Sentences with phrase «coercive control in»

The present study suggests that this acceptance may have been premature... Results from this study indicate that the use of the IT / SCV typology does not consistently work better than a simple measure of the breadth of violent acts used by respondents» husbands to predict negative outcomes of partner violence victimization... [and] both of these measurement strategies fail to examine the general effect of husbands» control... The preliminary empirical evidence reported here suggests that these victims of coercive control are an unrecognized category of victims... IPV researchers should focus on the dynamics of coercive control in intimate abuse whether or not this control occurs in the context of physical violence.

There, we have worked on how to include the patterns of family coercion: coercive control in domestic violence, child abuse and parental alienation.

That's why Women's Aid and WCRS released a new series of ads to shed more light on the role of coercive control in domestic abuse.

While it's great the government took steps to criminalise coercive control in support of survivors of domestic abuse, the cuts mean forces are not equipped to enforce the law.

Not exact matches

In fact the pill seems to have been put in place to thwart Carl Icahn, who really is exactly the sort of guy who would run a coercive two - step tender offer to put pressure on shareholders so he can take control of a companIn fact the pill seems to have been put in place to thwart Carl Icahn, who really is exactly the sort of guy who would run a coercive two - step tender offer to put pressure on shareholders so he can take control of a companin place to thwart Carl Icahn, who really is exactly the sort of guy who would run a coercive two - step tender offer to put pressure on shareholders so he can take control of a company.

A most particular threat to the human rights project is the coercive use of foreign aid and other international programs in order to advance alleged rights related to procreation, population control, and the independence of children from their parents (in the name of «children's rights»).

This degrading of human lives is evident in proposals for coercive population control, as well as in the return of eugenics in various manipulations of human reproduction.

If in saying that the world is God's body, we mean that God controls the world in the same way that we control our bodies, then we have the same moral problems with God that we have with humans who rely on coercive power.

I understand that the phrase «God loves you too much to leave you as you are» can be and has been used in abusive, coercive and controlling ways.

That God's control is in fact limited by the existence of evil would signify a limited coercive power, but it is compatible with unlimited persuasive power.

Consider the extreme instance in which God is conceive» as exerting unlimited coercive power, thereby controlling and determining all things.

I have no problem with that agenda in a world in which coercion is necessary to control a fallen humanity, and in which the coercive powers of government are themselves wielded by fallen humans.

In the infant - toddler years, these take the form of sensitive - responsiveness, which is known to foster attachment security, 1 and mutually - positive parent - child relations, which themselves promote child cooperation, compliance and conscience development.2 In the preschool through adolescent years, authoritative (vs. neglectful) parenting that mixes high levels of warmth and acceptance with firm control and clear and consistent limit - setting fosters prosocial orientation, achievement striving, and positive peer relations.3, 4,5 Across childhood and adolescence, then, parenting that treats the child as an individual, respecting developmentally - appropriate needs for autonomy, and which is not psychologically intrusive / manipulative or harshly coercive contributes to the development of the kinds of psychological and behavioural «outcomes» valued in the western worlIn the infant - toddler years, these take the form of sensitive - responsiveness, which is known to foster attachment security, 1 and mutually - positive parent - child relations, which themselves promote child cooperation, compliance and conscience development.2 In the preschool through adolescent years, authoritative (vs. neglectful) parenting that mixes high levels of warmth and acceptance with firm control and clear and consistent limit - setting fosters prosocial orientation, achievement striving, and positive peer relations.3, 4,5 Across childhood and adolescence, then, parenting that treats the child as an individual, respecting developmentally - appropriate needs for autonomy, and which is not psychologically intrusive / manipulative or harshly coercive contributes to the development of the kinds of psychological and behavioural «outcomes» valued in the western worlIn the preschool through adolescent years, authoritative (vs. neglectful) parenting that mixes high levels of warmth and acceptance with firm control and clear and consistent limit - setting fosters prosocial orientation, achievement striving, and positive peer relations.3, 4,5 Across childhood and adolescence, then, parenting that treats the child as an individual, respecting developmentally - appropriate needs for autonomy, and which is not psychologically intrusive / manipulative or harshly coercive contributes to the development of the kinds of psychological and behavioural «outcomes» valued in the western worlin the western world.

Just eight out of 43 forces in England and Wales have provided training on coercive control, accounting in part for the low number of prosecutions since the offence was introduced in 2016.

She defined it as a pattern of coercive behavior rooted in the need to maintain power or control.

Also, the biggest liberal concerns about Islamist practices and abuses involve matters that can only be implemented with majority control of the government (e.g. excessive use of corporal punishment in the criminal justice system), but which are much less harmful to non-Muslims, at least, when Muslims can only enforce their ideologies on co-religionists and can only do so via institutions of civil society rather than institutions of coercive government control.

In the past, theories of a link between low intelligence and criminal behavior, for example, sparked a movement of «coercive eugenics,» which resulted in forced sterilizations in the name of crime controIn the past, theories of a link between low intelligence and criminal behavior, for example, sparked a movement of «coercive eugenics,» which resulted in forced sterilizations in the name of crime controin forced sterilizations in the name of crime controin the name of crime control.

Dating Abuse is defined as a pattern of coercive behavior in which one person attempts to control another through threats or actual use of physical violence, sexual assault, and verbal or psychological abuse.

Centring on the late DEEP THROAT actress Linda Lovelace, who was forced into the porn industry by her coercive and abusive husband Chuck Traynor (Peter Sarsgaard), and quickly became the biggest adult star in the business before later taking control of her life and campaigning for women's rights.

As the La Crosse plan attests, and as controlled - choice options based on race (such as that in use in Boston) confirm, unless neighborhoods are economically integrated, the only way to facilitate desegregation is through some coercive element, such as quotas.

The dysfunctional nature of how urban schools teach students to relate to authority begins in kindergarten and continues through the primary grades.With young children, authoritarian, directive teaching that relies on simplistic external rewards still works to control students.But as children mature and grow in size they become more aware that the school's coercive measures are not really hurtful (as compared to what they deal with outside of school) and the directive, behavior modification methods practiced in primary grades lose their power to control.Indeed, school authority becomes counterproductive.From upper elementary grades upward students know very well that it is beyond the power of school authorities to inflict any real hurt.External controls do not teach students to want to learn; they teach the reverse.The net effect of this situation is that urban schools teach poverty students that relating to authority is a kind of game.And the deepest, most pervasive learnings that result from this game are that school authority is toothless and out of touch with their lives.What school authority represents to urban youth is «what they think they need to do to keep their school running.»

Q. Even if I'm ready to make my classroom more democratic or less coercive, how successful can I be if everyone else in my building is still basically trying to control students?

We also have a problem with the use in the press release of such emotive language («the threat of coercive takeover or control tactics»).

In March, however, Sally and her legal team won the right to appeal her conviction on the grounds of fresh evidence in the form of increased understanding of coercive controIn March, however, Sally and her legal team won the right to appeal her conviction on the grounds of fresh evidence in the form of increased understanding of coercive controin the form of increased understanding of coercive control.

A cultural attitude such as this strikes me as less likely to accommodate jealousy or possessive attitudes, power imbalances, controlling and coercive dynamics, or emotional, mental or economic abuse, in all families, whether diamorous or polyamorous.

As I concluded in that earlier post, it seems to me that a cultural attitude more embracing of polyamory and less insistent on monogamy, might be «less likely to accommodate jealousy or possessive attitudes, power imbalances, controlling and coercive dynamics, or emotional, mental or economic abuse, in all families, whether diamorous or polyamorous.»

There are, for example, specific cultural values that support imbalances of power in opposite - sex relationships (parenting norms, women's economic inequality) and exacerbate fears of external interference with the family unit (inviolability of the family unit, hypersexualization of women), and thus promote feelings of jealousy, possessiveness and a need for dominance which in turn support coercive and controlling behaviour.

To provide access to justice (and not just access to the justice system), it is essential for lawyers, judges and immigration officers to take professional training in how to recognize and respond to domestic violence, and in the tactics and dynamics of coercive control.

In many scenarios, the husband often has extreme coercive power of the wife because he frequently controls the couple's finances.

The developmental literature shows that parents who perceive themselves as having little power over their lives are more likely to engage in coercive and punitive parenting practices.2 It is therefore not surprising that the NHVP was most helpful to those families who at the start of the programme perceived themselves as having the least control over their lives.3 In their work with high risk families, one of the most crucial roles clinicians can have is in actively empowering their clients, as did the nurses in the NHVin coercive and punitive parenting practices.2 It is therefore not surprising that the NHVP was most helpful to those families who at the start of the programme perceived themselves as having the least control over their lives.3 In their work with high risk families, one of the most crucial roles clinicians can have is in actively empowering their clients, as did the nurses in the NHVIn their work with high risk families, one of the most crucial roles clinicians can have is in actively empowering their clients, as did the nurses in the NHVin actively empowering their clients, as did the nurses in the NHVin the NHVP.

However, there may have been violence or abuse present in your relationship that was part of a pattern of coercive or controlling behaviour.

Coercive controlling violence and abuse is part of dynamic in which there is a pattern of power and control exercised by one parent over the other.

In some cases it is within a pattern of coercive controlling behaviour and fear.

Although research findings on prevalence are inconclusive, they generally find that women and men report similar levels of violence when the contexts, motives and consequences are not considered.6 When they are considered, studies assessing IPV perpetrated by men compared to women often report gender differences regarding the types of violence, reasons for the violence, context in which the violence occurs and consequences of the violence.6, 7 For example, studies assessing differences in IPV find men's violence against women to be more severe, threatening and controlling8 — 10 and involve longer - lasting victimisation, fear of bodily injury or death, more injuries and more adverse health effects.5, 11, 12 It has also been found that women tend to use physical violence out of anger, not being able to get the partner's attention or in self - defence and retaliation, 11 whereas men often use it as a means to exercise coercive control.13, 14

If you are in danger of being beaten or subjected to what is called «coercive control», that is, your spouse unilaterally limits which friends or family members you can talk to, what you wear, and where you can go.

Of these, coercive controlling violence (CCV; also called intimate terrorism and commonly referred to as domestic violence, spousal abuse, or battery) is the type of intimate partner violence that workers in community or agency settings — hospitals and clinics, domestic abuse or homeless shelters, public safety or law enforcement departments, courts and the legal system — are most likely to encounter (Coker, Smith, McKeown, & King, 2000; Graham - Kevan & Archer, 2003; Johnson, 2006).

On the basis of the interview data, participants subsequently were divided into two relationship groups: (1) a group whose marriages contained physical violence coupled with coercive control (the CCV group) and (2) a group whose marriages contained conflict - motivated physical violence in the absence of coercion and control (the non-CCV or situational violence group).

In this brief review article, we summarize existing literature on the form of intimate partner violence known as coercive controlling violence (CCV), domestic abuse, or intimate terrorism.

Children who have disorganized attachment with their primary attachment figure have been shown to be vulnerable to stress, have problems with regulation and control of negative emotions, and display oppositional, hostile - aggressive behaviours, and coercive styles of interaction.2, 3 They may exhibit low self - esteem, internalizing and externalizing problems in the early school years, poor peer interactions, unusual or bizarre behaviour in the classroom, high teacher ratings of dissociative behaviour and internalizing symptoms in middle childhood, high levels of teacher - rated social and behavioural difficulties in class, low mathematics attainment, and impaired formal operational skills.3 They may show high levels of overall psychopathology at 17 years.3 Disorganized attachment with a primary attachment figure is over-represented in groups of children with clinical problems and those who are victims of maltreatment.1, 2,3 A majority of children with early disorganized attachment with their primary attachment figure during infancy go on to develop significant social and emotional maladjustment and psychopathology.3, 4 Thus, an attachment - based intervention should focus on preventing and / or reducing disorganized attachment.

An integrative review of three theories that explain why some individuals engage in persistent pursuit — coercive control theory, relational goal pursuit, and attachment theory — is presented.

More conceivable is that families become trapped in a coercive cycle or struggle for control (Patterson, 1974).

If such a coercive cycle becomes associated with the demands of diabetes management, it is likely to interfere with the youth's adherence to their treatment regimen, resulting in worsened glycemic control.

This finding is congruent with Patterson's coercion model (Patterson, 1982), suggesting that youth who perceive caregivers as critical or coercive regarding diabetes tasks may resist parental attempts at control by refusing to appropriately adhere to their treatment regimen, causing increases in HbA1c.