As with fights under way over the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada, and plans to build
coal export terminals on U.S. coastlines, the new fossil fuel abundance is touching off a backlash among those alarmed by the consequences for climate change.
For example, companies have been seeking permission to build
coal export terminals on the Pacific coast for several years.
Last week's denial of Ambre Energy's permit for its proposed
coal export terminal on the Columbia River demostrates the real power of local communities to stop coal exports in their tracks.
advising the Stage 1 customers (which includes Glencore, Aquila, Yancoal and Wesfarmers) of the Wiggins Island
Coal Export Terminal on their rail access, which has included developing and advising on underwriting arrangements for a $ 910m expansion of the rail infrastructure.
Not exact matches
The company owns an open cut mine at Acland
on the Darling Downs in Queensland and the Queensland Bulk Handling
coal export terminal in Brisbane.
Just as Nebraska doesn't want the Keystone XL pipeline running through its backyard, coastal states such as Washington and Oregon don't want to see an endless string of
coal trains hauling millions of tons of
coal to
export terminals on the Pacific.
This round of public comment
on the Shoreline Substantial Development and Conditional Use Permit for Millennium's proposed
coal export terminal in Longview is our final chance to tell decision - makers that religious communities want sustainable and healthy growth for our state — not polluting and dangerous fossil fuel projects.
For years, people of faith around Washington and across the country have spoken out against the proposal to construct the nation's largest
coal export terminal in Longview, Washington
on the Columbia River.
On July 17, 2012, Peabody Energy announced that, under new agreements with Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, it would gain additional
coal export capacity from Kinder Morgan's Deepwater
Terminal and Houston Bulk
Terminal in Texas, as well as increased access to the International Marine
Terminal at Myrtle Grove, Louisiana, south of New Orleans.
On February 28, 2011, Seattle - based SSA Marine announced it had entered into an agreement with Peabody Energy to
export up to 24 million metric tons of
coal per year through the proposed
terminal.
Platts editors provide an update
on four remaining proposed
coal export terminals planned for the Pacific Northwest following the announcement that a second project had been abandoned.
We have successfully blocked every proposal to build
coal export infrastructure in the Pacific Northwest, save for one: a proposed
terminal in Longview, Washington, that is
on its last legs after it was denied certification by the state's Department of Ecology.
On May 29, 2012 the Seattle City Council unanimously passed a resolution opposing the development of
coal -
export terminals in Washington state after raising concerns about increased train traffic and potential harm to health and the environment.
According to internal Millennium Bulk
Terminals e-mails disclosed
on Feb. 24, 2011, the company hopes to
export 80 million tons of
coal through its proposed west of Longview
terminal, nearly 15 times more than the company originally stated in its application for county permit.
On March 1, 2011, Seattle - based SSA Marine announced it had entered into an agreement with St. Louis - based Peabody Energy to
export up to 24 million metric tons of
coal per year through the Gateway Pacific
Terminal.
The Port of Portland said it doesn't have the space for
coal exports in the short - term, but its consultants cited
coal as a potential long - term market if it adds
terminals on West Hayden Island.
According to Gateway Pacific
Terminal's website the company plans
on providing a «highly efficient portal for American producers to
export dry bulk commodities such as grain, potash and
coal to Asian markets.»
In addition, fossil fuel
exports can be controlled indirectly through local decisions
on whether to permit
coal, liquefied natural gas or oil
export terminals, among other measures.
Coal is also stored on - site at mines and coal export terminals, and roughly 67 percent of it is delivered by train, typically in uncovered freight c
Coal is also stored
on - site at mines and
coal export terminals, and roughly 67 percent of it is delivered by train, typically in uncovered freight c
coal export terminals, and roughly 67 percent of it is delivered by train, typically in uncovered freight cars.
They give versions of Vice President Gore's slideshow all around the world, and drive change in powerful ways, like stopping the construction of a
coal export terminal or addressing the impacts of the crisis
on poor rural communities.
Ambre Energy, an Australian company that is pushing the Morrow Pacific and Millenium Bulk
coal export terminal proposals in the Pacific Northwest, touts
on its website that its Decker mine, which is publicly owned
coal, is, «Geographically well - positioned for Asian market via
export through the Pacific Northwest.»
State agencies in Washington and Montana should similarly reject permits for massive proposed rail and
coal export terminal projects — the market continues to speak
on that front.
Dirty energy lobbyists, including those of Chevron, could effectively use hypothetical arguments of TTIP illegality to chill government action
on both sides of the Atlantic to curtail hydraulic «fracking» for natural gas, deny permits for liquefied natural gas
export terminals, close
coal - fired power plants, and prohibit new
coal mining, oil drilling, and oil / gas pipeline operations, among others.
The
coal industry's efforts to
export huge amounts of taxpayer - owned
coal from Montana and Wyoming to Asia has generated unprecedented opposition in the Pacific Northwest - tens of thousands of people have rallied, attended public hearings, and called
on their elected officials to oppose
coal export terminals that would disrupt and pollute communities and pose one of the biggest threats to the climate of any fossil fuel project in the world.
Denis Horgan, Vice President of Westshore
Terminal at Roberts Bank in Delta — the largest
coal export facility
on the Pacific coast — said the $ 230 million project is more about «staying efficient,» and carefully used the words «stockpile expansion.»
Westshore
coal export terminal at Roberts Bank, in Delta, is the largest
export facility
on the Pacific coast and there are plans to make it larger.