Recently, high resolution gridded baseline climatologies have been developed with which
coarse resolution GCM results have been combined (e.g., Saarikko and Carter, 1996; Kittel et al., 1997).
The climate change impacts community has long bemoaned the inadequate spatial scale of climate scenarios produced from
coarse resolution GCM output (Gates, 1985; Lamb, 1987; Robinson and Finkelstein, 1989; Smith and Tirpak, 1989; Cohen, 1990).
Not exact matches
GCMs tend to be too
coarse to resolve cyclones, but high -
resolution regional models for storm studies exist.
The main adaptation is that climate - model
GCMs have a
coarser «grid
resolution» that allows them to be run for a large number of model - years with the computers available.
Unfortunately, the figure also confirms that the spatial
resolution of theoutput from the
GCMs used in the Mediterranean study is too
coarse for constructing detailed regional scenarios.To develop more detailed regional scenarios, modelers can combine the
GCM results with output from statistical models.3 This is done by constructing a statistical model to explain the observed temperature or precipitation at a meteorological station in terms of a range of regionally - averaged climate variables.
It contains a suite of routines for downscaling
coarse scale global climate model (
GCM) output to a fine spatial
resolution.
The
coarse spatial
resolution of
GCMs presents an important limitation for simulating extreme ETCs, but Eady growth rate biases are likely just as relevant.
Global climate models (
GCMs) tend to simulate too few EETCs, perhaps partly due to their
coarse horizontal
resolution and poorly resolved moist diabatic processes.
The ClimDown R package publishes the routines and techniques of the Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium (PCIC) for downscaling
coarse scale Global Climate Models (
GCMs) to fine scale spatial
resolution.
Impact studies rarely use
GCM outputs directly because
GCM biases are too great and because the spatial
resolution is generally too
coarse to satisfy the data requirements for estimating impacts.
Gcm can not resolve at mesoscale levels (which is the scale length of weather systems) which makes prediction both difficult and problematic as when the
coarse grain
resolution is enhanced we move beyond the physical laws per se.
However, global model projections have
coarse resolution, with grid cell sizes of 200 × 200 km or more, reflecting limitations of the ocean
GCM component of global coupled climate and ocean circulation — biogeochemical models.