Figure 6: Number of electoral
college votes won by Republican presidential election candidate by region, 1972 - 2016
Not exact matches
Each state was decided by a razor - thin margin, which allowed Clinton to
win the popular
vote by roughly 3 million
votes yet still lose in the Electoral
College.
Sabato's Crystal Ball, the forecasting blog run by Larry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia's Centre for Politics, has Clinton
winning 347 electoral
college votes to 191 for Trump.
The president tweeted in late November: «In addition to
winning the Electoral
College in a landslide, I
won the popular
vote if you deduct the millions of people who
voted illegally.
Brandon Watson explains why the National Popular
Vote Interstate Compact --- in which states assign their
votes in the electoral
college to whoever
wins the most
votes countrywide --- is sheer madhattery:
You said, «Very good points, but do you not think there's some flaw there when you can
win through the electoral
college and yet not the overall popular
vote?
Very good points, but do you not think there's some flaw there when you can
win through the electoral
college and yet not the overall popular
vote?
Damian is right, the electoral
college doesn't make much sense anymore after being able to tally
votes a lot easier, plus, what does it mean when a president
wins the electoral
college but not the popular
vote?
Let's look, however, at the electoral
college vote — you know, the
votes all presidential candidates need to
win.
Ohio State
won the national title that year with a sophomore - laden team: quarterback Rex Kern was a future All - American (he twice finished in the top five of the Heisman
voting), defensive tackle Jim Stillwagon would
win the Outland Trophy in 1970, and Jack Tatum and Mike Sensibaugh would become one of the best safety duos in
college football history.
In order to
win the presidency, a candidate must
win 270 Electoral
College votes.
For state D, with its 4
votes in the electoral
college, there are two ways of deciding the coalitions that will not see it
win:
In 2004, the Rs managed a narrow victory around the country, with Bush
winning the popular
vote and electoral
college but with the Rs essentially keeping the same number of seats in the House.
We all know the situation could arise in the U.S. where one candidate
wins the popular
vote but another one the electoral
college.
Liberal activist and filmmaker Michael Moore believes Trump is on track to
win reelection in 2020 despite his low approval poll ratings, and he encouraged Democrats to back a movement to award Electoral
College votes to the national popular
vote winner.
According to its supporters, one of the primary virtues of the electoral
college is that
winning candidates must obtainconcurrent majorities from around the country to
win, rather than appeal to clusters of voters whose
votes could be aggregated across states and regions but nevertheless might not represent all strata of society.
In the end Clinton
won the popular
vote but Trump received 290 Electoral
College votes compared to Clinton's 228 — a clear victory.
He would need to
win all of the big swing states to reach the required 270 Electoral
College votes.
Ed Miliband subsequently
won the election, the result of which was announced on 25 September 2010, after second, third and fourth preferences
votes were counted, achieving the support of 50.654 % of the electoral
college, defeating his brother by 1.3 %.
This means instead of the
winning presidential candidate getting all the
college votes of the state — he gets only the share proportional to his
vote.
Legislation is advancing to the Senate that adds Connecticut to a group of states wanting to pool their Electoral
College votes for the presidential candidate who
wins the popular
vote.
In the extreme case, assuming a constant turnout across all 50 states (and with the electoral
votes distributed as in 2011) *, it could take only 22 % of the popular
vote to
win the electoral
college.
You can
win the electoral
college and thus the presidency without accruing a single popular
vote.
As the 2016 election results continue to come in, it looks pretty clear that Hillary Clinton will
win the popular
vote but lose the electoral
college.
Therefore, a candidate could
win a single electoral
college vote by
winning one district in either state.
But according to a new poll from NBC New York and Marist
College, he'd enter the Democratic field at a strong position, second to Christine Quinn, and would make it harder for any candidate to
win with the 40 percent required to avoid a run - off
vote.
The measure is being supported by Albany area Assemblywoman Patricia Fahy, a Democrat, who says the bill would have New York join an interstate compact in which states would give all of their Electoral
College votes to the presidential candidate who
wins the popular
vote nationwide.
The winner of the popular
vote will automatically
win the Electoral
College as well.
Coming off Mitt Romney's almost - six - million -
vote loss in the presidential election in 2012, which resulted in an electoral -
college margin of 332 - 206 (270 are needed to
win), Republican national chairman Reince Priebus put together a committee of five persons to examine, explain and address the party's losses on the national level.
Despite losing the indirect but all - important state - by - state electoral
college count, «I
won three million more (popular)
votes than the other guy,» she said.
Greenburgh Supervisor Paul Feiner suggested that an «almost presidential museum library» be created to recognize the contributions of Chappaqua's Hillary Clinton and four other presidential candidates who
won the popular
vote but lost the Electoral
College.
For example, he
won majorities of states, counties, and electoral
college votes.
Source: GNA More Headlines in Education KNUST to spend $ 5.6 million to retool its laboratories GIMPA Council meets tomorrow over impasse
Vote of no confidence passed in Amoako - Nuama - led GIMPA Council Poultry industry receives boost with installation of new incubators at KNUST KNUST initiates «chocopreneurship» training to increase uses of cocoa Latest KNUST to spend $ 5.6 million to retool its laborato... GIMPA Council meets tomorrow over impasse
Vote of no confidence passed in Amoako - Nuama - led G... Poultry industry receives boost with installation... KNUST initiates «chocopreneurship» training to inc... Teachers to rain curses on gov» t over unpaid salar... Gov» t to fast track infrastructure dev» t in polyte... Adisadel
College wins 2016 Nat» l Science & Ma... Aftermath of assault; St. John's teachers tr... 10,000 books presented to Central Region schools b...
One example where this was particularly obvious was the 2016 Presidential election, where one candidate
won one large state by such a massive margin, and lost many smaller states by slivers of margins, that one single state by itself caused the electoral
college result to differ from the popular
vote (the state was California - if add up the remaining 49 states and DC, the other candidate comfortably
won the popular
vote as well as the electoral
college).
While rare, Trump's
win in the electoral
college while failing to
win a plurality of the popular
vote was not unique.
He did not gain a majority of the popular
vote but he
won broadly enough that he had a decisive mandate in the electoral
college.
It is possible to
win one to nothing in enough states that the candidates gets at least 270 electoral
college votes, which is enough to
win.
At 2.30 am, the Associated Press projected Trump had
won Wisconsin and called the overall race for Trump, who passed the 270 electoral
college votes he needed to secure the presidency.
He has been repeatedly accused of a cover - up in a bid to keep US intelligence onside, not the kind of thing that
wins you
votes in Labour's electoral
college.
Let's keep in mind that Rump
won a narrow victory in the Electoral
College, lost the popular
vote by close to 3 million and will be a minority president.
You could throw in something about how Hillary actually
won the national popular
vote and how the electoral
college system is seriously broken.
Table 2 (a): Number of electoral
college votes that would have been
won by each candidate if these had been apportioned proportionally (PrEV), as contrasted with the number
won by each candidate in the actual election («winner takes all» /» first past the post»).
«I think from start to finish every campaign strategist looking at this Democratic primary has got to say this is the crucial
vote to get out there to
win,» Iona
College pundit Jeanne Zaino said.
In Washington state, two designated electors say they will not
vote for Clinton in the Electoral
College, even though Clinton is expected to
win the state.
«I think from start to finish, every campaign strategist looking at this Democratic primary has got to say this is the crucial
vote to get out there to
win,» Iona
College political science professor Jeanne Zaino said.
Steve Greenberg, Siena
College Research Institute Pollster, will join us to discuss what happened with the national polling which showed Hillary Clinton
winning the national
vote and many key battleground states she ultimately lost.
As of July 9, 2012, the majority of U.S. voters will have the opportunity to cast a direct
vote for Jill Stein, and she will be on enough ballot lines in enough populous states to
win the Electoral
College and therefore the presidency.
«If hundreds of thousands of Obama supporters stay home and let's say he still
wins the election, if it was going to be really close, it might switch that to where Obama fails to
win the national
vote but still
wins the Electoral
College,» Kelly said.
As you will recall, had Gore
won the popular
vote in Florida, he would have earned enough electoral
college votes to
win the election.
This is a winner - take - all system, whereby the candidate who
wins the popular
vote within a state garners all of the electoral
college votes, even if one candidate
wins a razor - thin popular
vote victory over his or her rival.