For example, teams are expected to clarify essential outcomes; develop and utilize the results of common, formative assessments;
collaboratively analyze student learning (particularly the results of formative common assessments); and reflect on their instructional practices in order to improve the learning levels of their students.
Those peers also gain flexible time they can use to learn from their excellent colleagues and to
collaboratively analyze student work and data, and to plan what's next for students.
By
collaboratively analyzing student work, teachers discover the relationship between their instruction and student performance on classroom assessments and other samples of student work.
Not exact matches
These strategies — and the educators who implement them — are empowering
students to think critically, access and
analyze information, creatively problem solve, work
collaboratively, and communicate with clarity and impact.
They meet regularly to
analyze student data and
collaboratively plan how to use it to drive instruction.
When teachers can share (and
collaboratively analyze)
student work, a dialogue develops with teachers asking one another about what they were expecting to see and what they saw that they weren't expecting.
One specific study, which examined five low - performing, high - poverty urban high schools in three districts and their use of data to inform school improvement, concluded that the more school staff worked
collaboratively to discuss and
analyze student performance the more likely staff members were to use data to inform curriculum decisions (Lachat & Smith, 2005).
In this blog post, CEL Project Director Joanna Michelson takes a real - world example and shows step by step how a group of teachers
collaboratively analyzed Elie Wiesel's Nobel lecture «Hope, Despair, and Memory» and found ways to help ninth grade
students to comprehend and interact with the complex text.
Half of a study group would teach the lessons to their
students, and the entire group would
collaboratively analyze the teaching and
student work, and revise the lessons for the other half to use.
Utilizing a Multi-Tiered System of Supports, our multidisciplinary team works
collaboratively to
analyze and problem solve around
student and staff needs.
They pursue this question by systematically collecting examples of
student work over time, and
collaboratively analyzing that work with colleagues who help them make sense of what the
students do and do not know as well as what they can and can not yet do.
These strategies — and the educators who implement them — are empowering
students to think critically, access and
analyze information, creatively problem solve, work
collaboratively, and communicate with clarity and impact.