Sentences with phrase «coal pollution because»

The implications of the amount of lives that could have been saved in this eight - year timeframe is staggering: tens of thousands of people have likely been unnecessarily killed by coal pollution because of the delay.

Not exact matches

The nation has already overtaken the U.S. as the world's largest greenhouse gas emitter largely because of the more than three billion metric tons of coal it burns annually — and several thousand miners die each year digging up the dirty black rock to feed China's energy needs, not to mention the health toll taken by choking air pollution caused by coal burning in the Middle Kingdom, estimated by the World Bank to cost the country $ 100 billion a year in medical care.

Yes, for the individual owner it maybe does, but that at the cost of the rest of the world, because electric energy still comes mostly from coal / oil / nuclear power generators for one, with correspondent pollution and infrastructure load.

We've known for some time that air pollution created in Asia — largely because of fast expanding economic activity fueled by coal — spreads far and wide, even reaching the shores of the United States.

Air pollution in Beijing is severe because of the many factories, coal plants and cars, but weather patterns make the situation even worse.

If someone in India dies from air pollution related diseases because India insists on cheap energy, so passes on the need for cleaning up coal combustion.

From sheer thermal inertia of the oceans, but also because if you close down all coal power stations etc., aerosol pollution in the atmosphere, which has a sizeable cooling effect, will go way down, while CO2 stays high.

Because switching from coal to cleaner and more affordable energy would result in less coal mined, less coal burned, and less carbon pollution emitted, BLM's decisions do have a climate impact — and a big one at that.

Stern said that electricity from coal - fired power stations only appeared cheaper because the costs of air pollution and climate change were not included.

But because coal is one of the cheapest ways to fuel electricity, with abundant stores all around the world, global carbon pollution is growing.

Oil and Coal companies are laughing their asses off at the thought of people being against wind power because it kills birds — even if it were true (which it is not) could clean small wind power possibly kill as many birds as oil spills and ground water and air pollution from coal / oil poCoal companies are laughing their asses off at the thought of people being against wind power because it kills birds — even if it were true (which it is not) could clean small wind power possibly kill as many birds as oil spills and ground water and air pollution from coal / oil pocoal / oil power?

China has decided to cap coal simply because of domestic pollution.

When asked why, it's because he's «directly affected by the reality of climate change and, most importantly, to prevent thousands of future deaths and destruction of the rich biodiversity of the island due to coal pollution.»

UBS analysts say utilities in Europe need to shut down 30 % of their gas, coal, and oil - fed power capacity by 2017, not to fight global warming, cut pollution, or cut fuel imports, but because renewable energy is pushing fossil fuels off the grid.

Essentially, the coal - fired plants closed because they are now required to remove various pollutants from their stack gases, but can not afford to retrofit the plants with the pollution control equipment.

China is certainly anxious to clean up its power generation because of the pollution, but it is now clear that the 3 per cent coal tariff was aimed not so much at reducing emissions but to try and make Australia agree to free trade agreement concessions — which it should not do.

If it comes from coal, the electric cars produce 3.6 times more soot and smog deaths than gas, because of the pollution made in generating the electricity, according to the study that is published Monday by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Anathema to environmentalists because it creates so much pollution, coal still has the undeniable advantages of being widely available and easy to ship and burn.

Furthermore, it would be difficult to use healthcare costs in favor of solar energy plants because the vast majority of air pollution related healthcare costs are associated with AUTOMOBILE exhaust, not coal or gas energy plants.

Shutting down coal plants because of their appalling toxic pollution is just as desirable as shutting them down because of their damaging GHG emissions.

Ignore the intense pollution caused by coal combustion in China because it doesn't fit into your agenda.

The reference to «clean coal» was somewhat unclear in this context, because clean coal refers to attempts to recapture carbon released when coal is burnt or to otherwise reduce coal pollution during the combustion process.

The federal coal leasing program amounts to a major fossil fuel subsidy, favoring coal at the expense of cleaner forms of generating electricity.A recent federal court ruling rejected BLM's argument that increasing the supply of coal would not increase carbon pollution, in part because coal competes with cleaner methods of generating electricity.

Because of the tight limits on carbon pollution called for in the proposed rule, using CCS would become the only way to build any new coal - fired power plants, a restriction coal advocates have said will effectively kill the industry.

So comparing it to nuclear or coal is misleading because wind serves a different purpose; every time it blows there's a substantial decrease in carbon emissions, volatile fossil fuel costs, water for cooling, manufacturing and pollution.

Apart from that, wind power saves lives because it reduces the air pollution from coal - fired power stations that kills millions of people each year: one in eight of all deaths worldwide are due to air pollution according to the World Health Organisation.

The world is warming because of carbon pollution from fossil fuels like oil and coal.

Many lines of evidence now confirm our planet is warming because of carbon pollution released when humans burn fossil fuels like oil and coal.

But despite increasing calls for China to reduce its coal - burning — not only because of climate impacts but because of infamous, choking air pollution — it has been unclear whether the country has made enough effort to actually make a dent in its consumption.

«People who live near NGS are suffering from health concerns - the families on the Navajo reservation are sick because of the coal plant's pollution,» says Kathy, a mental health counselor in Phoenix.

For example, your home's electricity might seem clean because the air pollution is actually at the coal - fired power plant and not in your neighborhood, or the cheap single - use products that depend on horrible or toxic working conditions in another country, as well as the relatively cost - free (to the manufacturer and seller) disposal of those products.

Winter typically brings the worst air pollution to northern China because of a combination of weather conditions and an increase in the burning of coal for homes and municipal heating systems, which usually start on a specific date.

Over time, coal plants grew in size, facing pressure to locate far from population because of their pollution.

Because coal — by far the most carbonintensive fossil fuel — will most likely be replaced by cleaner energy sources; in that case, the moment China's coal consumption plateaus will also be the moment their greenhouse - gas pollution plateaus.

That's because the bill gives utilities a financial incentive to keep burning coal by joining the cap - and - trade system — a kind of marketplace where polluters could reduce their emissions on paper by buying pollution reductions created by others.

This is important to Oceana because air pollution from coal eventually ends up in the ocean, making the water acidic and raising the water temperature, which causes other problems for ocean life.

Because natural gas produces about half the carbon dioxide that coal does, and almost no soot, this has both long - term global climate benefits and immediate pollution benefits.

He says that the technology is remarkably cost - effective, which is exactly what it needs to compete the energy market, not only against other solar vendors, but also against other sources that have unfair advantages (coal is cheap because of «externalities» like air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions).

On reason some support RPSs is because they are concerned about air pollution from coal.

In August 2015 their council in Caerphilly unanimously rejected mining company Miller - Argent's proposal for a new open cast coal mine because of harmful pollution.