Sentences with phrase «coal production compared»

The government now controls 80 percent of the country's coal production compared with about 45 percent in 2010.

Not exact matches

Australian thermal coal was three per cent lower year on year whilst semi-soft coal production slipped seven per cent compared with 2010.

Chief executive Tom Albanese said «We had a solid first quarter with increased production of iron ore, coal, bauxite, alumina and titanium dioxide compared with the first quarter of 2011.

The team also compared these results with regional economic and demographic data, as well as other information that provided clues to the sources — for example, data on human populations, livestock populations, electricity production from power plants, oil and natural gas production, production from oil refineries, rice production, and coal production.

Carbon Tracker compared demand for fossil fuels in a 1.75 C world — the mid-point of the Paris Agreement — with demand in a 2.7 C world, looking at oil, gas and coal production to 2035 and capital investment to 2025.

Burning wood instead of coal therefore creates a carbon debt — an immediate increase in atmospheric CO2 compared to fossil energy — that can be repaid over time only as — and if — NPP [net primary production] rises above the flux of carbon from biomass and soils to the atmosphere on the harvested lands.»

Coal production and minemouth steam coal prices are lower compared with the AEO2015 Reference case in the early years following Clean Power Plan implementation (Figures 9 and 10, and Tables 3 andCoal production and minemouth steam coal prices are lower compared with the AEO2015 Reference case in the early years following Clean Power Plan implementation (Figures 9 and 10, and Tables 3 andcoal prices are lower compared with the AEO2015 Reference case in the early years following Clean Power Plan implementation (Figures 9 and 10, and Tables 3 and 4).

Thus, the NETL analysis concluded that there was little difference in the total amount of life cycle climate pollution between «U.S. LNG exports for power production in European and Asian markets... when compared to regional coal extraction and consumption for power production.»

African coal production was small compared to most other continents, despite a doubling of coal production between 1980 and 2010.

Central and South American coal production was small compared to other continents, accounting for only 1 % of global production in 2010, most of which was in Colombia (83 %).

Gas is in the money compared to coal, due to a combination of tougher EU - level emissions standards for coal, rising carbon prices and fuel price levels leading to favourable economic terms for electricity production from gas.

In fact, as recently as 2010, natural gas accounted for just 22 percent of U.S. electricity production, compared to 44 percent for coal.

When potential supply is compared to the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) Annual Energy Outlook (AEO) 2016 Reference Case for PRB coal production, which does not constrain warming to 2 °C, total business as usual (BAU) supply is provided by existing leases until 2031, with production from new leases only being required thereafter.

This analysis compares potential future coal, oil and gas production out to 2035 by their break - even cost and overlays the level of demand needed in a 2 °C scenario according to the IEA.

Theoretically, CCS would reduce emissions by 90 percent but also decrease efficiency and increase cost compared with traditional coal production.

Well, India has a lot of coal to burn — «Coal production in the country during the year 2010 - 11 was 533 million tonnes (MTs) as compared to 532 MTs during 2009 - 10, registering a growth of 0.1coal to burn — «Coal production in the country during the year 2010 - 11 was 533 million tonnes (MTs) as compared to 532 MTs during 2009 - 10, registering a growth of 0.1Coal production in the country during the year 2010 - 11 was 533 million tonnes (MTs) as compared to 532 MTs during 2009 - 10, registering a growth of 0.12 %.

It is confusing for the reader if you compare electricity production of one technologie with coal consuption as a whole.

The in situ process intends to utilise the insulative properties of coal combined with the controlled delivery mechanism of the high kinetic energy of water and catalysts (supplemented by natural catalysts / impurities located in all coal seams) to achieve liquefaction at a targeted 350 °C, thereby maximizing liquids production when compared to other coal liquefaction processes.

Just compare the yearly deaths producing coal, gas, and oil and energy produced from that to the deaths associated with nuclear production and it is staggering what a difference it is.

Western coal production will drop by 34 percent, or 214 million tons, in 2024 if the Clean Power Plan is enacted, compared to a business - as - usual scenario.

Compared with remaining reserves of coal as of 2005 plus postulated additions to reserves to 2050, these cases predict that coal production from 2006 to 2050 will use up 34 — 40 % of currently remaining ultimate world coal reserves.

Combining the effects of combustion, production, distribution, and leaked methane gives the fuel about the same GHG emissions as coal - 33 grams of CO2, compared to 31.9 grams for coal.