Environmental groups also say the bill could set off a boom in the construction of new
coal plants because of provisions that would restrict legal efforts to block such projects.
But in the US this decrease occurred not through government intervention but through market - based substitution of natural gas - fired plants for
coal plants because of increased use of fracking and other new techniques in finding additional natural gas.
Shutting down
coal plants because of their appalling toxic pollution is just as desirable as shutting them down because of their damaging GHG emissions.
Under the previous president, Barack Obama, the U.S. used environmental rules to encourage the closing or costly upgrade of
coal plants because burning the fuel emits almost twice as much carbon dioxide as natural gas and 28 percent more pollutants than heating oil.
Environmental groups, both national and local, are opposing
coal plants because they are the primary driver of climate change.
India is building
coal plants because for them the marginal current premium for solar is huge in their economy.
An early turning point in the coal war came in June 2007, when Florida's Public Service Commission refused to license a huge $ 5.7 - billion, 1,960 - megawatt
coal plant because the utility proposing it could not prove that building the plant would be cheaper than investing in conservation, efficiency, or renewable energy.
In May, Florida's Public Service Commission refused to license a huge $ 5.7 - billion, 1,960 - megawatt
coal plant because the utility could not prove that building the plant would be cheaper than investing in conservation, efficiency, and renewable energy sources.
Not exact matches
Electric utilities have been replacing
coal plants with gas - fired facilities
because they are more efficient and less expensive to operate.
Coal and nuclear generators would be uniquely suited
because, unlike gas
plants, they aren't fed by pipelines.
The natural gas
plants are necessary partly
because of expected load growth, partly
because of the intermittent nature of solar power and partly
because of the planned retirement of around 3,000 megawatts of generation powered by less efficient
coal and oil
plants, he said.
Environmentalists and health workers in favor of the CPP will emphasize how the plan would lead to billions of dollars in savings on hospital bills
because it also would slash emissions from
coal plants.
He says the pension fund is also shifting away from investments like
coal and he's not enthused about nuclear
because as a resident of Long Island, electric customers are still paying for a nuclear
plant which never opened.
He said that from the 1970s into the 1990s regulation of smokestacks focused largely on the stench and opacity of the plumes
because of concerns about
coal - fired
plants and steel mills, and less attention was paid to the chemical
plants.
The Cayuga
coal - burning
plant outside Ithaca may close and the R.E. Ginna facility in Western New York is being subsidized by ratepayers for another few years
because it is needed to maintain the state's electrical grid reliability.
Hartz said that in addition to new jobs, the town's economy is cleaner now
because of the closing of Huntley, a
coal - fired power
plant that had been one of Erie County's biggest polluters.
Combination of economic trends and policies Still, for now an array of Obama administration actions and economic trends are conspiring to cut emissions, according to EIA: Americans are using less oil
because of high gasoline prices; carmakers are complying with federal fuel economy standards; electricity companies are becoming more efficient; state renewable energy rules are ushering wind and solar energy onto the power grids; gas prices are competitive with
coal; and federal air quality regulations are closing the dirtiest power
plants.
In fact, much of the overall decrease in energy consumption can be traced to the shift from
coal to gas,
because modern gas - fired
plants may use up to 46 percent less energy to produce the same amount of electricity.»
We're seeing a lot more natural gas
because of its price and the retirement of
coal - fired power
plants.
«Despite the large amount of emissions produced by shipping the
coal such a long distance, our analysis shows that the total emissions would drop
because of the superior energy efficiency of South Korea's newer
coal - fired power
plants,» said Dalia Patiño - Echeverri, assistant professor of energy systems and public policy at Duke.
The two
coal - CCS
plants, however costly, are globally significant
because they could help to end this vicious cycle, says Vivian Scott, who studies CCS policy at the University of Edinburgh.
The amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the air is now at its highest level in human history, largely
because of
coal - burning power
plants and vehicle emissions.
Two years ago the U.S. Department of Energy predicted a resurgence of
coal - fired power
plants because of the rising price of oil and natural gas.
While investment in China's power grid has risen substantially, the country still has some of the world's highest curtailment rates for renewable energy, meaning thousands of turbines are taken offline, even under optimum wind conditions,
because grid operators lack the knowledge and skills to integrate the clean energy with other sources, including baseload power from
coal plants.
Until advanced
coal - combustion technologies become widely available that allow CO2 to be captured and stored safely underground, the shift to
coal is bad news for climate change
because coal plants usually emit about twice the CO2 per kilowatt - hour of electricity that gas
plants do.
They found that
because natural gas
plants are overall more efficient than
coal plants, producing more energy per unit of carbon, they could cause less warming in the long term.
Natural gas might still have an advantage over
coal when burned to create electricity,
because gas - fired power
plants tend to be newer and far more efficient than older facilities that provide the bulk of the country's
coal - fired generation.
That number is hard to predict,
because although reactors would exploit current technologies and techniques, so will modern
coal and natural gas
plants.
Greenpeace's goal in India is to stop all new
coal - fired power
plants because the resulting carbon emissions would contribute to global warming, even though scientists caution that renewable energy has not yet matured enough to supplant future
coal - fired generation.
However,
because gas,
coal and oil are millions of years old, their carbon has a key difference compared to the carbon cycling through
plants.
Allegedly that's
because these new
coal plants are «super-efficient» getting more power with less
coal.
Because nine of every 10 tons of the nation's
coal vanishes into power plants, many Americans hold the illusion that coal is no longer a major energy player, but here's the reality: Coal produces at least half of the nation's electricity, and we're burning more o
coal vanishes into power
plants, many Americans hold the illusion that
coal is no longer a major energy player, but here's the reality: Coal produces at least half of the nation's electricity, and we're burning more o
coal is no longer a major energy player, but here's the reality:
Coal produces at least half of the nation's electricity, and we're burning more o
Coal produces at least half of the nation's electricity, and we're burning more of...
The current wave of history books written from the point of view of one, often seemingly unimportant product, whether it be salt,
coal, spices,
plants, or in the case of this book, drinks, sends me into positive paroxysms of happiness,
because they present history in a form that I actually enjoy!
I myself have been accused of being a paid shill for the
coal industry,
because I argued that rapidly deploying solar and wind energy technologies, along with efficiency and smart grid technologies, is a much faster and much more cost effective way of reducing GHG emissions from electricity generation than building new nuclear power
plants.
Still, a pilot project burning Montana
coal in IGCC
plants and sequestering the CO2 in Montana geological formations would be a very informative and important step, even if only
because it would help create more market for IGCC
plants and help develop the technology.
Because if
coal to liquids was profitable at the present price of oil, we'd be seeing someone open a
coal to liquids
plant and making a profit based on the difference.
Peabody Energy, the world's largest private
coal company, did not sway from its support (financial or otherwise) for the controversial ads placed in Kansas newspapers on Monday that said Iranian, Venezuelan and Russian leaders were smiling
because of the governor's recent rejection of two applications for
coal - burning power
plants.
But
coal is not «cheap» for the Appalachian communities destroyed by mountaintop removal (see appvoices.org), nor for the miners killed or sickened
because worker safety would be too costly for mine owners, nor for the areas made permanently dead from the mining practices, nor for the children poisoned by the toxic fumes of even the cleanest - burning
coal plants, not to mention the entire planet, every species, every community, every neighborhood being damaged and degraded by the global warming
coal burning causes.
There is no denying that the arctic is melting at a record - setting pace and that this is related to global warming and climate change, but Box is pursuing a theory that soot from wildfires and burning
coal in power
plants is making Greenland's glaciers melt even faster than they would
because of global warming alone.
So doing carbon sequestration out of a natural gas [power
plant] flue is a lot easier than out of a
coal flue,
because there isn't the sulfuric acid.
China is building far more such
plants because they recognize that
coal is essential to power a healthy economy and the new generation of
coal plants offer great environmental advantage.
EPA Rules Controlling Greenhouse - gas Emissions — The big day for Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy should come sometime in June, when her agency is scheduled to unveil historic standards controlling carbon emissions from the nation's fleet of power
plants, which includes nearly 600
coal - fired
plants poised to be hit the hardest,
because coal emits more carbon than oil or natural gas.
It's deployment is necessarily slow
because it needs a large pipe network and new power
plants and increased
coal and gas extraction (to help power the capture and storage).
I know some here will decry that I am not talking about the issues
because I do not try to obsfuscate with a discussion of the spot market price of
coal vs long - term contracts, or use of coal in locations other than Kansas, or Al Gore's footprint, but the issue of Global Warming IS politics (non-ratification of Kyoto and negative flag - waving ads about politicians who oppose coal), it IS public relations («Clean Coal», cleanest coal - fired plants, surface mining and mountain - top reoval rather than strip mining, etc.), and it IS about misrepresentation (Peobody framing the debate as coal vs NG when it is really coal vs every other energy source), and it IS about greed (the coal industry doing everything it can to scuttle every other energy alternati
coal vs long - term contracts, or use of
coal in locations other than Kansas, or Al Gore's footprint, but the issue of Global Warming IS politics (non-ratification of Kyoto and negative flag - waving ads about politicians who oppose coal), it IS public relations («Clean Coal», cleanest coal - fired plants, surface mining and mountain - top reoval rather than strip mining, etc.), and it IS about misrepresentation (Peobody framing the debate as coal vs NG when it is really coal vs every other energy source), and it IS about greed (the coal industry doing everything it can to scuttle every other energy alternati
coal in locations other than Kansas, or Al Gore's footprint, but the issue of Global Warming IS politics (non-ratification of Kyoto and negative flag - waving ads about politicians who oppose
coal), it IS public relations («Clean Coal», cleanest coal - fired plants, surface mining and mountain - top reoval rather than strip mining, etc.), and it IS about misrepresentation (Peobody framing the debate as coal vs NG when it is really coal vs every other energy source), and it IS about greed (the coal industry doing everything it can to scuttle every other energy alternati
coal), it IS public relations («Clean
Coal», cleanest coal - fired plants, surface mining and mountain - top reoval rather than strip mining, etc.), and it IS about misrepresentation (Peobody framing the debate as coal vs NG when it is really coal vs every other energy source), and it IS about greed (the coal industry doing everything it can to scuttle every other energy alternati
Coal», cleanest
coal - fired plants, surface mining and mountain - top reoval rather than strip mining, etc.), and it IS about misrepresentation (Peobody framing the debate as coal vs NG when it is really coal vs every other energy source), and it IS about greed (the coal industry doing everything it can to scuttle every other energy alternati
coal - fired
plants, surface mining and mountain - top reoval rather than strip mining, etc.), and it IS about misrepresentation (Peobody framing the debate as
coal vs NG when it is really coal vs every other energy source), and it IS about greed (the coal industry doing everything it can to scuttle every other energy alternati
coal vs NG when it is really
coal vs every other energy source), and it IS about greed (the coal industry doing everything it can to scuttle every other energy alternati
coal vs every other energy source), and it IS about greed (the
coal industry doing everything it can to scuttle every other energy alternati
coal industry doing everything it can to scuttle every other energy alternative).
Air pollution in Beijing is severe
because of the many factories,
coal plants and cars, but weather patterns make the situation even worse.
Coal is clearly created from plant material, because of fossilised remains etc appearing in coal, so its not a great leap of faith to believe oil is created from remains of small ocean creatu
Coal is clearly created from
plant material,
because of fossilised remains etc appearing in
coal, so its not a great leap of faith to believe oil is created from remains of small ocean creatu
coal, so its not a great leap of faith to believe oil is created from remains of small ocean creatures.
Below is a note sent to me by Vic Svec, who you heard from here earlier in the year in relation to efforts by Gov. Kathleen Sebelius of Kansas, a rising star in the Democratic Party, to deny permits for two proposed
coal - burning power
plants because of their potential contribution to global warming.
That's
because of the arsenic, lead, boron, and selenium that Ameren Corporation's
coal plants have put into the Mississippi, Missouri, and Meramec rivers.
An important question that political and climate analysts will be examining is how much bite is in the regulations — meaning how much they would curb emissions beyond what's already happening to cut power
plant carbon dioxide thanks to the natural gas boom, the shutdown of old
coal - burning
plants because of impending mercury - cutting rules (read the valuable Union of Concerned Scientists «Ripe for Retirement» report for more on this), improved energy efficiency and state mandates developing renewable electricity supplies.
While the United States is shutting down old
coal - fired power
plants and not building new ones, Europe — also
because of the commitment in Germany to get out of nuclear power — is moving back to
coal.