An evidential position is no guarantor of truth41, yet it is not
a collective deception.
It will be expressed where
collective deception is correctly detected, or where the instincts looking for clues to
collective deception incorrectly trigger on things that have similar surface characteristics as
collective deception, hence sometimes this can be correct science.
«== -LCB- It will be expressed where
collective deception is correctly detected,... -LCB- ==
Consider an alternative to your theory about why («skeptics») views on climate change reflect «innate» attributes to «correctly» perceive «
collective deception»:
Ah, but but the determination that the detection of a «correct» form of «
collective deception» is in the eye of the beholders — in contrast to your view that it disproportionatel «correct [ly]» detecting among those who agree with you on a particular topic.
And the meter can also register false positives, where correct science is mistaken for
a collective deception due to a similar look and feel plus science / cultural entanglements (described in detail above), and where values are unaligned.
If you had taken the trouble to read the all the post, you would see that the mechanisms of how innate skepticism detects
collective deception, or incorrectly triggers on characteristics that are not indicative of
collective deception, are completely independent of what the topics at issue are (i.e. work the same for any), and indeed these detection mechanisms are framed using principles that themselves stem from evolution / cultural evolution (so not from contested topic domains such as CC etc. that I or anyone else agrees or disagrees with).
Mass adherents of
collective deceptions are typically passionate and honest, and while more intense and biassed at the deeper end, are still not employing intentional deceit in the vast majority of cases.
Cultural
collective deceptions are emergent rather than intentional.
Let us not forget that David's «values» are aligned with his innate skepticism so that he can «correctly» identify any «
collective deceptions» about the attributes of liberals and conservatives, respectively.
Some of the pre-existing values will themselves derive from
collective deceptions, so across a population ISk would be modulated depending on the rival or ally status of the newer culture25.
This is because these «patterns» are
collective deceptions, which to some extent are held in check by skeptical balance (albeit per the post this is often a «veiled» effect seen in history, as one needs unofficial not official messaging to uncover it).
Also, it is noted in the literature that cultural
collective deceptions could not occur without the development of self - deception.
NOTE: Social analysis can not say what science is true; only what narratives are cultural
collective deceptions, which are never true22a, b, 42 para4.
Yet in a literal sense all competing cultures are just as untrue, they're
all collective deceptions.
Not exact matches
The danger of individual or
collective self -
deception renders this dilemma especially treacherous, and reference to God or religion makes the problem seem even more unsolvable.
These notions include travel, perseverance, the initiative journey, spiritual growth, home and family,
deceptions of reality and comradeship amongst many others, these themes can be witnessed throughout the exhibition and in particular in the group show featuring relevant works by artists selected by the
collective.
In Selfie, the Sparkplug
Collective will explore concepts of identity, transformation, and personal
deception through painting, sculpture, mixed media, photography, and a site - specific performance.
Their entire modus operandi appears predicated on a
collective strategy of
deception employed against taxpayers and the electorate.