Private school representatives complained
collecting student test scores, graduation rates, absenteeism and other data would be burdensome.
Not exact matches
Using longitudinally linked,
student - level data
collected from two urban school districts, New York City and Washington, DC, Mathematica estimated the impacts of five EL middle schools on
students» reading and math
test scores.
In addition to
test scores, PISA
collects data on
student learning styles.
(In our research, we ourselves assigned
students randomly to
test and control groups, and we
collected baseline
test scores to verify the lotteries» success.)
«Nearly all states are building high - tech
student data systems to
collect, categorize and crunch the endless gigabytes of attendance logs,
test scores and other information
collected in public schools,» reported the New York Times in a front - page story last May, confirming the scope of the trend.
The data needed to best answer these questions are the
student - level
test -
score and demographic information
collected by the New York State Department of Education.
«I began by
collecting baseline data about my
students, related to attention, memory, physical stamina, and
test scores,» added Tennant.
Before conducting the lotteries, our evaluation team
collected data on
student test scores and family background characteristics.
That is, we compare
students with the same demographic characteristics, the same
test scores in the current year and in a previous year, the same responses to the surveys for other social - emotional measures
collected by the district, and within the same school and grade, to see whether
students who look the same on all of these measures but have a stronger growth mindset learn more over the course of the following year.
Standardized
test scores and self - reports from teachers and
students were
collected over three years from a sample of 520 children in grades 3 - 5.
To analyze the program's impact on public schools, we
collected school - level
test scores on the 2001 - 02 and 2002 - 03 administrations of the FCAT and the Stanford - 9, a national norm - referenced
test that is given to all Florida public school
students around the same time as the FCAT.
Additionally,
student achievement
tests will be administered and / or existing
test scores will be
collected, and classroom observations will be conducted.
Each
student will be followed for two years by
collecting Higher Achievement application information and school records (
test scores, grades, and attendance) and by surveying parents.
In addition to the survey data
collected, in - depth interviews were conducted with 43 teachers who taught in the promotion-gate grades (3rd, 6th, and 8th, where
students faced their
test -
score Rubicons) at five K - 8 schools in the system.
Using information from a national sample of public and private school
students collected in 2003 as part of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), ETS compared the
test scores of public school
students with those of
students in all private schools, taken together.
The information to be
collected about individual
students may include name, address, grades,
test scores, detailed disciplinary and health records, race, ethnicity, economic status, disabilities & other highly sensitive personal and family details.
Individual
student scores on the California Standards
Test for Mathematics were also
collected.
Billions spent on
collecting standardized
test scores have successfully given us a sense of how
students perform across school districts and states (the answer: not very well), but they do little to tell us meaningfully about how individual
students are doing.
Evers said the new accountability system most likely will focus on data the state already has the ability to
collect, such as proficiency and growth over time on a new state
test being developed, advanced placement enrollment, graduation rates, college entrance exam
scores and industry certification for
students who don't go on to college.
Since 1998, the federal government has attempted to increase the accountability for preparation programs by requiring states to
collect and report information about the programs, including completion rates, average
scores on state and national teaching
tests, and the number of
student teaching hours required.
On this note, and «[i] n sum, recent research on value added tells us that, by using data from
student perceptions, classroom observations, and
test score growth, we can obtain credible evidence [albeit weakly related evidence, referring to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's MET studies] of the relative effectiveness of a set of teachers who teach similar kids [emphasis added] under similar conditions [emphasis added]... [Although] if a district administrator uses data like that
collected in MET, we can anticipate that an attempt to classify teachers for personnel decisions will be characterized by intolerably high error rates [emphasis added].
You know the drill:
student «fill - in - the - bubble» sheets are completed,
collected, sorted, shipped out to the
testing company, scanned,
scored, compiled, and analyzed.
The «layered model,» as it is called by researchers,
collects between three and five years of
test -
score data for each
student in as many subjects as possible, including reading, math, science and social studies, in order to make predictions about how a
student will
score on a given
test.
Standardized
test scores and self - reports from teachers and
students were
collected over three years from a sample of 520 children in grades 3 - 5.