Sentences with phrase «coefficient of variation»

The state's coefficient of variation of 12.5 percent indicates moderate disparities in per - pupil spending across districts.

The average coefficient of variation across schools, however, exceeded this benchmark in each year.

In addition, an «equity factor» is calculated for each state, based on a weighted coefficient of variation.

The assay sensitivity is 7.8 pg / tube, and the intraassay coefficients of variation for low and high values are 7.1 % and 4.9 %.

The cortisol radioimmunoassay procedure has an intra-assay and interassay coefficient of variation of 2.95 % and 6.0 % at a concentration of 3.1 μg / dL.

Dosing of mebendazole of 30 - 87 mg / kg / day in humans resulted in plasma levels of 120 -218 nM (260 nM for continuous administration) with coefficients of variation ranging from 27 to 72 %.

New Hampshire also has one of the highest coefficients of variation of the 50 states, at 19.3 percent, another sign that per - pupil spending varies widely across districts.

The overall coefficients of variation estimated from the masked quality control samples were 14.7 % for estradiol, 7.8 % for progesterone, 7.8 % for testosterone, and 6.7 % for SHBG.

Equity: West Virginia has the third - best coefficient of variation of the 50 states: Only Florida and Hawaii, which has a single statewide district, do better.

Education spending still varies widely across districts, though, as South Dakota has a high coefficient of variation, at 18 percent.

The reportable range of the testosterone assay was 6.4 — 722.3 ng / dL, and the intra - and interassay coefficients of variation were less than 5 % and 10 %.

Our expert panelists will discuss new methodologies and recent advances that have allowed the coefficients of variation (CVs) for Western blotting experiments to be reduced below 10 % (currently, CVs are often in the 35 % — 45 % range).

The coefficient of variation of analysis was < 5 %, with a minimum detection limit of 0.1 µM.

For the neuron in Fig. 2, the coefficient of variation was Cv = 0.278 ± 0.016 (mean ± SEM).

Module - specific SI images are analogous to coefficient of variation (CV) images, which are used in ICA analyses to summarize consistency of RSNs at the voxel - level [5].

The coefficient of variation for repeated measures at baseline was less than 10 %.

Furthermore, the coefficient of variation for MVC force within the control and foam rolling conditions was 5 %.

The coefficient of variation among schools for the 1993 — 94 school year was 0.17, dropping to 0.14 by the 2002 — 03 school year.

In Dallas, Fort Worth, and Houston, the coefficients of variation were nearly always more than 0.15, meaning that one - third of the schools in these districts had spending levels that deviated from their district's average by 15 percent (or $ 225,000 for a school of 500 when average spending is $ 3,000 per pupil).

The coefficient of variation calculated in the between - school analysis was consistently higher than that calculated in the between - district analysis.

The state has a coefficient of variation of 10 percent, indicating moderate disparities in per - pupil spending across districts.

Since the mean value of our two spending indexes is 1.0, the coefficient of variation is actually equivalent to the standard deviation in our analysis.

The state does slightly better on the other two equity indicators, the McLoone Index and the coefficient of variation.

Louisiana ranks 10th out of the 50 states on the McLoone Index, and eighth on the coefficient of variation — two other measures of finance equity that show the state has smaller funding disparities across districts than in most other states.

In addition, Delaware ranks fourth on the coefficient of variation, which means that, compared with other states, Delaware has very little variation in funding across its districts.

While we would not feel comfortable claiming, based on the analysis here, that student - based budgeting has been the cause of greater equity in Houston's school funding system, our findings do show that despite an initial increase in the coefficient of variation, Houston schools have over the longer term made modest improvements in equity since the strategy was put into place.

Arkansas» McLoone Index is above average, and the state's coefficient of variation of 11 percent indicates a moderate amount of disparity in funding across districts.

The coefficient of variation measures how wide disparities in funding are across districts.

The state also has a moderate amount of disparity across districts based on its coefficient of variation, at 13.6 percent.

Tennessee ranks 45th on the McLoone Index, and it has a coefficient of variation of 10.7 percent, indicating moderate discrepancies in per - pupil spending across districts.

In this analysis, we adjust spending figures to reflect differences in district size and in the costs of providing education before calculating the coefficient of variation.

In contrast, Austin had a coefficient of variation near 0.15 for most of the decade, but dipped to the 0.1 level for three years, from 1997 — 98 to 1999 — 2000.

At the district level, the coefficient of variation in 1994 was 0.09, dropping to 0.07 in 2003.

We follow standard practice among school finance researchers who are interested in studying potential inequality at both ends of the spectrum, and calculate for each school year in our study the coefficient of variation for the differences in funding within districts.

Colorado has a coefficient of variation of 11.1, indicating moderate disparities in funding across districts in the state.

Ohio also ranks 32nd for its coefficient of variation, at 13.7 percent, which shows moderate variations in spending across school districts.