Sentences with phrase «coefficients of variation for»

The limit of detection for total urinary As was 0.05 µg / L and was 0.078, 0.15, 0.174, and 0.15 for AsIII, AsV, monomethylarsonic acidV, and dimethylarsinic acidV, respectively, and the coefficient of variation for the sum of the metabolites remained less than 10 %.

The coefficient of variation for repeated measures at baseline was less than 10 %.

Furthermore, the coefficient of variation for MVC force within the control and foam rolling conditions was 5 %.

Each school would receive exactly the average allocation for its mix of students, and the coefficient of variation for each district would be 0.

GCMs underestimate the observed variability (expressed by the standard deviation for temperature and the coefficient of variation for precipitation) in 73 % of cases for temperature and 90 % for precipitation (Fig. 6), and the observed Hurst coefficient in 75 % of cases for temperature and 83 % for precipitation (Fig. 7).

Not exact matches

The RDIs for protein are then a further mathematical estimate, based on two times the coefficient of variation (ie another estimate) of 12 % above the EAR.

Our expert panelists will discuss new methodologies and recent advances that have allowed the coefficients of variation (CVs) for Western blotting experiments to be reduced below 10 % (currently, CVs are often in the 35 % — 45 % range).

Dosing of mebendazole of 30 - 87 mg / kg / day in humans resulted in plasma levels of 120 -218 nM (260 nM for continuous administration) with coefficients of variation ranging from 27 to 72 %.

To assess the consistency of the tissue PMI prediction for a given individual we compute the coefficient of variation (cv), lower values thus indicating more reliable predictions.

For the neuron in Fig. 2, the coefficient of variation was Cv = 0.278 ± 0.016 (mean ± SEM).

Regression coefficients (β) of dietary total fiber and soluble and insoluble fiber for predicting log C - reactive protein (CRP) according to a linear mixed model in the Seasonal Variation of Blood Cholesterol Study, Worcester, MA (1994 — 1998)

The overall coefficients of variation estimated from the masked quality control samples were 14.7 % for estradiol, 7.8 % for progesterone, 7.8 % for testosterone, and 6.7 % for SHBG.

The coefficient of variation among schools for the 1993 — 94 school year was 0.17, dropping to 0.14 by the 2002 — 03 school year.

In Dallas, Fort Worth, and Houston, the coefficients of variation were nearly always more than 0.15, meaning that one - third of the schools in these districts had spending levels that deviated from their district's average by 15 percent (or $ 225,000 for a school of 500 when average spending is $ 3,000 per pupil).

In contrast, Austin had a coefficient of variation near 0.15 for most of the decade, but dipped to the 0.1 level for three years, from 1997 — 98 to 1999 — 2000.

Ohio also ranks 32nd for its coefficient of variation, at 13.7 percent, which shows moderate variations in spending across school districts.

The only trouble spot for the state is its coefficient of variation of 14.4, indicating moderate disparities across districts in education spending.

In addition, an «equity factor» is calculated for each state, based on a weighted coefficient of variation.

It's almost certainly close to linear for small variations, but the basic nonlinearity means that we don't know a priori the coefficient of this linear relationship.

Dobson measurements suffer from a temperature dependence of the ozone absorption coefficients used in the retrievals which might account for a seasonal variation in the error of ± 0.9 % in the middle latitudes and ± 1.7 % in the Arctic, and for systematic errors of up to 4 % [Bernhard et al., 2005].

I looked at the (raw) annual ring widths (in excel) for L00131 - 4 and the annual SD of the widths seems to increase when the trees put down larger rings — their coefficient of variation looks pretty trendless with time.

Note that these figures are the averages, and there would be variations for each coal lease based on its energy content (BTU / lb), type of coal and CO2 coefficient, and the period over which each coal lease may be mined and burned.

Note by the way that MMH is ambiguous on the existence of modelling error: on the one hand they estimate separate, different b coefficients for the different models, on the other, estimate their variances from the temporal variations around those individual model trend lines only.