«When
coal releases into the water, the mussel population goes into deep freeze.
Not exact matches
The mounting evidence for climate change, and all its tragic consequences, has provided a powerful argument against fossil fuel power stations: the burning of
coal, gas and oil
releases carbon dioxide
into the atmosphere and this is almost certainly responsible for global warming.
Much of this energy still comes from the burning of fossil fuels like oil,
coal and natural gas, which
release carbon dioxide (CO2)
into the atmosphere and contribute to extreme weather patterns that imperil everyone on earth — especially our food producers.
There are great mounds of imported
coal being loaded onto rail cars for shipment to a local power station to be burned and
release thousands of tons of climate - changing carbon
into the atmosphere.
Even in a seemingly implausible accidental -
release scenario in which all of a well's hydraulic fracturing fluid and untreated wastewater were discharged directly
into surface waters for the lifetime of the well, shale - gas electricity had a lower lifetime human toxicity impact, or HTI, than
coal electricity, according to the study.
There are over 100 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) found in oil,
coal and tar, which are readily
released into the environment when fossil fuels are burned.
In fact, if one of today's plug - ins draws its juice from a current
coal - burning power plant, then overall it will cause slightly more carbon dioxide to be
released into the air than a standard hybrid.
Power plants burned
coal that
released sulfur
into the atmosphere, but
coal use has declined.
Most eventually finds its way
into the environment, along with mercury
released from burning
coal, smelting metal, making cement and incinerating waste.
When it burns,
coal releases sulfate aerosol particulates
into the atmosphere that reflect some of the sun's incoming energy back
into space.
In other words,
coal mining companies own the
coal they extract but not the methane that mingles with it and is
released into the atmosphere during production.
Some of it is returned to watersheds in altered forms - like water heated during
coal - fired electrical production and stored in cooling towers or ponds before being
released - at higher temperatures - back
into rivers.
«Produced» water from
coal - bed methane extraction
releases underground water with high mineral content
into watersheds.
More than 1 billion gallons of toxic sludge were
released into a Tennessee community when a dam collapsed last December, causing a massive
coal - ash spill at the Kingston Fossil Plant, a
coal - burning power plant owned by the Tennessee Valley Authority.
Every molecule of methane in the air has 25 times the effect on temperature rise compared to a molecule of carbon dioxide
released into the atmosphere by burning
coal, oil or gas.
«Small - scale gold mining contributes to one third of the mercury
released into the environment today,» says physicist Stephan Robinson of Green Cross Switzerland — Blacksmith's partner in the research and ranking — or nearly as much as
coal burning by power plants.
Hydrogen can also be split from water in high - temperature nuclear reactors or generated from fossil fuels such as
coal or natural gas, with the resulting carbon dioxide captured and sequestered rather than
released into the atmosphere.
A recent report
released by the environmental law firm Earthjustice says 25 million tons of
coal ash are dumped
into American mines every year, threatening ground water.
Although mercury, a neurotoxin, occurs naturally in the environment, it is also
released into the atmosphere when humans burn
coal and other fossil fuels.
Even though large amounts are
released into the air by human activities such as
coal burning, smelting, mining and waste incineration, mercury also occurs naturally in the environment, where it undergoes a complex chemical cycle.
Burning
coal releases sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and other pollutants
into the atmosphere.
Recently published research documents that nearly two - thirds of the industrial carbon pollution
released into the atmosphere since 1854 can be directly traced to the carbon extracted from the Earth by just 90 entities — 83 producers of
coal, oil and natural gas, and 7 cement manufacturers.
If human - caused climate change is to be slowed enough to avert the worst consequences of global warming, carbon dioxide emissions from
coal - fired power plants and other pollutants will have to be captured and injected deep
into the ground to prevent them from being
released into the atmosphere.
Biofuels can also cause a much smaller net
release of carbon dioxide
into the atmosphere than fossil fuels such as
coal and oil.
And as we burn more and more fossil fuels and
coal, that
releases mercury
into the air, which is deposed
into the ocean.
Release: Friday, May 27, 2016 [Theater] Written by: Bryan Singer; Simon Kinberg; Michael Dougherty; Dan Harris Directed by: Bryan Singer In the midst of Magneto's metal - throwing rampage, a burning hot ember of emotion buried deep underneath the rapidly cooling
coals of X-Men: Apocalypse, I glance over to find my friend fast asleep, head buried
into his shoulder and a... Continue reading X-Men: Apocalypse
For the past four years almost nothing meaningful has been done to stop the rampant production and
release into the atmosphere of ever greater amounts of carbon dioxide, and there have even been more frantic calls for more production of oil and expanded use of
coal as a fuel.
The right way is to promote more emission - free nuclear power and encourage the investments necessary to produce electricity from
coal without
releasing carbon
into the air.
In a hundred years or so, we're
releasing millions of years of carbon sequestered in oil, natural gas,
coal, etc
into the atmosphere.
Billions of tonnes of carbon dioxide have been
released into the atmosphere from
coal - fired power stations that would never have been built if it weren't for our fear of nuclear power.
In the U.S., this
coal and the carbon dioxide it will eventually
release into the atmosphere are some of the unwanted leftovers of an America going greener.
Well,
coal burning has
released more radiation
into the environment by far than nuclear has.
If you make charcoal out of it, that would still
release some CO2, of course — but the carbon that ends up as char
coal is held back: Char
coal does not decay that quickly (> 1000y) so if you put it
into soil instead of burning it, you got THE ONLY CARBON SEQUESTRATION METHOD CURRENTLY KNOWN DOABLE.
The situation reminds me of the uncontrolled fires burning in
coal seams from Australia to Pennsylvania, which in 2001 were estimated to be
releasing hundreds of millions of tons of carbon dioxide a year
into the atmosphere.
Last — but not least — the burning of
coal releases huge amounts of carbon dioxide
into the atmosphere.
We can not burn all of the fossil fuels (oil, gas,
coal and unconventional fossil fuels such as tar shale and tar sands) and
release the CO2
into the air without creating a different planet.
Recently published research by Richard Heede of the Climate Accountability Institute documents that nearly two - thirds, 63 percent, of the industrial carbon pollution
released into the atmosphere since 1854 can be directly traced to the carbon extracted from the Earth by just 90 entities — 83 producers of
coal, oil, and natural gas, and seven cement manufacturers.
I talk about how when we burn fossil fuels, such as
coal, oil, and natural gas for our energy, it
releases carbon dioxide (CO2)
into our air supply.
He cautioned, however, that burning oil and
coal to drive our cars and heat our homes — which
releases greenhouse gases
into the atmosphere — is not to blame for an increase in the damage done by hurricanes.
By driving cars, using electricity from
coal - fired power plants, or heating our homes with oil or natural gas, we
release carbon dioxide and other heat - trapping gases
into the atmosphere.
This is due to a combination of particulate matter, sulphur dioxide and oxides of nitrogen that are
released into the atmosphere when
coal is burned.
Using paper fiber as fuel reduces the amount of CO2 permanently
released into the environment compared to the burning of fossil fuels, such as
coal, that are not renewable.
Remember,
Coal combustion
releases CO2 sequestered millions of years ago permanently
into the environment.
Technology currently exists to capture CO2 emissions from
coal - fired plants before they are
released into the environment and to sequester that CO2 in underground geologic formations.
«In generating exactly the same amount of electricity, wood will
release four times as much carbon
into the atmosphere as gas would do, and one and half times as much as
coal.
Paper may have environmental advantages in that unlike
coal, the CO2 (Carbon Dioxide) that is
released into the atmosphere is not additional CO2 freed from
coal sequestration and permanently added to the atmosphere, but may be recaptured by planting a tree to create more paper.
To Myrh: do I understand you correctly as saying that burning of oil (unlike
coal and gas), does * not *
release large quantities of CO2
into the atmosphere?
«The burning of fossil fuels such as oil, gas and
coal releases greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide
into the Earth's atmosphere, which has warmed to levels that can not be explained by natural variability, scientists say,» USA Today reports.
To reduce ozone levels, people can exert tighter control over many activities that
release methane
into the air, from cattle farming to waste - water treatment to
coal mining.
That won't surprise energy realists, but the item I wasn't expecting was the reference in the IEA press
release to growing efforts in China to convert
coal into liquid fuels and especially synthetic natural gas (SNG).