New natural gas might run
coal out of some regions slightly faster than otherwise, but overall renewables would deploy faster with a near - universal rule of no new natural gas plants.
Not exact matches
The IEA expects that
coal demand will increase in every
region of the world except in the United States, where
coal is being pushed
out by natural gas.
While remote
regions of Russia and Canada have the greatest theoretical potential, the Harvard study pointed
out that there are real gains to be made in high - emission nations, especially China, which has been rapidly constructing
coal plants.
It also aligns with the assessment
of clean energy and environmental groups, natural gas trade groups and utilities that have invested in more natural gas generation, and the majority
of energy regulators and economists, who have fought FirstEnergy's and the Trump administration's attempts to bail
out coal and nuclear interests, largely in the PJM
region.
Cheaper natural gas has pushed
out older, less - efficient
coal and oil generation; however, the
region's increasing overreliance on natural gas will provide few additional emissions benefits and increases risks
of price volatility or supply disruption.
In addition, the regional
coal - cap policy will continue to squeeze
coal out of the energy mix, especially in the haze - intensive
regions in the north.
The Appalachian
region has seen a steady decline in
coal employment due a mixture
of increased automation, cheaper
coal from the Powder River Basin
out west, tougher federal environmental regulations and the rise
of natural gas and renewables.
Somewhat counterintuitively, most
coal out of Baltimore — almost double the port's European volume — is destined for Asia, the world's largest
coal consuming
region.
Both yield a phase -
out of coal by 2030, but the date each specific plant goes offline differs significantly between the two approaches, with different potential impacts on
regions within a given country.