or pollution control policies caused all US coal - burning power plants to be replaced by natural gas generators?

Most of the senators who signed are from states that depend on the continued burning of coal, oil and gas.

Air pollutants are the result of impurities in coal that, once burned, can become air - or water - borne hazards, including soot, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and mercury, all of which are regulated in the U.S..

Cleaner burning natural gas has been replacing aging coal power plants in droves over the past several years thanks to both economics and environmental reasons.

Jeff Brooks, a spokesman for the company, contends water quality near the coal - burning plant is good and local agriculture and wildlife weren't affected by the spill.

So, it's not so much about the act of walking over burning hot coals, but about having people face and overcome something in spite of fear.

Let's not forget that when Australia burns or sells coal it is contributing to this global problem as well.

But for those who oppose fracking, there is this: Burning the natural gas produced by fracking may be much better for the environment and public health, over the long run, than burninBurning the natural gas produced by fracking may be much better for the environment and public health, over the long run, than burningburning coal.

But he added that there have been «terrific» innovations in making burning coal cleaner, and more could come.

While Peabody was only down about 10 % at the end of May 2014, the stock got crushed as the government proposed to reduce carbon emissions (stemming from fossil fuels like coal), which would burn up even more of Peabody's bottom line.

America's biggest coal burning plant is in striking distance of my air, actually, near Macon, Georgia.

And it could mean a future viable source of energy that emits no pollution or radioactivity, burns no fossil fuels, and could be no more expensive to run than conventional coal or electric power plants.

Base load power, the residual power that has to be generated day - in, day - out, came primarily from burning coal, typically in a plant located right at a mine site owned by the power company.

A majority of economists, business and energy analysts instead agree that coal's demise is due to a triple whammy: competition from much cheaper and cleaner - burning natural gas, proliferated by fracking technology; growth in the solar and wind energy production; and tougher environmental regulations.

Meanwhile, Bechtel is doing a brisk business in the U.S. building the gas - fired power plants that are rapidly replacing costly coal - burning dinosaurs.

He has long criticized the Obama administration's Environmental Protection Agency, saying that its proposals to tighten emission standards on coal - burning power plants are killing American jobs.