Sentences with phrase «cohabiting couples who»

Cohabiting couples who have a child in their twenties and then break up — and that's almost two - fifths of them in the first five years — often also go on to have another partner or partners.44 One study of young urban parents based on data from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study found that for 59 percent of unmarried couples with a baby, at least one partner already had a child from a previous relationship.

The rules about when you can make a claim can be complicated, so it's best to talk to a solicitor who specialises in disputes between cohabiting couples who are splitting up.

Cohabiting couples who went out on a date did no better than those who didn't.

An actuary is unlikely to be used by cohabiting couples who separate because — unlike divorce or dissolution — one partner doesn't have to share their pension with the other.

Cohabiting couples who dated did no better than those who did not go on dates.

There is a redress scheme for cohabiting couples who have been in a long - term relationship or who have had children.

There are 12 times as many cohabiting couples today as there were in the 1970s and 40 percent of first babies born to single mothers are born to cohabiting couples who rarely make it past five years; in fact some two - thirds of the unmarried moms split from the child's biological father and start a new relationship before the kid is 5 years old — how do we «save» those families?)

In addition, a court - administered redress scheme is due to be established for both straight and gay unmarried cohabiting couples who have been living together for five years or more.

The CLRA applies to cohabiting couples who decide to separate, those with children together who have never cohabited, and married couples who have decided to separate but are not seeking a divorce.

In those provisions, the term «spouse» includes cohabiting couples who have lived together for a period of at least three years or cohabiting biological or adoptive parents (s. 29).

In the first of a series of articles David Burrows explores the complex law which confronts cohabiting couples who separate

In the second of a series of articles, David Burrows explores the complex law which confronts cohabiting couples who separate

Ishizuka also found cohabiting couples who have equal earnings are more likely to stay together than couples with unequal earnings.

There are 12 times as many cohabiting couples today as there were in the 1970s and 40 percent of first babies born to single mothers are born to cohabiting couples who rarely make it past five years; in fact some two - thirds of the unmarried moms split from the child's biological father and start a new relationship before the kid is 5 years old — how do we «save» those families?)

Not exact matches

The document first spends a paragraph on cohabiting couples and those who are only civilly married.

The strongest part of After the Boomers is when Wuthnow does this for young adults: the problems of a particular cohabiting couple or a young person who can't quite find her way in a career.

Long - married couples — the envy of many young adults we interviewed — can befriend a young couple (dating, cohabiting, or married) who have little experience with stable marriage.

Homosexual couples who want to commit themselves to a monogamous lifelong relationship find themselves in the same situation as anyone else who cohabits without benefit of marriage.

Which is why studies such as the latest by the Institute for Family Studies, which touts the benefit of marriage over cohabitation when it comes to family instability, bother me: there's no way to know if the couples who cohabit would end up divorced if they wed or if their kids would be worse off if they stayed together — and perhaps subjected their kids to abuse, conflict, addiction or other dysfunctions.

And some studies indicate that the stigma of cohabiting — versus being married — impacts younger couples, probably feeling the need to follow a normative romantic path, much more than older couples, who seem to fare quite well cohabiting or even as living apart together couples.

And for cohabiting couple like economists Betsy Stevenson and Justin Wolfers, who are not married but have a child together and have drawn up a contract, marriage isn't all that necessary — they've done the essential work of detailing what they want their partnership to look like.

There are scant longitudinal studies on independent men and women who prefer to live alone, live apart together for the long term or cohabit, and until there are, we really won't know whether marriage is still the best arrangement for couples.

The real problem with cohabiting is that many couples who enter into it don't give it a lot of thought; it's one of those «just kind of happened» things.

While a few of my middle - aged divorced friends are now in cohabiting relationships, I don't know many long - term couples who never married — just three, and of them only two have raised their children without «a piece of paper» or a ring on a finger.

Nearly a quarter of couples who are cohabiting when they have children will actually go on to get married within five years of becoming parents, according to an analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies which is oddly little cited by the family breakdown lobby.

According to research, by a child's seventh birthday, 31 per cent of the couples who were cohabiting when their child was nine months old had separated, compared to only 12 per cent of married parents.

In Ontario, married couples who are divorcing may apply for support under section 15.2 of the Divorce Act, while cohabiting spouses and married couples who are not seeking divorce may apply for spousal support under section 30 and 33 the Family Law Act.

Sarah Buxton, who qualified in 2005, specialises in matrimonial finance matters including wealth protection for cohabiting and divorced couples as well as children matters such as child arrangement orders that often involve cross-jurisdictional aspects.

In Shackell v the United Kingdom (Dec)(App no 45851 / 99), 27 April 2000, the court found that the situations of married and unmarried heterosexual cohabiting couples were not analogous for the purposes of survivors» benefits, since «marriage remains an institution which is widely accepted as conferring a particular status on those who enter it».

Deputy Master Matthews agreed, he considered that as the act envisages the possibility of a couple who are divorced putting themselves back into the remit of the act by remarrying, why then should the person who cohabits (as opposed to remarries) not be entitled to bring claim under the status of cohabitant.

While the aim of providing genuine fairness for cohabiting couples is laudable, in my view, a very good starting point would be simple legislation providing long term cohabitants and those who have children with equality of division of any home acquired for joint use in a family relationship.

In turn, the Child Support Act 1991 allows a parent to make an application for child maintenance with no distinction being drawn between a couple who have been married and a couple that have merely cohabited.

Roughly half of those couples who split were married and the other half were previously cohabiting.

At present, cohabiting couples — who account for one in 12 of all family units — have few rights under our family laws.

The real problem with cohabiting is that many couples who enter into it don't give it a lot of thought; it's one of those «just kind of happened» things.

Dr. Kuperberg says, «Today 70 percent of women aged 30 to 34 have cohabited with a male partner, and two - thirds of new marriages take place between couples who have already lived together for an average of 31 months.»

The FFCWS studies add to a large body of earlier work that suggested that children who live with single or cohabiting parents fare worse as adolescents and young adults in terms of their educational outcomes, risk of teen birth, and attachment to school and the labor market than do children who grow up in married - couple families.

That share was more than twice the rate in 1980 (18 percent) and an eightfold increase from the rate in 1960 (5 percent).2 Half of the children born to unwed mothers live, at least initially, with a single mother who is not residing with the child's biological father (although about 60 percent of this group say they are romantically involved with the father), while half live with an unwed mother who is cohabiting with the child's father.3 These estimates imply that today one - fifth of all children are born into single - mother families, while another fifth are born into cohabiting - couple families.

Abstract: Jane Waldfogel, Terry - Ann Craigie, and Jeanne Brooks - Gunn review recent studies that use data from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study (FFCWS) to examine why children who grow up in single - mother and cohabiting families fare worse than children born into married - couple households.

Married and cohabiting couples have as much to gain from services to enhance their relationship skills as parents who are separated or divorced or were never married.

Probably, a discussion of divorce rates and divorce statistics must include the dramatic growth in the number of unmarried couples who are cohabiting.

Dating couples seem to argue most about issues such as commitment, time together, and the future of the relationship while married couples tend to argue about issues that come with sharing a household, such as money, children, and the division of labor.4 Cohabiting couples, especially those who have not made a formal commitment to marry each other, may get a particularly high dose of all of these kinds of issues and at a time when they don't necessarily have the commitment to the relationship or the skills yet to be able to tackle them well.

Some research suggests that couples who live together before marriage — i.e. couples who cohabit — are at greater risk for divorce and marital distress.

«Couples who cohabit before marriage (and especially before an engagement or an otherwise clear commitment) tend to be less satisfied with their marriages — and more likely to divorce — than couples who Couples who cohabit before marriage (and especially before an engagement or an otherwise clear commitment) tend to be less satisfied with their marriages — and more likely to divorce — than couples who couples who do not.

No, the material applies equally well to couples who are dating, cohabiting, or engaged.

Worryingly the report said that 21 % of adults surveyed believed that cohabiting couples had the same financial and property claims as those who are married, which is incorrect.

For example, sociologists Wendy Manning and Pamela Smock conducted a qualitative study of cohabiting couples and found that over one half of couples who are living together didn't talk about it but simply slid into doing so.

Before any of these studies were conducted, we predicted that couples who cohabited only after engagement (or marriage) would, on average, do better in marriage than those who began to cohabit prior to having such clear, mutual plans to marry.

SPL also applies to same sex couples, couples who are cohabiting and couples bringing up a child together in a household even if the child is from a previous relationship.

Couples who cohabit prior to marriage because they want to «try things out» often adopt this approach because they already see some potential problems with long - term compatibility.4 It should come as no surprise then that these types of relationships are less than stable if they transition into a marital relationship (in fact, it's very likely that this «group» of cohabiters contributes a large degree to the finding that premarital cohabitation is bad for marriage).