When equipped with a 6 - speed manual transmission, the unit returns
a combined cycle fuel consumption of 6.6 l / 100 km and generates CO2 emissions of only 152 g / km.
When equipped with the manual transmission and a CCo, the 1.4 D - 4D 90 unit returns
a combined cycle fuel consumption of 4.7 l / 100 km and generates CO2 emissions of only 124 g / km.
When equipped with a 6 - speed manual transmission, the unit returns
a combined cycle fuel consumption of 6.6 L / 100 km (36 mpg US) and generates CO2 emissions of 152 g / km.
Its claimed
combined cycle fuel consumption of 8.3 litres per 100 km represents a 6.7 per cent improvement over the MY12 VE Omega, and puts the new price leader within 0.2 L / 100 km of the four - cylinder Ford Falcon EcoBoost.
Laguna 2.0 dCi 150hp features running costs that are amongst the lowest of the market and
combined cycle fuel consumption of 5.8 litres / 100 km (equivalent to 154g of CO2 / km).
In addition to its outstanding performance credentials
its combined cycle fuel consumption of just 6.3 litres / 100 km keeps running costs to a minimum.
In the Zafira Tourer, the engine delivers
combined cycle fuel consumption of 4.1 l / 100 km (57.4 mpg US) and 109 g / km CO2.
When equipped with the manual transmission and Stop & Start technology, the improved 1.4 D - 4D 90 unit returns
a combined cycle fuel consumption of 3.8 l / 100 km and generates CO2 emissions of only 99 g / km - a reduction of 0.6 l / 100 km and 10 g / km.
When equipped with the manual transmission the unit returns
a combined cycle fuel consumption of 5.9 l / 100 km and generates CO2 emissions of only 138 g / km - reduction of 0.7 l / 100 km and 12 g / km.
Not exact matches
fuel emissions and
consumption rate is similar to that
of 650S Coup; 24.2 mpg on the EU
combined cycle and 275g / km.
It should hit 62 mph in 9.2 seconds on the way to a 124 mph top speed while returning the equivalent
of 48.0 mpg on the
combined EU
fuel -
consumption cycle.
Maximum output is now 85ps (79ps for the outgoing variant) while improvements in
fuel consumption from 55.4 mpg to 57.7 mpg on the
combined cycle, plus emissions reductions from 119g / km CO2 to 114g / km CO2 make the 1.2 petrol engine one
of the most efficient around.
The diesel - powered Q2 is said to offer a
combined cycle fuel consumption figure
of 5.0 L / 100 km and CO2 emissions
of 131g / km.
Porsche claims it's capable
of a
combined fuel consumption of 2.5 l / 100 km (equivalent to 94 mpg US or 15.9 kWh / 100 km) according to the New European Driving
Cycle (NEDC) for plug - in hybrid models, with corresponding CO2 emissions 56 g / km.
The LWR engine was engine was mated to GM's six - speed 6L45 automatic transmission and, over the
combined ADR 81/02 test
cycle, the Commodore Omega achieved
fuel consumption of 11.8 L / 100 km — an improvement
of 1.6 L / 100 km compared to its dual
fuel LW2 predecessor.
The BMW 320i EfficientDynamics Edition Sedan accelerates in 7.6 seconds from zero to 100 km / h,
combining its athletic spirit with an average
fuel consumption rate as measured on the EU test
cycle of 5.3 litres per 100 kilometres.
Power is transmitted by a six speed manual gearbox engineered to accommodate the increase in torque and
fuel consumption is just 7.1 litres per 100 kilometres on the
combine cycle, well ahead
of its rivals.
The manufacturer claims an ADR
combined -
cycle fuel consumption figure
of 6.3 L / 100 km with CO2 emissions
of 165g / km.
Ford says customers can expect
fuel consumption improvements
of more than 15 percent compared with the outgoing model, which means it will use between 6.0 and 6.8 litres / 100 km on the
combined cycle.
So equipped, Porsche claims
combined -
cycle fuel consumption of 30.5 mpg for the Boxster and 29.4 mpg for the Boxster S — improvements
of about 15 percent over the old model.
Thus equipped,
combined fuel consumption is reduced by 3.0 % (the 2015 numbers
of 8.5 L / 100 km city and 6.4 highway look higher than last year's, but that's because
of the tougher 5 -
cycle test procedure introduced for 2015.)
Its
combined -
cycle fuel consumption is 4 4.5 litres per 100 kilometres, with CO2 emissions
of 118 grams per kilometre.
Combined cycle fuel consumption stands at a reasonable 8.2 litres / 100 km, equivalent to 195g
of CO2 / km.
Our tester was fitted with the six - speed Steptronic auto gearbox, which in theory allows the engine to return a
combined fuel consumption figure
of 5.7 l / 100 km (49 mpg) in the EU
cycle.
Improved efficiency is reflected in
combined -
cycle fuel consumption of 5.9 litres per 100 kilometres and CO2 emissions
of 137 grams per kilometre.
The 1.2 produces 97kW and 205Nm and claims
fuel consumption of 5.6 L / 100 km (auto) in
combined -
cycle testing.
The new efficiency pacesetter in the brand's model range is the BMW 116d EfficientDynamics Edition with 85 kW / 116 hp and average
fuel consumption of 3.4 litres / 100 kilometres (83.1 mpg imp)
combined with CO2 emissions
of 89 g / km in the EU test
cycle.
The Outlander offers a
combined -
cycle fuel consumption figure
of 53.3 mpg, which should mean everyday
fuel consumption in the mid-40s mpg.
Improved efficiency is reflected in
combined -
cycle fuel consumption of 5.8 to 5.9 litres per 100 kilometres and CO2 emissions
of 134 to 137 grams per kilometre (EU test figures, variations due to differences in the tyres fitted).
With reduced
fuel consumption and emission levels, the actual data recorded on type - approval
combined cycle were 122g / km
of CO2 and 25 city / 33 hwy mpg.
Land Rover says the 3 - liter V6 diesel inside the new Range Rover Velar only drinks 6.4 l / 100 km (44.1 mpg) in the
combined cycle, but our real - life
fuel consumption didn't come out
of the 11 - 12 l / 100 km bracket.
Away from the lab - like environment
of the ADR 81/02
combined cycle fuel consumption test, over more than 1000 km
of testing in varied conditions, things predictably got worse, with the Patrol averaging 17.38 L / 100 km, versus the LandCruiser's 12.74 L / 100 km.
The V6 diesel on the other hand promises
fuel consumption figures
of 40.1 mpg (EU) /
combined cycle.
Megane R26.R accelerates from standstill to 100kph in 6.0 seconds and covers the standing start kilometre in a mere 25.9 s. Its homologated
combined cycle fuel consumption is 8.5 L / 100 km, equivalent to 199g
of CO2 / km.
The higher performance 103kW engine is only available with a DSG box as standard, and returns a
combined -
cycle fuel consumption figure
of 5.2 L / 100 km, based on using the recommended 95 RON ULP, as is the case for the 90kW engine.
This one's no exception, also delivering a
combined -
cycle fuel consumption of just 5.5 L / 100 km.
Fuel consumption has dropped from 6.4 to 5.7 L / 100 km in
combined -
cycle testing, and Audi is claiming a 0 - 100 km / h time
of 7.9 seconds — an improvement
of 0.4 seconds.
Renault claims the Alaskan is the most economical model in the segment, with a NEDC
combined -
cycle fuel consumption of 6.3 l / 100 km and CO2 emissions
of 167 g / km.
Clever turbocharger technology, as well as idle - stop system across the range and other up to date engine tweaks reduce
fuel consumption of the front - wheel drive variant to 8.4 L / 100 km on the ADR
combined cycle — 25 per cent better than the outgoing model.
Fuel consumption on the
combined cycle includes a figure
of 10 km / l with CO2 emissions pegged at 234 g / km.
The car accelerates in 7.6 seconds from zero to 100 km / h,
combining its athletic spirit with an average
fuel consumption rate as measured on the EU test
cycle of 5.3 litres per 100 kilometres.
Taking advantage
of loopholes in the European
fuel -
consumption procedure that allows the car to complete the test primarily in electric mode with energy provided through plug - in means, Audi quotes a
combined cycle fuel -
consumption figure
of 156.8 mpg.
With 103 hp, it will power both standard versions
of the new Golf that are claimed to return 61.9 mpg as well as an upcoming BlueMotion
fuel - miser model - with optimized aerodynamics, lower ride height and low - rolling resistance tires - that is claimed to get 73.5 mpg on the
combined European
consumption cycle.
These extraordinary performance figures contrast with lower
combined fuel consumption figures which, at 9.4 — 9.3 l / 100 km, are up to 1.1 l / 100 km less than that
of the previous model (New European Driving
Cycle or NEDC).
Top speed continues to be limited to 155 mph, but with a range
of new
fuel saving features, including an electro - mechanical steering system in place
of the older hydraulically operated setup used before,
combined cycle consumption has improved by 5.4 mpg at an official 24.2 mpg on the European test
cycle.
The update for the current model generation, which also benefits the MINI Hardtop 4 door (
combined fuel consumption: 6.2 — 4.8 l / 100 km;
combined CO2 emissions: 141 — 110 g / km; EU test
cycle figures, dependent on tyre format selected), ranges from specific design modifications and innovative customisation options through to an extension
of the equipment program and the addition
of the latest MINI Connected digital services.
Showcased at the exhibition stand
of the tradition - steeped British brand, it will be a joint premiere for the new MINI Hardtop (
combined fuel consumption: 6.0 — 4.8 l / 100 km;
combined CO2 emissions: 138 — 109 g / km) and the MINI Convertible (
combined fuel consumption: 6.3 — 5.2 l / 100 km;
combined CO2 emissions: 144 — 118 g / km; EU test
cycle figures, dependent on tyre format selected) at a major international motor show.
The new powerplant also boasts excellent
fuel economy: the
combined consumption in the EU
cycle is as high as 34mpg and CO2 emissions are as low as 194g / km, an improvement
of more than 25 per cent over the previous model's figures.
Even with this excellent performance, the
fuel consumption and emissions are extremely low: 5.2 l / 100 km in the
combined cycle and 121 g / km
of CO2, values that make the Giulietta the most environmentally - friendly and efficient petrol - powered compact on the market, even when compared with manual gearbox versions
of competitors with distinctly lower power ratings and performance.
It provides a 0 - 100 kmh time
of just 7.8 seconds, yet its official
fuel consumption is as low as 4.6 litres per 100 km on the open road
cycle and with a
combined fuel figure
of 5.8 litres per 100 km, it is as all but an economy car, something also illustrated by its CO2 figure
of 134 gm per km.