(1) the temperament and developmental needs of the child; (2) the capacity and the disposition of the parents to understand and meet the needs of the child; (3) the preferences of each child; (4) the wishes of the parents as to custody; (5) the past and current interaction and relationship of the child with each parent, the child's siblings, and any other person, including a grandparent, who may significantly affect the best interest of the child; (6) the actions of each parent to encourage the continuing parent child relationship between the child and the other parent, as is appropriate, including compliance with court orders; (7) the manipulation by or
coercive behavior of the parents in an effort to involve the child in the parents» dispute; (8) any effort by one parent to disparage the other parent in front of the child; (9) the ability of each parent to be actively involved in the life of the child; (10) the child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and community environments; (11) the stability of the child's existing and proposed residences; (12) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, except that a disability of a proposed custodial parent or other party, in and of itself, must not be determinative of custody unless the proposed custodial arrangement is not in the best interest of the child; (13) the child's cultural and spiritual background; (14) whether the child or a sibling of the child has been abused or neglected; (15) whether one parent has perpetrated domestic violence or child abuse or the effect on the child of the actions of an abuser if any domestic violence has occurred between the parents or between a parent and another individual or between the parent and the child; (16) whether one parent has relocated more than one hundred miles from the child's primary residence in the past year, unless the parent relocated for safety reasons; and (17) other factors as the court considers necessary
The method that we used can not rule out the reciprocal effect of temperament on mothers»
coercive behavior and on later physical aggression.
It provides scant support for the proposition (Patterson et al., 1993) that
coercive behavior is learned at home and then carried to the playground.
They observed school - age children with their parents and with their peers and recorded instances of
coercive behavior.
Regardless of the context of the first solicitation, Officer Jones» second solicitation was made in willful refusal to accept Betty's unambiguous «no» for an answer; this is sexually
coercive behavior, specifically postrefusal sexual persistence.
For instance, if a parent engages in
coercive behavior, has a history of domestic violence or a history of substance abuse, it could put the child in danger.
(1) the temperament and developmental needs of the child; (2) the capacity and the disposition of the parents to understand and meet the needs of the child; (3) the preferences of each child; (4) the wishes of the parents as to custody; (5) the past and current interaction and relationship of the child with each parent, the child's siblings, and any other person, including a grandparent, who may significantly affect the best interest of the child; (6) the actions of each parent to encourage the continuing parent child relationship between the child and the other parent, as is appropriate, including compliance with court orders; (7) the manipulation by or
coercive behavior of the parents in an effort to involve the child in the parents» dispute; (8) any effort by one parent to disparage the other parent in front of the child; (9) the ability of each parent to be actively involved in the life of the child; (10) the child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and community environments; (11) the stability of the child's existing and proposed residences; (12) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, except that a disability of a proposed custodial parent or other party, in and of itself, must not be determinative of custody unless the proposed custodial arrangement is not in the best interest of the child; (13) the child's cultural and spiritual background; (14) whether the child or a sibling of the child has been abused or neglected; (15) whether one parent has perpetrated domestic violence or child abuse or the effect on the child of the actions of an abuser if any domestic violence has occurred between the parents or between a parent and another individual or between the parent and the child; (16) whether one parent has relocated more than one hundred miles from the child's primary residence in the past year, unless the parent relocated for safety reasons; and (17) other factors as the court considers necessary.
The FDCPA prohibits abusive or
coercive behavior in pursuit of a debt and awards consumers statutory damages of $ 1,000 for each violation of its code of conduct.
USMMA must then adopt improvements to its training to combat sexual assault, harassment and
coercive behavior.
Dating Abuse is defined as a pattern of
coercive behavior in which one person attempts to control another through threats or actual use of physical violence, sexual assault, and verbal or psychological abuse.
The training program, called «My Voice, My Choice,» emphasizes that victims do not invite sexual violence and that they have the right to stand up for themselves because violent or
coercive behavior is never OK.
She defined it as a pattern of
coercive behavior rooted in the need to maintain power or control.
Cuomo has directed the state Labor Department to investigate reports of threatening and
coercive behavior at Albany Medical Center, where nurses are attempting to unionize.
United Airlines employees have also come under fire for
coercive behavior in the past, particularly when they dragged a man off of a flight last year.
CD involves a number of problematic behaviors, including oppositional and defiant behaviors and antisocial activities (eg, lying, stealing, running away, physical violence, sexually
coercive behaviors).
Aggression and
coercive behaviors in early adult relationships: Findings from the Oregon Youth Study — Couples Study.
Establish a positive interaction with the child by reducing / eliminating parental
coercive behaviors and providing positive attention to the child for appropriate behaviors (and ignoring minor child inappropriate behaviors that are primarily attention - seeking)
Not exact matches
Jonathan, You are correct that discerning whether
behavior, either our own or another's, is
coercive or manipulative is not easy.
Divorced parents are also prone to use more
coercive and controlling
behaviors.
«We put into place the strongest and most comprehensive anti-sexual harassment protections in the nation, ending once and for all the secrecy and
coercive practices that have enabled this unacceptable
behavior for far too long.»
In the past, theories of a link between low intelligence and criminal
behavior, for example, sparked a movement of «
coercive eugenics,» which resulted in forced sterilizations in the name of crime control.
'' This is a term that chillingly evokes
coercive state intervention to control individual reproductive
behavior.
Finally, with reward /
coercive authority, the teacher uses punishments and rewards to influence student
behavior.
The dysfunctional nature of how urban schools teach students to relate to authority begins in kindergarten and continues through the primary grades.With young children, authoritarian, directive teaching that relies on simplistic external rewards still works to control students.But as children mature and grow in size they become more aware that the school's
coercive measures are not really hurtful (as compared to what they deal with outside of school) and the directive,
behavior modification methods practiced in primary grades lose their power to control.Indeed, school authority becomes counterproductive.From upper elementary grades upward students know very well that it is beyond the power of school authorities to inflict any real hurt.External controls do not teach students to want to learn; they teach the reverse.The net effect of this situation is that urban schools teach poverty students that relating to authority is a kind of game.And the deepest, most pervasive learnings that result from this game are that school authority is toothless and out of touch with their lives.What school authority represents to urban youth is «what they think they need to do to keep their school running.»
«Don't Shoot the Dog: The New Art of Teaching and Training» is concerned with altering animal
behavior without being
coercive.
Taxes are... a far cheaper and less
coercive way to curtail [harmful]
behavior than laws or prescriptive regulations.
Divorced parents are also prone to use more
coercive and controlling
behaviors.
Individual risk factors for perpetration include alcohol and drug use, delinquency, empathic deficits, general aggressiveness and acceptance of violence, early sexual initiation,
coercive sexual fantasies, preference for impersonal sex and sexual - risk taking, exposure to sexually explicit media, hostility towards women, adherence to traditional gender role norms, hyper - masculinity, suicidal
behavior, and prior sexual victimization or perpetration.
Relatively minor examples of aggressive and
coercive acts in the home and school may be early signs of adolescent delinquent
behavior (Feil, Walker, and Severson, 1995).
It allows
coercive parenting
behavior to exist in the family, which could translate to the child.
Of the psychological therapies, parent management training (PMT) is the method demonstrated to have the most impact on the child's
coercive pattern of
behavior.
Dishion, Duncan, Eddy, Fagot, and Fetrow (1994) studied a type of social
behavior they called «
coercive» (i.e., hostile, uncooperative, or bossy).
Best predictors at 5 months of age were mothers»
coercive parenting
behavior (OR: 2.3; CI: 1.1 — 4.7) and family dysfunction (OR: 2.2; CI: 1.2 — 4.1).
For example, Compton et al. [37] noted that a poor familial environment (e.g.
coercive family interactions) is a shared risk factor for externalized
behaviors and depressive symptoms in girls, but only for externalised symptoms in boys [37].
This is somewhat consistent with the suggestion that conduct problems in high CU children are less influenced by
coercive parental responding to this
behavior, including harsh discipline and criticism [58, 64, 65].
Authoritative control reflects child - oriented and inductive discipline techniques such as guiding the child's
behavior cognitively, giving information, and stimulating responsible
behavior of the child, while authoritarian control refers to adult - oriented,
coercive, restrictive, and firm discipline techniques and emphasizes the negative aspects of control such as harsh punishment and love withdrawal (e.g., Baumrind 1968, 1971).
If the family is extremely dysfunctional, the child has an additional diagnosis, or the sexual
behavior is aggressive,
coercive, or extremely compulsive, 6 to 9 months is more likely.
In addition to more than 200 peer - reviewed journal articles, he has authored or co-authored several books: Families, Living with Children,
Coercive Family Process, Families with Aggressive Children, Parents and Adolescents, Antisocial Boys, and Antisocial
Behavior.
Families, Living with Children,
Coercive Family Process, Families with Aggressive Children, Parents and Adolescents, Antisocial Boys, and Antisocial
Behavior
The discussion about «one partner seek [ing] to control the other through the use of abusive patterns or
behaviors that operate at a variety of levels - emotional, psychological, and physical» (p. 8) will lead the DV community to focusing on the
coercive control aspects, while not noticing the more dangerous family dynamic approach on which most mental health professionals will focus.
Cultures that value competitiveness and the pursuit of personal goals seem to allow for more
coercive and aggressive
behavior than cultures that emphasize group harmony.
While a genetic basis for the findings is possible, altered parenting likely has a significant mediating role.15 For example, a recent meta - analysis found that maternal depression and psychological distress were associated with increased negative and
coercive parenting
behaviors and disengagement from the child.36 A father may then attenuate the influence of a mother's depression with increased caring
behavior directed to the children.37, 38 Alternatively, a healthy father may offer support directly to the affected mother.14 Future work may explicate these mechanisms by examining specific measures of mothers» and fathers» role functioning.
Overinvolved parenting may promote internalizing problems by increasing levels of psychological distress and feelings of depression and hopelessness in offspring (McKee et al., 2007), or it may socialize youth to use
coercive and hostile
behaviors in family interactions and outside of the family (i.e., externalizing problems; Dodge, Coie, & Lynam, 2006).
The meta - analytic evidence pointing to persistent pursuit as a gendered
behavior is reviewed, and
coercive control theory is used to explain gender differences.
For example, children with
behavior problems can negatively influence their parents» parenting styles to be more punitive and
coercive, thus contributing to a vicious cycle of dysfunction (Petit, Laird, Dodge, Bates, & Criss, 2001).
Consistent with this hypothesis, there is ample evidence that depressive symptoms, both at a clinical and subclinical level, in fathers and mothers are associated with various maladaptive parenting
behaviors such as
coercive parenting, overprotectiveness, and low synchrony during parent — child interaction (Lovejoy et al. 2000; McCabe 2014; Wilson and Durbin 2010).
At the end of a 1 - year follow - up, treated children showed less teacher - rated internalizing and less parent - rated
coercive and antisocial
behavior than controls.
While prior research has highlighted the importance of harsh parenting as a predictor of antisocial
behavior [51, 57], most of the research has focused on early childhood experience and has not considered the possibility that
coercive parenting may continue or abate as children begin to mature.
Thus, attachment and harsh parenting represent distinct forces (support and
coercive control) that exemplify the quality of the parent - child social bond and independently influence antisocial
behavior.
Genotype — environment correlations in late childhood and adolescence: Antisocial
behavior problems and
coercive parenting