Sentences with phrase «come before the court from»

The first appeal to come before the court from a «sifting» decision made by the SLCC on the eligibility of a complaint.

Not exact matches

Davis» comments come hours after the U.K.'s Supreme Court, the highest court in the land, ruled that the government must seek approval from parliament before invoking Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty — triggering its exit from theCourt, the highest court in the land, ruled that the government must seek approval from parliament before invoking Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty — triggering its exit from thecourt in the land, ruled that the government must seek approval from parliament before invoking Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty — triggering its exit from the E.U.

«The money comes from interests that have matters before the courts, and they'd like to have those matters settled in their favor.»

While any coach in any sport will tell you that the last wins ultimately come from a team's performance of the field or court, the seeds for those wins are often sown years before by winning recruiting battles to bring the talent necessary to compete for those wins.

Acea M. Mosey, who raised more than $ 900,000 to become Erie County's Surrogate's Court judge, will run unopposed after loaning her own campaign half that money and the other half coming from lawyers and law firms that would likely appear before her.

The main obstacle that could divert this plan from being enacted is the Legislature suddenly coming together to pass their own map before the court's process is finished, possibly with a signature on the plan from Governor Andrew Cuomo that effects their alternative redistricting plan into law.

Updated: Common Cause's Susan Lerner takes a different view, noting the recent court ruling that removed the word «independent» from the ballot language before voters when it came to describing the new redistricting commission.

The vast majority of defendants coming before the courts are suffering from addiction, poverty or mental ill - health — very often they suffer from all three.

«That the applicant, who knows full well that she is on bail in the United Kingdom where she is being investigated for several financial crimes, and that she would not be able to leave that country in view of the ongoing investigation and imminent trial, is seeking the order of this honourable court for the charge before this honourable court to be amended to include her name on the face of the charge in order for her to escape from investigation and prosecution in the United Kingdom under the guise that she is coming to face her trial before this honourable court and also to scuttle the trial before this honourable court.»

The case comes before the Supreme Court at a time when presidential candidates from both parties are turning a critical eye to the pervasive influence of money in politics.

Article 14 (1) Every person shall be entitled to his personal liberty and no person shall be deprived of his personal liberty except in the following cases and in accordance with procedure permitted by law; Article 19 (1) A person charged with a criminal offence shall be given a fair hearing within a reasonable time by a court; Article 19 (11) No person shall be convicted of a criminal offence unless the offence is defined and the penalty for it is prescribed in a written law; Article 19 (12) Clause (11) of this article shall not prevent a Superior Court from punishing a person for contempt of itself notwithstanding that the act or omission constitution the contempt is not defined in a written law and the penalty is not so prescribed; and Article 126 (2) The Superior Courts shall be superior courts of record and shall have the power to commit for contempt to themselves and all such powers as were vested in a court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constitucourt; Article 19 (11) No person shall be convicted of a criminal offence unless the offence is defined and the penalty for it is prescribed in a written law; Article 19 (12) Clause (11) of this article shall not prevent a Superior Court from punishing a person for contempt of itself notwithstanding that the act or omission constitution the contempt is not defined in a written law and the penalty is not so prescribed; and Article 126 (2) The Superior Courts shall be superior courts of record and shall have the power to commit for contempt to themselves and all such powers as were vested in a court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constituCourt from punishing a person for contempt of itself notwithstanding that the act or omission constitution the contempt is not defined in a written law and the penalty is not so prescribed; and Article 126 (2) The Superior Courts shall be superior courts of record and shall have the power to commit for contempt to themselves and all such powers as were vested in a court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constitCourts shall be superior courts of record and shall have the power to commit for contempt to themselves and all such powers as were vested in a court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constitcourts of record and shall have the power to commit for contempt to themselves and all such powers as were vested in a court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constitucourt of record immediately before the coming into force of this constitution.

I am saying that the issues that emanated from the Court of Appeal appeared to be missing from the judgment; that is why I want to see the full judgment before coming to any conclusion.

Next came the legal fireworks when prosecution counsel, Prince Ben Ikani shocked the capacity - filled court house as he made frantic efforts to stop the court from hearing the application for bail even before it could be moved and argued by the former minister's lead counsel, Chief Chris Uche (SAN).

Now, as the Schuette case comes before the Supreme Court on October 15, Garces will represent the CRP by presenting findings from research studies that challenge Proposal 2.

(The «courting us» and «dating» business is a bit odd — disengenuous even — especially coming from someone who said NO before the first date!)

Come back from an adrenaline filled day and relax in our spa and sun beds; but if you still have energy, our volleyball court is waiting for you and your friends for a friendly game before cooking up a feast in our BBQ area and newly renovated kitchen!

The injunction — which freezes the mandate to reduce carbon pollution from the US power grid pending an appeals court ruling, presumably followed by an appeal to the high court — came on a 5 - 4 vote, just days before Justice Antonin Scalia's unexpected death roiled the national political climate.

«This is the first time any case for a banana worker has come before a U.S. court,» Duane Miller, one of the attorneys representing more than 30 Nicaraguan plaintiffs who worked on plantations from 1964 to 1990, tells BusinessWeek.According to one upcoming lawsuit that was filed in 2004, Dole Fresh Fruit Co. and Standard Fruit Co., now part of Dole, were not only negligent, but that they fraudulently concealed information about DBCP's effects.

If the whole system of coming to a consensus that leads to meaningful actions is looked at from a chaos theory perspective, I think this so called «bump» may lead to a more chaotic and unpredictable state of affairs for a while longer... i.e., we can't predict what is «likely» to happen in the court of public / policy maker opinion for a more extended period before settling down.

Mauro covers research by Richard Lazarus, who found that an increasing percentage of cases brought to the court come from «repeat practitioners,» i.e., lawyers with multiple appearances before the court.

The fee request comes from lawyers Roxanne Conlin of Des Moines and Richard M. Hagstrom of Minneapolis, who settled the case in April for $ 179.95 million, but not before three trips to the Iowa Supreme Court and some seven years of litigation.

In the test case that came before the Supreme Court in 2010, Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, the Court held that it was constitutional to prohibit a group of humanitarian legal professionals (including a retired U.S. judge) «from engaging in certain specified activities, including training PKK members to use international law to resolve disputes peacefully; teaching PKK members to petition the United Nations and other representative bodies for relief; and engaging in political advocacy on behalf of Kurds living in Turkey and Tamils living in Sri Lanka.»

Furthermore, even if you decide to settle out of court before the case comes to trial, you may even be able to claim the costs of instructing expert witnesses from the other side.

Judges should refrain from conduct such as membership in groups or organizations or participation in public discussion which, in the mind of a reasonable, fair minded and informed person, would undermine confidence in a judge's impartiality with respect to issues that could come before the courts.

The term of the lease was from 1 January 2003 to 28 September 2004 and prior to the grant of the lease, which was made before the amendments to LTA 1954 described above came into force, the parties applied for and obtained an order from the county court excluding the provisions of LTA 1954.

Roberts kept recusing himself from issues that he said could come before the Court, Schumer kept accusing the nominee of refusing to answer questions on day three of his nomination hearings.

The matter came before Mrs Justice Hogg between 29 - 31 July 2014 and it was held that the English Court could not exercise jurisdiction over B as she was not habitually resident here from the date of her removal to Pakistan.

Although the local authority might have the statutory power under s. 33 (3)(b) to prevent M from calling the twins «Preacher» and «Cyanide», there was a small category of cases where, notwithstanding the local authority's powers under s. 33 (3)(b), the consequences of the exercise of a particular act of parental responsibility were so profound and had such an impact on either the child his or herself, and / or the Art. 8 rights of those other parties who shared parental responsibility with a local authority, that the matter must come before the court for its consideration and determination.

If a case comes before the Court that does deal with Convention rights, say for instance a freedom of assembly challenge is brought against Ealing Council's decision to ban protestors outside the Marie Stopes clinic, then, following on from the logical conclusion of this Judgment, the High Court will need to be reviewing the PSPO at a higher level of scrutiny.

Before I became a lawyer, I assumed that a person can simply come to court, tell her story to the judge, and all will go well from there.

Mr. Lamb's practice covers all manner of cases that come before the criminal courts, from mischief to murder.

We use that unique database to share new insights culled from tens of thousands of pages of opinions about the Justices and their decision - making process, the parties and issues which come before the Court.

The plaintiffs challenged eight restrictions on judicial conduct: 1) the prohibition on judicial candidates campaigning as a member of a political organization, 2) the prohibition on judicial candidates making speeches for or against political organizations or candidates, 3) the ban on judicial candidates making contributions to political causes or candidates, 4) the prohibition on judicial candidates from publicly endorsing or opposing candidates for public office, 5) the prohibition on judges from acting as a leader or holding office in a policitical organization, 6) the prohibition on judicial candidates knowingly or recklessly making false statements during campaigns, 7) the ban on judicial candidates making misleading statements, and 8) the prohibition on candidates making pledges, promises, or committments in connection with cases, controversies, or issues that are likely to come before the court.

The new protocol comes as part of the ever increasing encouragement from the Courts for parties to engage in constructive communications with one another, and possibly even pre-action ADR, as well as exchanging information with one another, before...

At the oral argument before this Court, when respondents» counsel was asked whether «this is just a purely Title VII case as it comes to us from the Court of Appeals without any constitutional overtones,» counsel responded:

Sossin notes that restricting judges from speaking about matters that are «likely» to come before the court is an overly restrictive view in an increasingly litigious society.

An action can not be started in the Court of Appeal; the only matter than can come before a court of appeal in an action is an appeal from a another cCourt of Appeal; the only matter than can come before a court of appeal in an action is an appeal from a another ccourt of appeal in an action is an appeal from a another courtcourt.

(1) A judge may hold and manage investments, including real estate, and engage in other remunerative activity, but should refrain from financial and business dealings that exploit the judicial position or involve the judge in frequent transactions or continuing business relationships with lawyers or other persons likely to come before the court on which the judge serves.

We will ensure that the correct version of events comes before the courts and prevent false allegations from damaging your life and your reputation.

The case came before the Court of Appeal from an unreported decision of Justice Grant R. Dow of the Superior Court of Justice, dated September 28, 2016.

Section 7A (3)(e) prohibits a candidate for judicial office from making statements that commit the candidate regarding cases, controversies or issues likely to come before the court.

If the rule of domestic law creates a discretion rather than an absolute rule of law, the domestic court might come to the conclusion that the discretion should be exercised in a different way from that in which it was in fact exercised in the case before the Strasbourg court.

I had someone faced with this situation, (incorrect toll free number supplied by the Adjudicator) apply to Small Claims Court which he did, and the evidence presented was overwhelmingly on his side not the landlords, and the trial judge had to take time out to consult before he made his decision, and came back quite upset to report that there was NO APPEAL possible from a Residential Tenancy Act tribunal decision other than by launching a court action in BC Provincial CourCourt which he did, and the evidence presented was overwhelmingly on his side not the landlords, and the trial judge had to take time out to consult before he made his decision, and came back quite upset to report that there was NO APPEAL possible from a Residential Tenancy Act tribunal decision other than by launching a court action in BC Provincial Courcourt action in BC Provincial CourtCourt....

The second germane fact was revealed by the AIT: «In the revised reasons for deportation letter it is noted that it is unlikely that the appellant will re-offend... [The points made are that] the court has deemed that the appellant's crime is of such severity that he will always continue to be a threat to the community, the appellant's notoriety might make him feel excluded from society as he had been before and there was a significant risk that his previous disregard for authority and the law might resurface and result in him coming to adverse attention.

Many lawyers and judges appear to take the position that electronic technology in the litigation process is best suited for the large document cases which usually come before the court in large urban areas and are handled by lawyers from large legal firms with IT departments.

«Can the Supreme Court entertain appeals from cases that had already been heard and determined by the Court of Appeal before this Court came into existence?

This case differs from many of the relocation cases that come before the court in two important ways.

The cases, both of which are currently before the Ontario Superior Court, attack long - standing policies whose time may have come: Canadian Blood Services» ban on blood donations from men who have had sex with men, and the three sections of the Criminal Code outlawing activities relating to prostitution.

Before coming to the class or signing up for the online course, ensure you have received permission from the court to take a defensive driving course.