No — we wouldn't expect just whatever some endlessly busted bunch of pseudo scientific quacks say, to define the thermodynamics of a warm rock, being scrubbed by frigid winds, immersed in freezing
cold phase change refrigerant.
Not exact matches
Assuming Proxima b is tidally locked, Webb could then detect
changes in the planet's thermal glow as its
cold, nightside and warm, sunlit dayside shift in and out of view across one complete orbit, rather like watching
phases of the moon as it circles Earth.
But as the seasons
change, with the shift in temperature to cooler days and
cold nights, everyone's body experiences a
phase of down - regulation of metabolism which if you're already on toxic overload and decreased immunity can make you susceptible to catching what's going around.
We have fairly high confidence that we observe the history of Heinrich events (huge discharges of ice - rafted debris from the Laurentide ice sheet through Hudson Bay that are roughly coincident with large southern warming, southward shift of the intertropical convergence zone, extensive sea ice in the north Atlantic, reduced monsoonal rainfall in at least some parts of Asia, and other
changes), and also
cold phases of the Dansgaard / Oeschger oscillations that lack Heinrich layers and are characterized by muted versions of the other climate anomalies I just mentioned.
Many regions are
cold or warm with these
changing phases so odd stations can be cherry picked.
We are talking fractions of a second.They say
changes in the earth's rotation rate may effect the oceanic circulations, causing them to
phase from
cold to warm etc..
A
cold phase transition, which the historical record indicates can occur quite rapidly with large secular temperature
changes on a decadal time scale, would truly be a catastrophe.
Evidence suggests that the negative
phase of the Arctic Oscillation was driven in part by warm air (air warmed by the dramatic seasonal loss of Arctic sea ice) 9 as well as by
changes in snow cover over Eurasia driven by climate
change.10 This event is part of an emerging trend in which a warming climate may paradoxically bring
colder, snowier winters to northern Europe and the eastern United States.11
According to their modeling studies, the difference in the amount of incoming solar radiation, in this case, primarily in the ultraviolet (UV) wavelengths, during the minima and maxima of the 11 - yr solar cycle are large enough to produce a characteristic
change in the winter circulation pattern of the atmosphere over North America... When the NAO is in its negative
phase, more
cold air can seep south from the Arctic and impact the lower latitudes of Europe and the eastern U.S., which helps spin up winter storm systems.
Instead, we suggest that it is because the temperatures at ground level in the Arctic winter are
cold enough to cause something similar to the
phase change which occurs at the tropopause.
Though there can be significant differences in regional surface impacts between one SSW event and another, the typical pattern includes
changes in sea level pressure resembling the negative
phase of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) / Arctic Oscillation (AO), (representing a southward shift in the Atlantic storm track), wetter than average conditions for much of Europe,
cold air outbreaks throughout the mid-latitudes, and warmer than average conditions in eastern Canada and subtropical Asia (see figure below, left panel).
We find that
cold season low ∆ 14C values were higher after the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO)
changed from a positive to a negative
phase.