Waste can be further minimised through the use of high efficiency
coal combustion technologies.
Not exact matches
Until advanced
coal -
combustion technologies become widely available that allow CO2 to be captured and stored safely underground, the shift to
coal is bad news for climate change because
coal plants usually emit about twice the CO2 per kilowatt - hour of electricity that gas plants do.
EnBW participates in the project to further reduce CO2 emission of
coal combustion as a bridge
technology.
Vattenfall, a Swedish firm, is backing a
technology called oxyfuel
combustion, which burns
coal in a nitrogen - free atmosphere.
The
technology can remove about 90 to 99.9 % pollutants from
coal combustion.
Other programs that provide economic support for
coal include federal and state tax breaks, the Rural Utilities Service loan guarantee program, research on new
combustion technologies by the Department of Energy, and the Department of the Interior's
coal leasing program.
But there's a new
coal - based power generation
technology, Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle, or IGCC, which allows CCS systems in new plants to more efficiently capture and store CO2 because the CO2 can be removed before
combustion.
A number of
technologies are used to limit the release of trace elements including
coal washing, particulate control devices, fluidised bed
combustion, activated carbon injection and FGDs.
CyClean
technology is an additive that is added to
coal prior to
combustion which the company states reduces mercury and nitrogen oxide emissions.
Zero - emission
technology most typically involved the vision of
coal gasification, in which pollutants would be separated out of the emissions stream prior to
combustion, together with carbon capture and sequestration, in which carbon dioxide would be liquified and stored permanently underground.
The interest in natural gas
combustion as a potential solution to climate change has been gaining because US ghg emissions have fallen somewhat as natural gas from hydraulic fracturing
technologies has been rapidly replacing
coal in electricity sector generation.
The review also notes that
coal combustion remains the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions and local air pollution in the Czech Republic and highlighted the benefits of retrofitting existing
coal - fired power plants with cost - effective emissions controls, and replacement of ageing plants with high - efficiency
technology.
Big
Coal says that capturing and storing CO2 from these new coal plants is a slam - dunk technology — but one that's not quite ready for prime time yet (capturing CO2 from existing combustion coal plants, while possible, is expensive and cuts the electricity output of the plant by as much as 30 perce
Coal says that capturing and storing CO2 from these new
coal plants is a slam - dunk technology — but one that's not quite ready for prime time yet (capturing CO2 from existing combustion coal plants, while possible, is expensive and cuts the electricity output of the plant by as much as 30 perce
coal plants is a slam - dunk
technology — but one that's not quite ready for prime time yet (capturing CO2 from existing
combustion coal plants, while possible, is expensive and cuts the electricity output of the plant by as much as 30 perce
coal plants, while possible, is expensive and cuts the electricity output of the plant by as much as 30 percent).
Why can't we say to
coal burning utilities that we're happy to pay for their power, as long as they invest in
technologies to keep the products of
combustion from destroying the atmosphere?